Kari Lake WINS Right to Bring Election Fraud Case to Trial! - Judge DENIES Motion To Dismiss

Shouldn't Kari stay in town and attend the court hearing on Wednesday?

She's going to be at a AmFest: twitter.com...

Maybe the hearing is for next week?

a reply to: carewemust

Amfest is in Phoenix.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: carewemust

Amfest is in Phoenix.

That's good. Hopefully it's tomorrow night AFTER the hearing. Judges look for reasons to rule against the person bringing election challenges. I recall how the PA judge chewed up Rudy Giuliani because Rudy didn't seem well-prepared.

a reply to: carewemust

That's nice.
Nothing will come of it and it's just a show to convince you the institutions of government are broken beyond repair.
So you'll eventually make it possible that your democratic rights and liberties are taken from you.

I hope you're happy, ecstatic, a delirious stupor of happiness seems only appropriate.

a reply to: Peeple

I'm always happy when the Liberal Media and Democrats are upset!

This will bore you, but maybe not others...

After Judge Peter Thompson's Ruling Tonight, we are given 6 undisputed facts about the 2022 Arizona election: Election Day issues, ballot counts, legal threats, etc..

HERE: justthenews.com...

a reply to: dashen

Wrong Dashen. The Gateway Pundit is NOT your friend.

WGAU: Kari Lake will get to make case for election misconduct

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson dismissed eight of the 10 claims Lake raised in her lawsuit, which asks the judge to either declare her the winner or hold a revote in the county. Thompson took no position on the merits of Lake's two surviving claims, but he wrote that the law allows her to make her case.

Lake lost to Democrat Katie Hobbs by just over 17,000 votes out of 2.6 million cast. She will attempt to prove in a two-day hearing scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday that:

1) ballot printers malfunctioned in Maricopa County because of intentional interference by election officials and
2) that ballots were improperly added at a county contractor that handles returned mail ballots.

(Note: I turned that paragraph into a list for clarity)

The complaints you relate from the Gateway Pundit are the one's that were dismissed.

The two remaining are patently, obviously, and trivially false. But OK, fine. She gets to make her case, and she gets to lose.

You should recognize by now that Lake is, like her hero the ex-POTUS, merely a performance artist with sound and fury but no substance.

a reply to: rnaa

Re: apnews.com...

Democrats need to learn how to lie more effectively. In this article the Maricopa county officials (Democrats) say "Everybody got to vote on election day".

No more needs to be said about a claim like that! Boy are they stupid.

a reply to: dashen


Ahh someone that wont credit themselves?
Obviously your argument will be ohh he is a Trump deny>.
Your liink are proven dog poop.
But hey she lost and at the end there is absolutely nothing you Q folks can complain about.
Fair elections bro.

a reply to: dashen

Love that guy, vermin supreme for president!

a reply to: Peeple

So you'll eventually make it possible that your democratic rights and liberties are taken from you.

The fear is oozing in this statement. I'm betting you do know just how bad it is in Maricopa County... and just how bad this trial will be for the cheaters. Just having these problems aired in court, on record, with evidence-- including witnesses and whistleblowers -- is devastating. No matter how the judge rules.

And just FYI, there are no such things as "democratic rights" because in a democracy any/all "rights" can be taken by the majority. Which is why we have a Constitutional Republic empoweredto protect and defend our absolute inalienable natural rights. By intention and design.

a reply to: Boadicea

No. What made it to court are two irregularities which had zero impact on the outcome.

And the lower half: meanwhile in reality it's Trump calling for the suspension of the constitution....

But I admit I am afraid because

No matter how the judge rules.

that's already patently obvious for the Q and MAGA crowd.

a reply to: Peeple

First, my apologies for running words together. I'm on my phone and predictive text doesn't space itself. I gotta pay better attention.

To your point --

What made it to court are two irregularities which had zero impact on the outcome...

Your "irregularities" are literally our laws broken... and therefore a broken election system.

And neither you, me, nor the lamppost have any idea to what extent the legal and procedural violations affected the count.

I'm hoping we find out exactly how much. Even if it's proven to be zero impact.

As for Trump, he needs to STFU. He had his chance. Time for him to go away. But his words don't scare me. Deeds by those in power are far scarier.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: rnaa


Democrats need to learn how to lie more effectively. In this article the Maricopa county officials (Democrats) say "Everybody got to vote on election day".

It is NOT Democrats in Arizona who were running the election in Maricopa County - it was Republicans.

It is a simple fact that EVERYONE WHO WANTED TO VOTE ON ELECTION DAY HAD THE CHANCE TO VOTE.

