It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
The term doom porn is another made up phrase to reduce criticism and obstruct the objective of a conversation. I don't think that the totalitarian state we have lived in the last 2-3 years can be compared with the criticisms and concerns people have over this matter.
Nuremberg 2.0 I propose. Far from being doom porn (whether this means). Already discussed elsewhere.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
The term doom porn is another made up phrase to reduce criticism and obstruct the objective of a conversation. I don't think that the totalitarian state we have lived in the last 2-3 years can be compared with the criticisms and concerns people have over this matter.
Call it what you will, both side when way overboard. I do agree the totalitarian state was by far the worst of the two and drove the other side to push back well beyond what would normally be needed, but in either case they both need to turn down the flames.
Nuremberg 2.0 I propose. Far from being doom porn (whether this means). Already discussed elsewhere.
The doom porn is how bad people suggest the vaccine is which is a totally different discussion to Nuremberg 2.0. Doom porn is like saying millions of people are dropping dead from the vaccine, filling up the streets kind of crap and people follow these conversations all day...
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
The only thing is that this isn't something many of us recognise as valid language not most of us claim that everyone will be dead from the vaccines.
That is probably strawman attempts by the same people who want to downplay this serious issue.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
The term doom porn is another made up phrase to reduce criticism and obstruct the objective of a conversation. I don't think that the totalitarian state we have lived in the last 2-3 years can be compared with the criticisms and concerns people have over this matter.
Call it what you will, both side when way overboard. I do agree the totalitarian state was by far the worst of the two and drove the other side to push back well beyond what would normally be needed, but in either case they both need to turn down the flames.
Nuremberg 2.0 I propose. Far from being doom porn (whether this means). Already discussed elsewhere.
The doom porn is how bad people suggest the vaccine is which is a totally different discussion to Nuremberg 2.0. Doom porn is like saying millions of people are dropping dead from the vaccine, filling up the streets kind of crap and people follow these conversations all day...
The only thing is that this isn't something many of us recognise as valid language not most of us claim that everyone will be dead from the vaccines.
That is probably strawman attempts by the same people who want to downplay this serious issue.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
The only thing is that this isn't something many of us recognise as valid language not most of us claim that everyone will be dead from the vaccines.
That is probably strawman attempts by the same people who want to downplay this serious issue.
Which serious issue? If you are not pushing the vaccine will kill everyone, not referring to yourself as "pureblood", don't add stories like people are dying all around me to the vaccine etc. etc. then you are not pushing doom porn.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Don't you see any serious issue or serious issues in regards to public health? Or in regards to the anomalous situation we had to live in the last 3 years?
There are lots of different ones, which do you wish to discuss...
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
We are already discussing these issues in several threads if you have a look around.
This thread is about the idea that nobody can be fully vaccinated according to one of the experts. It's seems that being fully vaccinated is offensive language according to this strange ideology.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
We are already discussing these issues in several threads if you have a look around.
This thread is about the idea that nobody can be fully vaccinated according to one of the experts. It's seems that being fully vaccinated is offensive language according to this strange ideology.
I am fully aware of all the issues...
I said in an earlier post that what drives Pure, Leaky, Not Fully Vaccinated has more to do with the virus type than anything else. We have never been fully vacced against the cold/flu and 100 of other viruses either and no one cared, as example. It is what it is when we are talking a RNA based virus.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Flu is an RNA virus that the elderly get one shot once a year. Not multiple times for the same strain.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Flu is an RNA virus that the elderly get one shot once a year. Not multiple times for the same strain.
Flu is a hit or miss approach where early on they do their best WAG as to the top 3 flu viruses they "think" will be the dominate strains, that's it and why it is one shot per year. They do this because their method takes months to prep and so they have no time during the actual flu season to change up if they miss. mRNA is different in it takes them like hours to prep, so in this case they can change up basically instantly when needed. I'm not here to suggest this is right or wrong, but that is why they can do 3 times a year or more if needed and the older flu shot is only done once.