Dr. David Martin talks about the potential dark days ahead...

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Because the written word has to have a way to show the emphasis that would be understood from the human voice.

So just because then, it would have been easier simply to state for "enthesis" instead of all your human voice nonsense.

We just call it screaming here all the same.

And its because you want to be heard.

Italics also serve the same purpose.

Really, is that what they are for?

I use all caps when the stakes are high.

A bioweapon is high stakes.

Stakes are always high at inflammatory fake new websites you are championing, facts through well they seem to be rather short of those.

Regarding why EVERYONE WHO GOT THE JAB IS NOT DROPPING DEAD: The vials are not all the same. Some are even placebos.

Of course, they are, that would not be a complicated procedure to implement at all. LoL

Never mind the fact that every nation on Earth including the ones that hate each other guts and are at war would need to be complicit in the act.

How does that one work again? Aside from in the heads of lunatics of course.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Well, we know where your tongue seems to be located, we type with our fingers all the same.

DTOM canny help you on this one Itisnowagain as a MOD any road, because she is part of the thread, and also knows fine well the reputation "Beforeitsnews.com" has around these here parts.

She's tried to help the fellow by providing a better source as to the story attempting to be punted, but its clear in her initial post what she thinks about the site in question, same as most other sane people here at ATS.

Not going to pretend I have watched that vid.
Or that I think that site is worth much of anything at all....

If posters choose to use well-known fake news websites as their initial and only source of a story people are apt to question the veracity of the information presented never mind their motivations.

a reply to: andy06shake
I just saw your late edit:

Also were you not making claims not that long ago in another thread that 75% of the UK population would be dead or thereabouts down to your vaccine shenanigans or whatnot?

Was I?
Or have you misconstrued again? Twisting stuff and using it to attack......bad form.

Whenever a member posts a source I'm not familiar with, I routinely search the source before watching a video.

Here is a screenshot of the Before It's News link:

beforeitsnews.com...

This person "kingarko" has a Bitchute channel. Here is a screenshot of the "About" page for the channel:

www.bitchute.com...

This user has a passion for the truth.

That is a requirement for this age of deception from the controllers of our planet.

I now have subscribed to his (I'm assuming) channel.

We the people have a ton of work to do to make this a better world. I think the knowledge to be gained from ardent truthseeking whistleblowers is invaluable.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

So it was not you that alluded to the fact that blah blah blah 75% of the UK might be dead or dying rather soon down to something you read on Google?

Simple question did you say something to that effect or not?

Yes or no answer will suffice.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Whenever a member posts a source I'm not familiar with, I routinely search the source before watching a video.

Your are a "DevotedResearcher" that was not familiar with the fact "Beforeitsnews.com" punts fake spurious information and Qanonacrap?

As to your Bitchute mumbo-jumbo, well that's another place "known for hosting far-right individuals, conspiracy theorists, and hate speech."

Do you have any sources that are not right-wing racist religious havens for the Qanoakids?

Certainly don't have a passion for any sort of real moderation now does its your beloved Bitchute?

a reply to: andy06shake

Simple question did you say something to that effect or not?

Yes or no answer will suffice.

You go and find whatever it is you are accusing me of.....and present it as evidence.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Are you going to simply ask questions without answering any?

Sure ive explained how reciprocation works to you before.

I will have your answer to the simple question please, did you say something to that effect or not?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

I read the news article you presented . . .

And what did you think?

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

That mRNA vaccines are not much to do with global population control and would make a piss poor never mind rather expensive bio-weapon springs to mind.

The fact is there are far easier ways to control or retard our population numbers than with vaccines DevotedResearcher.

All they would need to do is put it in our water supply if that was the game.

No need to get everyone to line up to receive multiple inoculations unless you are trying to get caught out.

a reply to: andy06shake

So just because then, it would have been easier simply to state for "enthesis" instead of all your human voice nonsense.

It's 'emphasis' ......

a reply to: Itisnowagain



I didn't have the energy.

LOL.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: DevotedResearcher

That mRNA vaccines are not much to do with global population control and would make a piss poor never mind rather expensive bio-weapon springs to mind.

The fact is there are far easier ways to control or retard our population numbers than with vaccines DevotedResearcher.

All they would need to do is put it in our water supply if that was the game.

Okay; now we have the basis of a rational discussion.

No need to get everyone to line up to receive multiple inoculations unless you are trying to get caught out.

What do you mean?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Sorry i must have been typing with my tongue.

My mistake "enthesis" is the bit where a tendon is attached apparently. LoL

Still not answering questions i see, why is that now?

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Okay; now we have the basis of a rational discussion.

Always had that DevotedResearcher, you won't find much rational discussions or information at the likes of Beforeitsnews.com all the same.

What do you mean?

I mean what i say buddy, if population control was the desired effect, all they would need to do it introduce substances into our water supply and food chain.

No need to get the masses to line up to receive expensive vaccines in a time-consuming manner where they are apt to get caught at some point.

It would simply be counter-productive toward the desired effect and dangerous to those that choose to administer the vaccines.

But your main hurdle and point of contention to such a thing would be the level of complicity involved and required at all sorts of different levels.

Which would be impossible to hide or even implement worldwide down to the fact every nation on earth would need to be behind the lie, and that simply would not fly any way you wish to punt it.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

And yet you can find the time to champion the likes of "Beforeitsnews.com" or "Bitchute.com."

Some may suggest that ordeal is rather a draining experience energy wise.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

Humanity worldwide is under threat by a bioweapon.
For those who don't believe that, watch this: THE SEQUEL TO THE FALL OF THE CABAL - PART 26: WRAPPING UP GENOCIDE

I'm watching this video right now. I put it on pause because the subject of man-made nanotechnology showing up in the jab just came up. At 18:37, a screenshot:

www.bitchute.com...

The documentary goes on to explain that graphene is all over the place in our environment.

That assertion illustrates that we have to look at the whole big picture of what we're dealing with. It is a complex subject requiring cooperation among truthseekers worldwide.

a reply to: andy06shake

YOU need to wise up!

Free speech is essential to finding scientific truth about the jab.

YOU need to become part of the solution instead of the problem.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

I'm watching this video right now. I put it on pause because the subject of man-made nanotechnology showing up in the jab just came up. At 18:37, a screenshot:

Its only 30 mins or so long so im sure you will be able to summaries the info easy enough for us all.

The documentary goes on to explain that graphene is all over the place in our environment.

No graphene in the mRNA vaccines so there is that nor do they make us magnetic or Bluetooth enabled.

www.verificat.cat...

That assertion illustrates that we have to look at the whole big picture of what we're dealing with. It is a complex subject requiring cooperation among truthseekers worldwide.

Always best to look at the big picture.

As to graphene well its hardly the worst thing we have managed to introduce into the environment even if it does raise some concerns, that's a given.

What does the big picture tell you about how complicit all the nations on Earth would need to be to get away with what you are suggesting all the same?

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

YOU need to wise up!

And you need to wake up.

Free speech is essential to finding scientific truth about the jab.

I would have thought science and technology would be more helpful in that department.

As to "Free Speech" nothing is free in this world buddy, im sure i have been through this with you before.

Far as i can establish, all the same, nobody is stopping you from saying your piece.

YOU need to become part of the solution instead of the problem.

Ile just do as i please mate to within rhyme and reason, hows that.

Might be best not to attempt to tell others what to do through.

As to solutions well you won't find those at the likes of "Beforeitsnews.com" or "Bitchute" that's a given.

Have fun trying all the same, each to their own and all that jazz.