Dr. David Martin talks about the potential dark days ahead...

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

But it does matter who says it especially if they are talking crap.

And as always how come 40% of us here in the UK are not dead or dying with your VAIDS nonsense claims?

A simple search shows the doom porn you attempt to punt to be nothing more than mince and yet you cannot stop yourself from doing so.

How's is that for a point, and how many times have you been wrong now?

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

Well the Op did choose to use "beforeitsnews.com" as a source, have to wonder why that was don't you think?

It's predicted that by around 2080, the world's population is expected to peak at 10.5 billion people by which time we are apt to both be long gone i should think.

Far as i understand the predicament the decline in birthrate is a first-world problem down to our societies, religious beliefs, and economic prosperity.

And not much to do with injections or vaccines at all, mRNA based or otherwise.

a reply to: andy06shake

I've been a researcher for a long time, and there are MANY things I've learned from whistleblowers, who sometimes cannot be heard from in certain places. I've been very tenacious in seeking truth.

Seek and ye shall find, so to speak.

I will not argue with people whose frame of reference is TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM MINE. It would be an exercise in futiility.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

So how do the jump rooms function praytell?

And how do they breathe and not be irradiated to death whilst fighting off the native Martians on the surface?

Im sure your whistleblowers must have answered those simple queries.

By the way, we are not arguing buddy its simply a discussion with a little banter and debate, well at least on my part anyhoo.

Always find Dr. Martin to be very easy to assimilate. I generally don't go on agreement rants as I'm more interested in what he says next than last...

The worst is yet to come, just as many people thought a return to normalcy was a possibility. The controlled demolition of the western high consumption lifestyle is in full swing.

It's almost is if food production around the globe is being adjusted to accommodate a massive loss of life in the next few years. People need to become self dependent asap...

As others have expressed, I'm hopeful that the predictions are way off the mark. The same way they use predictive modelling to enforce draconian measures across the globe, however unsuccesful the predictions are, the opposition can use similar faulty models, can't they? Just look at the track record of Neil Ferguson, the "innovator of models used to justify crisis management and pandemic forecasting since at least December 2000".

After all, Neil was not only personally responsible for the lockdowns that were imposed onto the people of the UK, Canada, much of Europe and the USA, but as the world’s most celebrated mathematical modeller, he had been the innovator of models used to justify crisis management and pandemic forecasting since at least December 2000. 

It was at this time that Neil joined Imperial College after spending years at Oxford. He soon found himself advising the UK government on the new “foot and mouth” outbreak of 2001.

Neil went to work producing statistical models extrapolating linear trend lines into the future and came to the conclusion that over 150,000 people would be dead by the disease unless 11 million sheep and cattle were killed. Farms were promptly decimated by government decree and Neil was awarded an Order of the British Empire for his service to the cause by creating scarcity through a manufactured health crisis.

In 2002, Neil used his mathematical models to predict that 50,000 people would die of Mad Cow Disease which ended up seeing a total of only 177 deaths.

In 2005, Neil again aimed for the sky and predicted 150 million people would die of Bird Flu. His computer models missed the mark by 149,999,718 deaths when only 282 people died of the disease between 2003-2008. In 2009, Neil’s models were used again by the UK government to predict 65,000 deaths due to Swine flu, which ended up killing about 457 people.

Despite his track record of embarrassing failures, Neil continued to find his star rising ever further into the stratosphere of science stardom. He soon became the Vice Dean of Imperial College’s Faculty of Medicine and a global expert of infectious diseases.  In 2019, he was assigned to head the World Health Organization’s Collaboration Center for Infectious Disease Modelling, a position he continues to hold to this day. It was at this time that his outdated models were used to “predict” 500,000 COVID deaths in the UK and two million deaths in the USA unless total lockdowns were imposed in short order.

Source: Unlimited Hangout - The Club of Rome and the Rise of the “Predictive Modelling” Mafia

Haven't read the whole article yet, but it's quality work.

a reply to: andy06shake

I cannot know that, but could speculate it was not easy to find a platform for the 2 hour video.
Since some platforms heavy censor certain topics.

We should be discussing the content of the video, not the platform.
JMHO.

ETA
There has to be reasons for the decline in birthrates, it is a serious issue.
We should looks at every possibility: diet, medical conditions, medications [including vaccinations/mRNA], toxins in the environment.

Look at all the problems that arose after years of taking the birth control pills.
Things that were missed when the first pills were prescribed...things that possibly could NOT have been foreseen.

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

Really i would have thought short of them barring the doors, Bitchute would have happily hosted such a video?

I read the news article you presented but im not willing to waste 2 hours on more repetitive anti-vax nonsense hosted by Beforeitsnews.com for very obvious reasoning.

A short summary outlining how this guff is in any way different from any of the other stuff doing the rounds might be nice from the Op.