Where the precinct printers were mucked up, every voter could deposit their ballot in the ballot box EXACTLY as voters have done for decades before the local tabulators were adopted. That box was then transported to the central counting headquarters and processed EXACTLY as ballots have been processed for decades.

And that procedure is EXACTLY what the you anti-democracy election deniers are trying to return the system to after eliminating the local tabulators - you put your ballot in a box which is then transported to the election headquarters and counted there. That process will take longer to complete than the current process - much longer.

But of course you want a 100% hand count to be completed in what 3 hours? 4 hours tops? Or should they just stop counting when the clock strikes midnight and that's it? Maybe they should just take exit polls and forget the actual ballot process altogether?

Anti-democracy anarchists should learn how to disguise their hypocrisy more effectively.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Peeple

HERE: justthenews.com...

Point #2 will no doubt come into play in the trial --

2. As of two days after the election, there was a nearly 16,000-ballot discrepancy between the outstanding ballot counts estimated by Maricopa County and the Arizona secretary of state's office. "Unable to currently reconcile SOS listing with our estimates from yesterday," Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer wrote in a Nov. 10 email. The county estimated 392,000 ballots left to be counted, while the secretary of state's website said there were 407,664 ballots left. "So there's a 15,000 difference somewhere," Richer concluded.

It makes no sense that the Secretary of State’s Office had more ballots from Maricopa County than Maricopa County recorded. How could that even happen in a fair and honest election?

And, of course, the Secretary of State is also the "winning" candidate for governor... who threatened arrest for anyone refusing to certify her "win". Nothing free and fair about that!

I also expect the unexplained 25,000 increase in votes left to be counted will have to be explained.

Funny how Katie had just enough more votes to not only "win," but to evade the .5% automatic recount.

a reply to: dashen

Yeah, BIG NEWS in the sorry little world of MAGA. Barely stirs the waters out in the real world.

Eight out of ten claims thrown out of court. The remaining two are trivial but are being heard for procedural reasons, though the judge specifically refuses to comment on their merits.

The people who attacked rnaa should go and read the judgement. It's linked in that lying Gateway Pundit article, though they make it as hard as possible to find the link and read the text. Every word he wrote is true.

Ho, hum. Next!

a reply to: rnaa

Quite the rant.

So Kari and Katie will have their day in court. Evidence will be presented. Facts will be told. Witnesses will testify. As will whistleblowers. The sun will shine brightly for the whole world to see.

I'm good with that!!!

originally posted by: musicismagic
So is it going to a fair and just trial ?

safe and effective.

a reply to: Astyanax

The remaining two are trivial but are being heard for procedural reasons, though the judge specifically refuses to comment on their merits.

You consider chain-of-custody violations trivial?

And sabotaging election machines is trivial as well?

Wow. So glad you aren't the judge!

Lots of people know these are very significant matters. And very serious problems when laws are broken and safeguarding procedures are violated.

Including the judge.

originally posted by: SuperSaturn

This is a powder keg. if they can prove fraud in this election, similar cases can be brought across the nation. Perhaps even overturning 2020.

How would possible voter fraud in a county for a governer overturn the 2020 presidential elections?

Not to mention, she is an avid Trump supporter who believes the 2020 elections were fraudelent. Is every republican going to claim cheating if they lost now?

I guess you were getting treatment for hearing loss and mental issues when HILLARY was bitching about the FRAUDULENT election of DJT to the presidency instead of her

originally posted by: rnaa

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: rnaa


Democrats need to learn how to lie more effectively. In this article the Maricopa county officials (Democrats) say "Everybody got to vote on election day".

It is NOT Democrats in Arizona who were running the election in Maricopa County - it was Republicans.

It is a simple fact that EVERYONE WHO WANTED TO VOTE ON ELECTION DAY HAD THE CHANCE TO VOTE.

Where the precinct printers were mucked up, every voter could deposit their ballot in the ballot box EXACTLY as voters have done for decades before the local tabulators were adopted. That box was then transported to the central counting headquarters and processed EXACTLY as ballots have been processed for decades.

And that procedure is EXACTLY what the you anti-democracy election deniers are trying to return the system to after eliminating the local tabulators - you put your ballot in a box which is then transported to the election headquarters and counted there. That process will take longer to complete than the current process - much longer.

But of course you want a 100% hand count to be completed in what 3 hours? 4 hours tops? Or should they just stop counting when the clock strikes midnight and that's it? Maybe they should just take exit polls and forget the actual ballot process altogether?

Anti-democracy anarchists should learn how to disguise their hypocrisy more effectively.

KATIE HobbGoblin Hobbs was the Secretary of state -