It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Can you compress Phase3 trails in 5-6 months?!
No idea. Phase 3 trials by Pfizer were done over 13 months.
Ok it doesn't change things that much. Again impossible to get the vital information you want in that short period of time. It actually takes years to get to know them. In 13 months, if we trust them (not many do), you can only start seeing the short term effects.
How about 60 years? That's when studies into mRNA vaccines started.
No vaccines approved by the FDA prior to this.
Do you know of any mRNA vaccine for other infectious diseases?
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: TerryDon79
When was the first mRNA vaccine injected into a human?
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Can you compress Phase3 trails in 5-6 months?!
No idea. Phase 3 trials by Pfizer were done over 13 months.
Ok it doesn't change things that much. Again impossible to get the vital information you want in that short period of time. It actually takes years to get to know them. In 13 months, if we trust them (not many do), you can only start seeing the short term effects.
How about 60 years? That's when studies into mRNA vaccines started.
No vaccines approved by the FDA prior to this.
Do you know of any mRNA vaccine for other infectious diseases?
Just the one against covid-19. Doesn't change the fact that the tech has been looked at since the 60s and there are now more ongoing trials with mRNA vaccines for other things.
But there’s another problem. Martin points out that “COVID-19 disease” has been defined as a series of clinical symptoms. Moreover, there’s no causal link between SARS-CoV-2, the virus, and the set of symptoms known as COVID-19.
How is that, you might ask? It’s simple, really. Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they’ve not been able to establish a causal link between the virus and the clinical disease.
Under the Cover of ‘Emergency’
As noted by Martin, if state governors were to lift the state of emergency, all of a sudden the use of RT PCR testing would be in violation of 15 U.S. Code FTC Act, as PCR tests are not an approved diagnostic test.
“You cannot diagnose a thing [with something] that cannot diagnose a thing,” Martin says. “That a misrepresentation. That is a deceptive practice under the Federal Trade Commission Act. And they’re liable for deceptive practices.”
originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Illumimasontruth
let's keep doing what we've been doing and hope for different results, sounds legit to me...