Evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 hasn't naturally evolved

The Evidence which Suggests that This Is No Naturally Evolved Virus

A Reconstructed Historical Aetiology of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike

Birger Sørensen, Angus Dalgleish & Andres Susrud Immunor & St Georges University of London

ABSTRACT: To discover exactly how to attack SARS-CoV-2 safely and efficiently, our vaccine candidate Biovacc-19 was designed by first carefully analysing the biochemistry of the Spike. We ascertained that it is highly unusual in several respects, unlike any other CoV in its clade. The SARS-CoV-2 general mode of action is as a co-receptor dependent phagocyte. But data shows that simultaneously it is capable of binding to ACE2 receptors in its receptor binding domain. In short, SARS-CoV-2 is possessed of dual action capability. In this paper we argue that the likelihood of this being the result of natural processes is very small. The spike has six inserts which are unique fingerprints with five salient features indicative of purposive manipulation. We then add to the bio-chemistry a diachronic dimension by analysing a sequence of four linked published research projects which, we suggest, show by deduction how, where, when and by whom the SARS-CoV-2 Spike acquired its special characteristics. This reconstructed historical aetiology meets the criteria of means, timing, agent and place to produce sufficient confidence to reverse the burden of proof. Henceforth, those who would maintain that the Covid-19 pandemic arose from zoonotic transfer need to explain precisely why this more parsimonious account is wrong before asserting that their evidence is persuasive, most especially when, as we also show, there are puzzling errors in their use of evidence.

The claim that SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic virus i.e that it has naturally evolved and jumped from animals to humans is a hypothesis which has been asserted without any evidence to support it. This is still an unsubstantiated hypothesis that has been propagated as a fact, however there is no proof that the virus that causes Covid-19 has made the jump from animals to humans.

One of the most important features of SARS-CoV-2 is it's dual action capability i.e to be able to bind to the ACE2 receptors in its receptor binding domain and at the same time its general mode of action is as a co-receptor dependent phagocyte. The chance it possesses a dual action capability and this being a result of the natural processes is very small.

One of the furin-cleavage sites of the spike protein is known to greatly enhance viral infectivity and cell tropism. However this cleavage site is completely absent in these classes of coronaviruses found in nature.






news.ycombinator.com...

www.business-standard.com...

www.news-medical.net...

a reply to: Asmodeus3


Also, according to theLancet Commission, COVID-19 may have escaped from U.S. bio lab:

originally posted by: karl 12
a reply to: Asmodeus3


Also, according to theLancet Commission, COVID-19 may have escaped from U.S. bio lab:

There is plenty of discussion about this hypothesis. Initially it was regarded as a conspiracy theory by the...media and those who have never opened a book in their lives.

What was it that Holmes said to Watson?

"It now appears we have a firm grasp of the obvious."

originally posted by: MaxxAction
What was it that Holmes said to Watson?

"It now appears we have a firm grasp of the obvious."

I don't think it is obvious but the accepted hypothesis i.e that SARS-CoV-2 naturally evolved and the pandemic started through zoonotic transfer is just an assertion and hasn't been proven anywhere. So there is no proof yet one way or the other but the claim that SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic virus is just a convenient assertion with zero evidence.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

You may be surprised to know that I agree with you on this.

I'm not sure we will ever know for sure what the real source of it was but it's certainly something that is not yet established in my mind.

no surprise that scientists have trouble admitting creation over evolution.

Around Feb 2020 it was looking pretty clear for me that this is the result of gain of function research. Too many genetic anomalies for natural evolution. She Zeng Li, the Bat lady who was in charge at the Wuhan lab took initial control of the situation, has a well published history around bat coronaviruses. Long history and lot of contracts with gain of function research in the USA, more recently China. Event 201 prepared a lot of the main players through the script.

In the Fauci emails that where released a while back, Fauci and Peter Dasek where a couple of the main people pushing the natural evolution theory, throw the public off the track of what really happened. With the propaganda assault against products like HCQ and Ivermectin it was also clear to stay away from the vax.

originally posted by: juulzverne
no surprise that scientists have trouble admitting creation over evolution.

There is more into this but I will create another thread when this matter has been discussed properly.

originally posted by: kwakakev
Around Feb 2020 it was looking pretty clear for me that this is the result of gain of function research. Too many genetic anomalies for natural evolution. She Zeng Li, the Bat lady who was in charge at the Wuhan lab took initial control of the situation, has a well published history around bat coronaviruses. Long history and lot of contracts with gain of function research in the USA, more recently China. Event 201 prepared a lot of the main players through the script.

In the Fauci emails that where released a while back, Fauci and Peter Dasek where a couple of the main people pushing the natural evolution theory, throw the public off the track of what really happened. With the propaganda assault against products like HCQ and Ivermectin it was also clear to stay away from the vax.

If you have any good links please post them here. In relation to the natural evolution of the virus hypothesis one needs to consider what evidence exists. There is none and this hypothesis has been asserted as fact and propagated in the media.