Edit: Our diet and sedimentary lifestyle will indeed play its part where a decline in birth rates are concerned but that's just the way our society goes, or it seems to be from where i am standing.

a reply to: andy06shake

Which is why I posted an on topic article.
The web source is not the topic here.

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

The choice of Ops "web source" certainly doesn't add any sort of credibility.

As to the topic well that seems to be a decline in birth rates down to mRNA vaccines far as i can establish.

And the fact of the matter is that birthrates in both our respective nations have been in decline long before the mRNA vaccines were available.

Hence my ambivalence to swallow the notion that mRNA vaccines are now responsible for such.

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: andy06shake

ETA
There has to be reasons for the decline in birthrates, it is a serious issue.
We should looks at every possibility: diet, medical conditions, medications [including vaccinations/mRNA], toxins in the environment.

Agreed.

Toxins in the environment is definitely a massive issue. Like bisphenol A and B, used to make plastic hard or soft. It shouldn't be hard to find a source on this I believe, but it has been proven to have a huge impact on fertility/quality on sperm. Corbett report had a very good article on this if I remember correctly. I'll try to find it.

Anyway, there are probably a great number of reasons birth rates in the west are going down. BPA being one of them. It really is deeply concerning.

a reply to: Droogie

I think you're calling it with the toxins in the environment and in our food chain aka the decline in our birthrates in the first-world nations.

No need to introduce expensive vaccines into the equation.

It would be far more easy and cost-effective to simply introduce agents to our water supply that reduced fertility if that was their game, but as you suggest they are already there, job done.

a reply to: andy06shake

How can anyone know those vaccines. are. all. that. safe?
How can you know they are NOT affecting birth rates? Look at the excess miscarriages lately. There needs to be an HONEST and open investigation into problems caused by new medical treatments.

Look how long it took for Birth Control pill issues to become mainstream?
Look ho long it took to realized the dangers of BPAs?

a reply to: andy06shake

The problem you have with the assertion that plastics are causing a huge decrease in birthrates is that these plastics have been a part of our daily lives for decades. So all of the sudden, the plastics are causing a 30, 40, or 60% drop in birth rates, and an exponential increase in still born babies? C'mon man. That is much more far fetched than the possibility that the vaxx is causing it.

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

Not much in this world that is 100% safe DontTreadOnMe.

As to how we can know mRNA vaccines are not affecting birth rates?

Well there is the fact that they have been in decline for quite some time previous to mRNA vaccines existing as i have already stated.

Far as I'm aware there are indeed investigations into problems caused by new medical treatments.

Where mRNA vaccines are concerned myocarditis in a very small percentage of those who receive such seems to have been proven to be the case but the benefits far outweigh the risk involved.

The most common side effects where birth control pills are concerned would seem to be spotting or bleeding between periods, but im not a woman so i canny really speculate in that department.

a reply to: MaxxAction

I did not suggest its was only plastics that are causing a huge decrease in birthrates MaxxAction.

But a multitude of contributing factors and agents that enter into our food chain and bodies to be the real culprit.

The decline in birth rates existed long before mRNA vaccines thats a fact hence important to consider where blame is concerned.

Should also add my wee pal Jade just had a child a few days back, 2 weeks early, but fine and dandy and healthy as can be, both mother and daughter, and shes vaccinated x 4, guess she must just be one of the lucky ones.

originally posted by: MaxxAction
a reply to: andy06shake

The problem you have with the assertion that plastics are causing a huge decrease in birthrates is that these plastics have been a part of our daily lives for decades. So all of the sudden, the plastics are causing a 30, 40, or 60% drop in birth rates, and an exponential increase in still born babies? C'mon man. That is much more far fetched than the possibility that the vaxx is causing it.

Wait a minute can you clear up which country you are talking about that has suffered a 60% drop in birth rate in the last 3 years

As nothing bothers me more when trying to ascertain facts then typical MSM hyperbole

a reply to: UpThenDown

Wait a minute can you clear up which country you are talking about that has suffered a 60% drop in birth rate in the last 3 years

This is what happens when peeps entertain the sort of tripe presented at the likes of "Beforeitsnews.com".

They are apt to believe just about anything.

a reply to: andy06shake

No need to try to insult me...

I have already said that the majority of what passes for news at ATS is total Bull#.

So to answer, let's let someone from the Australian Parliament speak about it.

rumble.com...

a reply to: MaxxAction

No need to try to insult me...

Was not intended as an insult per say more a statement of fact pertaining to the sorts of people willing to entertain the topics and sources of information presented at the site "Beforeitsnews.com".

I have already said that the majority of what passes for new at ATS is total Bull#.

The caliber of articles did seem to be far superior in days gone by here at ATS.

So to answer, let's let someone from the Australian Parliament speak about it.

Do you actually believe a 67% reduction in Australian birth rates?

Because the person answering the questions in your own video clearly states that the data does not align or allude to such.