Welp- that didn't take long...

We have fair elections. Someone just wasn't man enough to accept defeat.

originally posted by: ussmidway
We have fair elections. Someone just wasn't man enough to accept defeat.

Butwait...

Today's Elections

are not finished 😃

a reply to: TrueAmerican

My question is what happens when bin #3 fills up with ballots to the point no more can be slid in to it? Do they replace that bin? How is that secured? What do they do with removed bin while waiting for the end of the night so they can take it to be counted?

a reply to: Identified

I guess you did not see the 3 am curve go on last election? The DOJ and FBI had nothing to say about that, except they supported dems.

so what about this is so wrong? hows it denying votes?

originally posted by: Identified
a reply to: TrueAmerican

My question is what happens when bin #3 fills up with ballots to the point no more can be slid in to it? Do they replace that bin? How is that secured? What do they do with removed bin while waiting for the end of the night so they can take it to be counted?

Damn good questions, and your guess is as good as mine. Dunno.

But I am reading other reports of severely under equipped voting places, causing long lines, horrible wait times, and people leaving, Never thought of that. If they suspected a red wave, simply under equip the voting place. On purpose. They gotta be paying people to come up with these ideas. With two years to prepare, this is gross incompetence, or flat out election fraud. No. Just no.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: ussmidway
We have fair elections. Someone just wasn't man enough to accept defeat.

Butwait...

Today's Elections

are not finished 😃

you Republicans wanted to stick to paper ballots so what are you going on about?

a reply to: kwakakev
Yeah, It will be one of those, - Don't worry about it, we are just going to place these ballots that are clogging up this bin, into this mail bin and carry it on over to headquarters. But first we gotta run around the county picking up the other clogged #3 bins. It's totally secure. What's the problem here?

I am amazed that these election officials still don't understand the issue with the appearance of security much less the actual security.

originally posted by: namehere
so what about this is so wrong? hows it denying votes?

🤣🤣🤣🤣 knee hits jaw. jaw breaks. neck gets numb.

originally posted by: TrueAmerican

originally posted by: Identified
a reply to: TrueAmerican

My question is what happens when bin #3 fills up with ballots to the point no more can be slid in to it? Do they replace that bin? How is that secured? What do they do with removed bin while waiting for the end of the night so they can take it to be counted?

Damn good questions, and your guess is as good as mine. Dunno.

But I am reading other reports of severely under equipped voting places, causing long lines, horrible wait times, and people leaving, Never thought of that. If they suspected a red wave, simply under equip the voting place. On purpose. They gotta be paying people to come up with these ideas. With two years to prepare, this is gross incompetence, or flat out election fraud. No. Just no.

who wanted paper ballots? only yourselves to blame for these issues. if people could vote online none of this would be an issue.

maricopa again, I am shocked.

THose machines are not safe, those machines are only as reliable and honest as the people that set them up and load the software, considering most voting regions are handled by volunteers well how do you find the bad and fix the problems, well you call dominion and hope the techs are good honest people.

originally posted by: ussmidway
We have fair elections. Someone just wasn't man enough to accept defeat.

I know, right?

a reply to: TrueAmerican

That is my issue with this all, that it seems as if these officials are like so many in the workforce today and they simply have no pride in doing their job correctly. They shrug their shoulders and say "don't worry we have door #3."

I'm all for built in redundancy and mediation but this is just not acceptable for any professional area and is going to be a problem because I'm sure this level of failure was not naturally built in because no one should have signed off on it if it was.

a reply to: xuenchen

Here in N.J. , you Do have the Option of Not Casting your Vote at the Polls on their Voting Machines . After you Sign the Registry Book , you have the Option of Filling Out your Ballot Right then and there with a PAPER BALLOT if you so Choose . You then give it to them In PERSON and be on your way . Is this Not True in other States ? Hmm........

a reply to: Identified

Yep. You have 2 years to prepare for 1 day. You have 1 job that must happen on that 1 day. When you fail, you have failed 100% in 100% of your duties. Those in charge of this election are failures. And if they are all republicans, that changes nothing. This should be such a simple process, third world nations can get it right, why can't we?

a reply to: namehere

This isn't about paper ballots. Pay attention. This is a machine that is having a 20% rejection rate. 20% rejection is not acceptable under any standards for this sort of mechanism. Then to add to it this isn't about counting rejected paper ballots, it's about how these ballots are being secured after removed from the box #3 and when they will be counted.

If they were properly handled from the start because they knew they were all going to be paper ballots then that is fine. We would all know they mechanism and understand how security is being handle. They would have the people ready to deal with the large number of paper ballots. But they do not have a mechanism that they have conveyed to anyone that proves they will be able to handle this level of rejection and they certainly didn't expect a 20% rejection and have the proper people in the numbers required to handle this.


It's also about why some people find this sort of incompetence acceptable.

Voting machines should be outlawed.

No other country uses them to such an extent. With the notable exception of Venezeula, which is a dictatorship whose elections are a complete joke. Tells you all you need to know really.

The rest of the world gets by just fine with paper and pen.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: namehere
so what about this is so wrong? hows it denying votes?

🤣🤣🤣🤣 knee hits jaw. jaw breaks. neck gets numb.

well?

a reply to: ussmidway
No one believes you “used to be a Republican”.

Give it up already.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
maricopa again, I am shocked.

THose machines are not safe, those machines are only as reliable and honest as the people that set them up and load the software, considering most voting regions are handled by volunteers well how do you find the bad and fix the problems, well you call dominion and hope the techs are good honest people.

I think one look at the darn name of that place pretty much says it all:

DOMINION

not
FAIR ELECTION SYSTEMS
nope.

not
RELIABLE VOTING SYSTEMS
nope.

not
HACKPROOF VOTING SYSTEMS
nope.

but DOMINION.

They might as well have settled on
NWO VOTING SYSTEMS