I Know That Everyday I Wake Up There Will Be Scores Of New Sudden And Unexpected Deaths

originally posted by: easyV

a reply to: fencesitter85

The cognitive dissonance on this thread is palpable

Playback error...

ATTENTION

I don't know how it is that people can't understand that opinions of each other are not the topic on ATS - EVER - but it's close to time to start issuing Posting Bans to those who ignore this.

BE WARNED IF YOUR POST IS NOT ON TOPIC AND IS ABOUT OTHER MEMBERS YOU MAY BE ABOUT TO BE POST BANNED!

Everyone and I mean everyone is allowed to post here on topic and to do so without being called names or becoming the target of others' posts. Debate the topic and leave each other out of it.

The topic is I Know That Everyday I Wake Up There Will Be Scores Of New Sudden And Unexpected Deaths

These rules apply to all threads and if you want to engage in personal attacks there are other sites on the Internet where you can do that. Our goal is for ATS to be above that. For members here to post like mature adults.
YOU are responsible for your own posts

And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.

originally posted by: anonentity


The stats are fairly robust, The Japanese study backs up the German study of a seven percent injury rate, and seven percent extra sickness rate in the general population. So with one shot, the probability of an injury is seven percent, the second shot fourteen percent third shot twenty-one percent. fourth shot twenty-eight and so on till your luck runs out.

I don't think that is how math works... but OK...

Healthy 6 year old dies from massive stroke:

dailyheadlines.com...

a reply to: Xtrozero

That's how probability outcomes work. Over long number progressions. If there was a bet on how many out of a hundred that took the shot were going to have ongoing complications. You know by the research it is seven percent. You also know if that hundred took another shot another seven percent will be affected.That's fourteen percent with two shots , working the rest out isn't that difficult.

originally posted by: anonentity

Are we including sore arm as a complication?? If so, I believe you. I'll even believe a few days of a fever or just feeling like poo. Beyond that, it's just not happening.

originally posted by: anonentity

That's how probability outcomes work. Over long number progressions. If there was a bet on how many out of a hundred that took the shot were going to have ongoing complications. You know by the research it is seven percent. You also know if that hundred took another shot another seven percent will be affected.That's fourteen percent with two shots , working the rest out isn't that difficult.

Well first it is not 7% unless you are counting very minor reactions too. As example myocarditis is 8.5 out of a million so like 0.000845%. Combining all conditions we would say are on the serious side is still extremely small percentage of well below 1%, so what are you suggesting with 7% or 7 out of every 100, when we really say X out of a million as to what really represents a better understand of chances that are well below 1%.

Also 7% twice is not now 14% it is 13.5%, 7% 5 times is 30%, 7% 10 times is not 70%, it is 51.5%.... That would be each time you got a shot on a 7% chance, but your overall percentage is still 7%. So it seems probability is a little more difficult for you then you think.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: anonentity

That's how probability outcomes work. Over long number progressions. If there was a bet on how many out of a hundred that took the shot were going to have ongoing complications. You know by the research it is seven percent. You also know if that hundred took another shot another seven percent will be affected.That's fourteen percent with two shots , working the rest out isn't that difficult.

Well first it is not 7% unless you are counting very minor reactions too. As example myocarditis is 8.5 out of a million so like 0.000845%. Combining all conditions we would say are on the serious side is still extremely small percentage of well below 1%, so what are you suggesting with 7% or 7 out of every 100, when we really say X out of a million as to what really represents a better understand of chances that are well below 1%.

Also 7% twice is not now 14% it is 13.5%, 7% 5 times is 30%, 7% 10 times is not 70%, it is 51.5%.... That would be each time you got a shot on a 7% chance, but your overall percentage is still 7%. So it seems probability is a little more difficult for you then you think.

It is 7% based on many different data sources validating eachother, including the CDC's own v safe data that they had to be sued to release. There are 39 safety systems around the world that are all consistent.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

It is 7% based on many different data sources validating eachother, including the CDC's own v safe data that they had to be sued to release. There are 39 safety systems around the world that are all consistent.

You didn't answer my question... 7% of what? What is included in that 7%... Reread my post again...

a reply to: Xtrozero

Seven percent of those that have the vax have long-term complications needing ongoing medical attention. By working out the possibilities you get a cascading effect on many systems in a complex society. Let's look at the medical system. Which is a good one to start with.
They are mandated, ten percent of the staff leave. They are down ten percent...... Seven percent get sick and leave work ...they are now down seventeen percent....they are servicing a mostly mandated population which will increase their workload by the magic seven percent., their workload increases seven percent..... now they are operating with an extra loading of the seventeen percent plus the seven. so the medical system is now operating with an extra; loading of twenty-five percent. This is on one shot of the juice. second shot and boosters should finish the society off with these figures.
This isn't counting the dead.

Cover up to hide facts in UK .

Leading Figure in British Heart Foundation is Suppressing Evidence of Vaccine Heart Damage, Says MP

a reply to: Kenzo

Funny that a month before his accusations this happened?

www.theguardian.com...

The Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen faces suspension from the House of Commons and has been asked to apologise after a cross-party committee found that he repeatedly breached rules on paid lobbying and declaring interests.

The standards committee endorsed findings from Kathryn Stone, the parliamentary commissioner for standards, that Bridgen broke the MPs’ code of conduct after he approached ministers and officials on behalf of a forestry company that had given him a donation, a visit to Ghana and the offer of an advisory contract.

There's also the response from the BHF..

We do not recognise these claims and strongly refute all allegations made about colleagues in seniour leadership roles within the British Heart Foundation (BHF).

…We would encourage those making these serious allegations to share specific, credible information with us which supports them…

More from the response..

The BHF is here responding a claim made by Andrew Bridgen MP in Parliament last night that someone with “a prominent leadership role with the British Heart Foundation” is the lead at a cardiology research department that “is covering up clear data that reveals that the mRNA vaccine increases inflammation of the heart arteries”. This was based on the word of a unnamed “whistleblower”; Bridgen did not go into specific details, and it appears that he has made no attempt to raise the matter privately anywhere.

a reply to: Kurokage

And BHF.. and it's senior members do not have any Commercial or financial motivation to issue a release like that.

Thailand princess collapses suddenly at 44:

stevekirsch.substack.com...

29 year old dies unexpectedly:

www.bemidjipioneer.com...

originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: Kurokage

And BHF.. and it's senior members do not have any Commercial or financial motivation to issue a release like that.

The British Heart Foundation...

The British Heart Foundation (BHF) is a cardiovascular research charity in the United Kingdom. It funds medical research related to heart and circulatory diseases and their risk factors, and runs influencing work aimed at shaping public policy and raising awareness.

In 2021, a study conducted by YouGov ranked the British Heart Foundation as the top charity or organisation in the UK by % of adults who hold a positive opinion of the organisation.

Jake Hescock 25

Jack Lasts death caused by vaccine according to coroner:

www.itv.com...

originally posted by: anonentity

Seven percent of those that have the vax have long-term complications needing ongoing medical attention. By working out the possibilities you get a cascading effect on many systems in a complex society. Let's look at the medical system. Which is a good one to start with.

So close to a billion people, is that what you calculated? Where they all at? I really think you should not use math as much as you do.