Breaking- Russian Black Sea Fleet Attacked at Sevastapol- Crimea

twitter.com...

twitter.com...

twitter.com...

Reports are that it was by air and sea drones, but may also have been hit by missiles. Fog of war, developing story.

But nonetheless, this shows that Ukraine has reached far enough south to pull this off- or- did the US just do it? Some are claiming it was coordinated by a US Global Hawk in the area. Putin's not gonna be a happy camper either way.

The war now has entered the missile to missile zone and drone to drone of mirror in the sky type of war.
Russia will be at the drawing boards up till the American election is near voting time. Then we will actually see what war is all about there. Right now, we are only getting 2 to 3 second clips of war damage. Soon when the international reporters are told to get the hell out of Ukraine, then that is when we might actually see some combat that is NOT CHILDS PLAY.
You don't mess with Russia, China or America. You just don't.

a reply to: TrueAmerican
Except that footage has already been debunked as footage from the Danish military blowing up one of their own ships from 2013.
Link to report and fottage
Posted on ATS here
Rainbows
Jane

originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: TrueAmerican
Except that footage has already been debunked as footage from the Danish military blowing up one of their own ships from 2013.
Link to report and fottage
Posted on ATS here
Rainbows
Jane

OK , thanks. Good find.

Being reported as no damage to the fleet or city.

The attack was repelled.

a reply to: angelchemuel

Not same footage. And although the Russians are claiming all drones were shot down, damage pictures from many other videos are proving otherwise, or that some water drones got through.

More pics of burning port here:
twitter.com...

a reply to: angelchemuel

Ships do not look the same though , in the OP video there is a rotating radar disk

Wich is absent in the decommisioned ship.

Since the beginning of the Ukraine Invasion in February, the Russian Navy’s four Improved-Kilo Class submarines in the Black Sea have been a regular sight in Sevastopol. The major naval base on Crimea’s west coast has been a starting point for many attacks on Ukraine. The Kilos have dedicated berths there, where they rearm with Kalibr land-attack cruise missiles.

Until recently it was not unusual to see three Kilos in the port at once, with one at sea. That has changed.

Article

The Russians wisely withdrew the submarine element of their Black Sea Fleet from Sevastopol. But it is possible the amphibious ships in that fleet are employed in a logistical and resupply role for Russian forces in Ukraine. So the Ukrainians attacking those vessels would serve their goal of destroying Russia's supply lines and limited logistical capabilities.

Just more anti russian propaganda.

originally posted by: musicismagic
You don't mess with Russia, China or America. You just don't.

Chinese armed forces of late have perfected internal repression. Russian armed forces of late have been stopped and humiliated by Ukraine. US armed forces of late are sitting back.

a reply to: TrueAmerican
That's not a burning port! Are you being funny? I can make that much smoke burning a single tyre!
Lol!
Rainbows
Jane

Another link to an Artical

mil.in.ua/en/news/

No real info on any damages, although there were explosions, and i take it back... seems there was damage.

According to the Russian Telegram channel, which tracks marine topics, as a result of the drone attack, the minesweeper and the Admiral Makarov missile frigate, which is actually the flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, were damaged.

a reply to: TheGreazel
Regardless of whether either ship has a rotating radar beacon or not, the Muskova was targeted and sank in APRIL this year. The Admiral Makarov as reported in the OP links, was open to speculation in MAY that it had been hit. It however wasn't and replaced the Muskova as the flagship in the Black Sea.
Link
All I'm saying is, if the second flagship has been hit yesterday and Sevastapol is under attack by Ukraine it would be all over the MSM and notched up as a victory by the West. It isn't so I'll wait for more reliable info than film footage of either the Danish or Muskova ship being peddled as film footage of the Makarov being blown to bits.
Oh and lookee here, a simple search of the Admiral Makarov not only shows its current location as being in northern Russia.... it's also an Ice Breaker!
So do the Russians have two ships named Admiral Makarov?
Link with photo from AIS
Confusion rules.....


Rainbows
Jane

a reply to: angelchemuel

Hmm, may be more than one ship with that name.

en.wikipedia.org...

Cheers

originally posted by: TrueAmerican
twitter.com...

twitter.com...

twitter.com...

Reports are that it was by air and sea drones, but may also have been hit by missiles. Fog of war, developing story.

But nonetheless, this shows that Ukraine has reached far enough south to pull this off- or- did the US just do it? Some are claiming it was coordinated by a US Global Hawk in the area. Putin's not gonna be a happy camper either way.

Does Ukraine not have a news agency?

I don't trust this Twitter news that anyone can just post their fantasies....

I wouldn't trust their news agency either, but...

a reply to: TrueAmerican

But nonetheless, this shows that Ukraine has reached far enough south to pull this off- or- did the US just do it?

Let’s face it, this conflict would be over and done with if Ukraine wasn’t receiving the support of the US and allies.

On another note when AI is pared with these drones and bots it will be unstoppable. They better hope it doesn’t turn against its masters.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Russia admits "massive" attack, blames RN.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
www.telegraph.co.uk...

Russia admits "massive" attack, blames RN.

Yet all they damaged was a civilian trawler and a net boom.

Incompetent British terrorists.

I’m doubtful on this. Something this big would have been leaked to news with confirmation by intelligence sources.
There are a lot of eyes on that area, twitter just won’t cut it as the first source IMO.

I think if we source twitter, YouTube, but chute, ect. We need to be honest and say alleged, it’s possible that, or other wording in our threads to highlight these are unconfirmed. I’d like to see the same wording with big news sources too as they’ve proven to get things wrong or exaggerate claimed as well, but I know if there are multiple sources it’s rare to see.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Russia has admitted it happened?

www.bbc.co.uk...