Kary Mullis heavily criticising Anthony Fauci

a reply to: tanstaafl

Why thankyou for thanking me.

It's not hard to do but it does take some of my time so it's good to know my efforts are appreciated.

Most folks just get angry and call me a troll or a shill so it's nice to get someone saying something pleasant for a change.

originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: tanstaafl

Why thankyou for thanking me.

It's not hard to do but it does take some of my time so it's good to know my efforts are appreciated.

Most folks just get angry and call me a troll or a shill so it's nice to get someone saying something pleasant for a change.

The efforts you put is to try to attack scientists because their research and arguments don't fit your beliefs and ideologies and you call them quacks and crackpots having admitted you are a layman.
These are self defeating arguments.

Yesterday you have called Kary Mullis a climate change denier.... No evidence exists that he is one such guy and your attempts are desperate in order to find something to attack him as you believe that character assassination works.

By your own logic, Einstein wasn't a great and good as he wasn't the best husband... These are your attempts to extrapolate conclusions.

You also claimed that Mullis was an astrology guy. He was not such thing. The reason you try so hard is to make a connection between this and the criticisms of Fauci by Mullis. As there is any connection at all. There is none. Even if Mullis believed in the zodiac cycle his arguments and criticisms of the scientific and medical establishment and of Fauci are still valid.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I'm going to ask you to do something you don't normally do here if you can.

Stop thinking that you know everything and have to be the "winner" and actually read what's in the link I'm putting below.

It's not very long and won't take all that long and you should like it as well as it's written by Karry Mullis himself.

It is from his autobiography.

When you've read it you can tell me what you think or keep your opinions private.

Link

a reply to: nonspecific
The reviews for his book are well worth a read:
www.amazon.co.uk...

Delightful . . . joyous . . . an autobiography of the nervous system of an extraordinary chemist. --The New York Times Book Review

One of the most mind-stretching and inspirational books I've read for a long time. --Arthur C. Clarke

Thanks for letting me know that he wrote an autobiography

a reply to: Itisnowagain

From what I've read its a good book.

He was interesting, he led a pretty cool life from what I understand.

originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I'm going to ask you to do something you don't normally do here if you can.

Stop thinking that you know everything and have to be the "winner" and actually read what's in the link I'm putting below.

It's not very long and won't take all that long and you should like it as well as it's written by Karry Mullis himself.

It is from his autobiography.

When you've read it you can tell me what you think or keep your opinions private.

Link

It's someone I met by the way in the pre-covid era.

originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: Itisnowagain

From what I've read its a good book.

He was interesting, he led a pretty cool life from what I understand.

Here is a comment in the site you linked

What a great man. If only the scientific and academic world had more people like Kary. Truly a free thinker and with a moral backbone that is sadly lacking in most of the establishment. Science snd academia need a total overhaul. Individuality, free thinking and constant questioning and testing of theories without fear of reprisal is essential. Kary Mullis is a very sad loss to the world.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

It must of been both interesting and an honour to meet him, he was a special man if a little eccentric.

I'm surprised you didn't know about the astrology.

And yes, there's lots of good things said about him on the link.

It's bad enough that we have blogs and bit chute videos used as evidence here these days, lets not start using amazon reviews as anything other than for a reference when looking to make a purchase shall we

originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: Asmodeus3

It must of been both interesting and an honour to meet him, he was a special man if a little eccentric.

I'm surprised you didn't know about the astrology.

And yes, there's lots of good things said about him on the link.

It's bad enough that we have blogs and bit chute videos used as evidence here these days, lets not start using amazon reviews as anything other than for a reference when looking to make a purchase shall we

You have given me this site where there are reviews, so I can use them. If anything it proves my point.

He has been misunderstood and misrepresented by others who don't understand science and research. It's as simple as that. They don't even understand the basics to add a little more on this.

His criticisms of Fauci are legitimate as there plenty more able scientists who should have been in the positions of power and influence and certainly not Fauci and co.

In relation to the other matters in the book and especially HIV and AIDS one has to be able to understand what Mullis has said. Apart from this, one must have some good knowledge of molecular biology and retroviruses. HIV is one such retrovirus. Retroviruses are RNA viruses and when infect a cell they use an enzyme called reverse transcriptase to convert their genome into DNA. Then it is integrated into the genome of the host cell. Retroviruses are known for not being pathogenic and have been pinpointed much earlier as probable cancer causing viruses. In the 60s and 70s they were researched a lot and it has been proven that in wild animals and humans they cause nothing. They just integrate their genome into the host cell genome.

The person who discovered HIV, Luc Montagnier, has also hinted that retroviruses don't do much. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the virus and there is nobody who has been awarded a similar prize for the causative link between HIV and AIDS. And that what Mullis discusses and has discussed since then. Who has proved that HIV caused AIDS and under what mechanism.

Strangely enough Professor Montagnier has been accused of spreading conspiracy theories as he claimed that SARS-COV-2 was created and leaked from a laboratory.

It seems that Nobel Prize Winners are involved in a lot of conspiracies in our days...

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: Asmodeus3

It must of been both interesting and an honour to meet him, he was a special man if a little eccentric.

I'm surprised you didn't know about the astrology.

And yes, there's lots of good things said about him on the link.

It's bad enough that we have blogs and bit chute videos used as evidence here these days, lets not start using amazon reviews as anything other than for a reference when looking to make a purchase shall we

You have given me this site where there are reviews, so I can use them. If anything it proves my point.

He has been misunderstood and misrepresented by others who don't understand science and research. It's as simple as that. They don't even understand the basics to add a little more on this.

His criticisms of Fauci are legitimate as there plenty more able scientists who should have been in the positions of power and influence and certainly not Fauci and co.

In relation to the other matters in the book and especially HIV and AIDS one has to be able to understand what Mullis has said. Apart from this, one must have some good knowledge of molecular biology and retroviruses. HIV is one such retrovirus. Retroviruses are RNA viruses and when infect a cell they use an enzyme called reverse transcriptase to convert their genome into DNA. Then it is integrated into the genome of the host cell. Retroviruses are known for not being pathogenic and have been pinpointed much earlier as probable cancer causing viruses. In the 60s and 70s they were researched a lot and it has been proven that in wild animals and humans they cause nothing. They just integrate their genome into the host cell genome.

The person who discovered HIV, Luc Montagnier, has also hinted that retroviruses don't do much. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the virus and there is nobody who has been awarded a similar prize for the causative link between HIV and AIDS. And that what Mullis discusses and has discussed since then. Who has proved that HIV caused AIDS and under what mechanism.

Strangely enough Professor Montagnier has been accused of spreading conspiracy theories as he claimed that SARS-COV-2 was created and leaked from a laboratory.

It seems that Nobel Prize Winners are involved in a lot of conspiracies in our days...

Yeah, ivermectin, Nobel prize winning drug and drug on list of WHO essential medicines, is a dangerous conspiracy theory.

Mulis, Nobel prize winner, is a crackpot, who knows less than fauci who is basically just a figurehead with zero medical experience.


Jesus Christ, the mass formation is so bad people don't bat an eye when they dismiss people of this caliber but absolute worship every word mainstream media says.

You can't expect the sheep to really respect the best and the brightest. They don't know the difference really. I mean I like humans, don't get me wrong, but basically the vast majority of them do not possess the ability who is and who isn't a really good scientist

This is in my my opening page and part what Mullis said in his interview.

It needs to reiterated again and again.