It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Oxford study cited in the article looked at how BMI (body mass index) impacted vaccine effectiveness. The detail about a 44 percent greater risk of infection after vaccination (circled in blue) was found in Table 7 of the supplemental material attached to it.
In her email to Lead Stories, study co-author Carmen Piernas, a postdoctoral researcher in Oxford University's Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, critiqued the article that cited their work, saying "you can tell these people don't really understand scientific research." Piernas has a Ph.D. in nutrition and epidemiology. She wrote:
It makes me sad that these people are picking out a few specific points to make their anti-vaxx arguments ...
So while the 44% higher risk of infection is the result we got and reported, we don't think this means much because of the lack of negative-tests in our analyses.
A national study has found that a significant proportion of clinically at-risk patients with certain immunocompromised or immunosuppressed conditions, mount a low, or undetectable, immune response after two doses of the same COVID-19 vaccine.
The ongoing multi-centre OCTAVE study is evaluating the immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as cancer, inflammatory arthritis, diseases of the kidney or liver, or patients who are having a stem cell transplant. Initial data from the study have been published on the Lancet pre-print site.
originally posted by: Antisocialist
a reply to: Boadicea
No, I think I found the correct study. It specifically mentions, discusses the 44% mentioned in the video.
originally posted by: anonentity
The valid research paper shows about 44% drop in the immune system. Alex Jones has some fun with regards to lizards, and a pro-vax doctor is now singing from a different hymn book. Jones maintains that it's all in the plan, to show about two years in that the vaccine was so bad that big pharma will be taken into a WHO committee for continual oversight, when that happens with the new legislation being rolled out, the WHO will be vaccine command center and they will override governments with regards to health issues. but it's too late as the job has been done.www.bitchute.com...
originally posted by: thethinkingman
claiming the vaccines ability to prevent mild or severe covid when 99+% of people would only have mild symptoms at best is absolutely dumbfounded.
Thats like claiming lemsip cured my cold because i eventually recovered. errrr no....immune system.
But this is what they're doing. Omgggg you have antibody levels omggggg gotta boost those antibody levels. herpderp. What you're less healthy if you're over weight omggggg revelations guys, wanna spend another few million to work that out? Oh what if you're like 85 and have several diseases, you can quite easily die??? oh but if you happen to test positive for covid??? hmmm OK.
originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: Boadicea
Here is the study.
Associations of BMI with COVID-19 vaccine uptake, vaccine effectiveness, and risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes after vaccination in England: a population-based cohort study
originally posted by: thethinkingman
claiming the vaccines ability to prevent mild or severe covid when 99+% of people would only have mild symptoms at best is absolutely dumbfounded.
Thats like claiming lemsip cured my cold because i eventually recovered. errrr no....immune system.
But this is what they're doing. Omgggg you have antibody levels omggggg gotta boost those antibody levels. herpderp. What you're less healthy if you're over weight omggggg revelations guys, wanna spend another few million to work that out? Oh what if you're like 85 and have several diseases, you can quite easily die??? oh but if you happen to test positive for covid??? hmmm OK.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: thethinkingman
claiming the vaccines ability to prevent mild or severe covid when 99+% of people would only have mild symptoms at best is absolutely dumbfounded.
Thats like claiming lemsip cured my cold because i eventually recovered. errrr no....immune system.
But this is what they're doing. Omgggg you have antibody levels omggggg gotta boost those antibody levels. herpderp. What you're less healthy if you're over weight omggggg revelations guys, wanna spend another few million to work that out? Oh what if you're like 85 and have several diseases, you can quite easily die??? oh but if you happen to test positive for covid??? hmmm OK.
Except the vaxx makes your immune system performance worse than if there was no vaxx. So instead of 99% chance of mild illness it's a "40% reduction in severe illness", so a 60% chance of mild illness instead of 99%.
originally posted by: nonspecific
I've just had a look at what I think is the correct study in question.
Either the esteemed Mr Jones has intentionally misunderstood and represented the results of the study or he is completely unable to comprehend the results and should not be attempting to voice an opinion on the subject.
Given his track record either of these are plausible.
a reply to: Antisocialist