It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In an expert declaration to a federal district court in North Carolina concerning H.B. 2, Dr. Deanna Adkins stated, “From a medical perspective, the appropriate determinant of sex is gender identity.” Adkins is a professor at Duke University School of Medicine and the director of the Duke Center for Child and Adolescent Gender Care (which opened in 2015).
Adkins argues that gender identity is not only the preferred basis for determining sex, but “the only medically supported determinant of sex.” Every other method is bad science, she claims: “It is counter to medical science to use chromosomes, hormones, internal reproductive organs, external genitalia, or secondary sex characteristics to override gender identity for purposes of classifying someone as male or female
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Asmodeus3
If there's no such thing as gender or biological sex, then why do Trans folk spend their lives attempting to change said biological markers to mimic those of something they claim doesn't exist?
Answers on a postcard.
originally posted by: musicismagic
CRAZY SAYS AS CRAZY SAYS.,,
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Asmodeus3
The whole thing is madness.
The entire premise for this ideology within the sociological field is based on the existence of hermaphrodites.
However rare this biological error, caused by a gene mutation, they have somehow come up with the idea that gender is on a scale.
They also completely ignore hundreds of thousands of years of evolution and instinct that lead to traditional gender roles and claim that they are solely a product of societal influence.
It's manipulation of young impressionable minds and predation of mental illness to further destruct western civilization.
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: Asmodeus3
What if we are being forced to look in the wrong direction?
What if what is occurring is a natural adaptation for human survival, because of something they did that screwed up our environment?
They say that frogs are our canaries in the coal mine. Frogs have been noted over a few years now, to have had alterations in their natural sex formations.
Nature adapts to evolve to sustain life on this planet. What if what we are seeing is maybe an adaptation for the continuation of human like life on this planet, becuase they screwed up big time and they are trying to damage control, by changing our feelings about sexual identity?
Just a thought.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I understand that. But, those intersex deformities are their basis for claiming gender is a scale. At least in the sociology academic field.
I just spent an entire semester pointing this out to a professor who had no counter argument when I pointed this nonsense out when she tried pushing it in our class.
At least in the sociology academic field.
originally posted by: didntasktobeborned
At least in the sociology academic field.
I had no idea sociology was an academic field..Thats why I love ATS..the learning never stops..
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: didntasktobeborned
At least in the sociology academic field.
I had no idea sociology was an academic field..Thats why I love ATS..the learning never stops..
Well it is part of academia but sociology is in the field of social sciences. What they can't do is to disregard the natural and biomedical sciences in favour of ideologies and political correctness. It makes them even more foolish as this anomalous situation persists.
What do you think?