If it is a result of gain of functions then this should be a matter of an international criminal investigation with the strongest penalties to all those who participated in the creation of the virus, cover up, promotion of disinformation and propaganda.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I have no doubt the virus originated and was purposely developed in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The usual shills won't touch this thread with a barge pole.

This guy..lol

Okee buddie..
a reply to: Asmodeus3

a reply to: Asmodeus3

One long starting point is this thread on ATS:

Corona Virus Updates

It is currently up to its 6th thread as there has been a lot of discussion, links and input about the evolving covid situation. This thread did start a bit late in the pandemic so misses some of the early stuff going around at the start. Otherwise it is a good collective journal as covid events have gone over the past couple of years.

originally posted by: Faeded
This guy..lol

Okee buddie..
a reply to: Asmodeus3

You want to comment on the paper?
Maybe explain what you mean by 'Okee buddie' as I don't understand what is your stand on this.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

One video looking into the evidence for one of the main papers used to set the media narrative around natural evolution:

Dr. CHRIS MARTENSON ANALYZES THE FAUCI COVER-UP EMAILS BETWEEN BILL GATES, W.H.O. AND UNITED NATIONS ON THE WORLD-WIDE CORONA VIRUS ATTACK; REFER FAUCI AND CO-CONSPIRATORS TO INTL CRIMINAL COURT

www.news-medical.net...

The furin cleavage site

The SARS-CoV-2 is a betacoronavirus, and is most closely related to the bat SARS-related coronavirus (SARSr-CoV) represented by the genome sequence RaTG13, which shares 96% identity with the former. This has made the bat virus the most probable precursor of the virus in current circulation.

The origin of this strain is linked to the emergence of the novel furin cleavage site in the viral spike glycoprotein. The furin is a serine protease widely expressed in human cells, that cleaves the SARS-CoV-2 spike at the interface of its two subunits. It is encoded by a gene on chromosome 15.

Furin acts on substrates with single or paired basic residues during the processing of proteins within cells. Such a polybasic furin cleavage site is found in various proteins from many viruses, including Betacoronavirus Embecoviruses, and the Merbecovirus. However, within the betacoronaviruses of the sarbecovirus lineage B, this type of site is unique to SARS-CoV-2.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Through everything I have read...

There has never been a naturally occurring virus that has the number of ways to attack the human body that Sars Cov2 does. It was designed to have affinity for:

ACE-2 Receptors
Furyn Enzyme Cleavage
GRP78 Receptors
CD147 receptors

Not to mention that the original variant was "Neuro-invasive" meaning it could travel the nerves from one area of the body to another, lungs to brain for example.

Someone tried to reason that this level of diversity points to natural occurrence. Maybe, had it been passed back and forth from a bat to a human, to a pangolin, to a rat, back to a human, but barring that, I don't think it was zoonotic or naturally occurring.

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: Asmodeus3

One video looking into the evidence for one of the main papers used to set the media narrative around natural evolution:

Dr. CHRIS MARTENSON ANALYZES THE FAUCI COVER-UP EMAILS BETWEEN BILL GATES, W.H.O. AND UNITED NATIONS ON THE WORLD-WIDE CORONA VIRUS ATTACK; REFER FAUCI AND CO-CONSPIRATORS TO INTL CRIMINAL COURT

Thanks for the link.
I am aware of the video by the way but a good source anyway.

The not surprising but very interesting point is that the NIH knew about the particular research in the gain of function that was approved by the NIH and continued as normal regardless of the testimony by Fauci in the Senate Committee who testified that there is no such thing and we don't do this kind of research.

This is what Kary Mullis said about Fauci in an interview back in 1996. I have referred to him in another thread of mine but it worths the effort to have a look at it again and again. Mullis discovered the PCR for which he got the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

youtu.be...

Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking. He doesn't know anything really about anything, and I have to say that to his face, nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it got a virus there, you will know it. He doesn't understand electron microscopy and he doesn't understand medicine, and he should not be in the position he is. Most of those guys that are on the top are total administrative people and don't know anything about what is going on.

originally posted by: MaxxAction
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Through everything I have read...

There has never been a naturally occurring virus that has the number of ways to attack the human body that Sars Cov2 does. It was designed to have affinity for:

ACE-2 Receptors
Furyn Enzyme Cleavage
GRP78 Receptors
CD147 receptors

Not to mention that the original variant was "Neuro-invasive" meaning it could travel the nerves from one area of the body to another, lungs to brain for example.

Someone tried to reason that this level of diversity points to natural occurrence. Maybe, had it been passed back and forth from a bat to a human, to a pangolin, to a rat, back to a human, but barring that, I don't think it was zoonotic or naturally occurring.

It's the opposite actually in terms of the probabilities as the dual action capability of SARS-CoV-2 and its very unusual characteristics point to the direction of the gain of function research and development rather than a naturally evolved zoonotic virus.

David Martin has been following the Sars patents and development of covid for 20 years. It's been an ongoing process in the lab from the furin cleavage site to the hiv protein inserts.