It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When someone is part of a defined pension plan, they pay into it for x-years. They have little (if any) control over how that is invested. They would get penalized for something essentially 100% out of their control.
Someone taking a loan has complete control over how much to take out, compare different rates at times, and ultimately decide whether or not to go ahead with it. No surprises there.
Now, if you’re making a general complaint about government exceeding their authority to take from one group and give to another (often arbitrarily),
I’d probably agree with you more often than not. However, that is not how you framed the OP.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: network dude
regardless of how you feel about the difference between the two, the issue is and remains to be, that Biden can't just sign an EO and spend billions of dollars. It has to go through congress. That's why his rich kid loan forgiveness plan didn't work. Well, it did work for Biden, he just wanted to get those midterm votes, but it didn't work for the kids thinking they could spend that loan payment on beer.
I have a sneaking suspicion that some of those kids acted in haste and probably did things thinking the forgiveness was a done deal. It sucks. My husband and I have taught our kids, it's not done, until the ink is dry.
originally posted by: SRPrime
originally posted by: JAGStorm
www.illinoispolicy.org...
BIDEN PROMISES NEARLY $36 BILLION FOR NATIONAL PENSION BAILOUTS
The Biden administration promised nearly $36 billion to stabilize pension plans for Teamsters nationwide after forecasts predicted the system’s default by 2026. Union members would have seen their retirement benefits slashed by 60% if the system defaulted.
The proposed “hold harmless” pension reform developed by the Illinois Policy Institute would tie all pension cost-of-living adjustments to inflation rather than a fixed rate of annual growth, saving more than $50 billion by 2045. It would also increase required government contributions to fund 100% of promised pensions rather than the current 90% target.
All the same things said about the College loan forgiveness can be said for this.
-I don’t benefit from this
-I didn’t choose to work here
-My state isn’t responsible
-It is their problem if their fund was responsible
-I didn’t vote for this
-Pensioners should have known this was a possibility and planned better and not put all their eggs in one basket
-Pensioners should have been more savvy with their finances and have seen this has happened to other retirement plans.
-If there is a problem with the plan/financials the pensioners should take it up with the program and not expect Americans to BAIL them out.
-This isn’t a problem that happened overnight, it was predicted and could have been prevented
See how that works? But it doesn’t work that way. When it comes to some people they get “rescued” when it comes to others, you’re just out of luck.
I’m old enough to see the game. I’m old enough to know the whole college loan forgiveness was a probably a giant sham to get young people into even more debt to be debt slaves for the rest of their lives. Nothing is FREE, remember that. The only way you can escape this is to not play the game!
If it were me, NOBODY would be getting bailed out, not the Banks, not the College Students, not the Pensioners.
We are rewarding irresponsibility over and over in this country and wonder why we have such problems and division. This is not a liberal thing either, I’ve seen it happen on both side pretty regularly.
IF we ARE going to bail people out, we need to spread that equally, give the young people a bone too. Just my 2 cents.
Huge difference between a pension that was worked for and a loan we took out on purpose.
If you can't see that I dunno what to tell you -- these are not the same thing at all.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: Edumakated
Pension plans shouldn't get squat. Half the states are broke due to overly generous pension obligations. The plans have been mismanaged.
Just a little sidebar,
How the heck can you stand staying in that state?
It pains me to even visit lately. The "fees" costs and all the added taxes remind me very quickly of why
we left.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: Edumakated
Pension plans shouldn't get squat. Half the states are broke due to overly generous pension obligations. The plans have been mismanaged.
They were talking about this 15 years ago! You are telling me in 15 years they couldn’t come up with anything?
Crazy!
originally posted by: zachsquatch1
I agree.
The government shouldn't mitigate risks with your collective gamble. They taxpayers shouldn't be on the hook for poor choices or bad luck.
I'll take it a step further and say that Social Security should be made optional. That's easier on the ears than to say "abolish it", even though the system would collapse in a year of it being made optional.
a reply to: DontTreadOnMe
Just like Detroit was left to wither on the vine during the Obama years.
Contentious bankruptcy, mainly to to Detroit being corrupt, mismanaged and not paying their bills.
Detroit came through it though....