It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is really what prophet Muhammad said, “The day of Judgment will not come until all nations will be against Muslims from all sides as lions surround their prey from all sides”
[...]
O Muhammad, you said nothing but the truth when said: “The day of Judgment will not start till all people will surround Muslims as lions surround their prey.”
And he said, “The day of Judgment will not come until you fight the Jews and you will win.”
[...]
Islam is not a new religion. Instead, Islam continues the previous revelations. hence, we believe in Moses, Jesus, Mary, Abraham, etc.
[...]
Muslims loosed that battle with Israel and prophet Muhammad said that but he said that we are going to win against the oppressors and THE LAND WILL RETURN TO ITS OWNERS.
JudahMaccabbi: According to the Kabbalah when the world will decend upon Jerusalem the War of Gog and Magog will occur. This will result in the coming of the Messiah and the destruction of all enemies of Israel.
[...]
Jerusalem is JEWISH.
Different writers have regarded the life of Abraham differently. He has been viewed as a chieftain of the Amorites, as the head of a great Semitic migration from Mesopotamia; or, since Ur and Haran were seats of Moon-worship, he has been identified with a moon-god. From the character of the literary evidence and the locale of the stories it has been held that Abraham was originally associated with Hebron. The double name Abram/Abraham has even suggested that two personages have been combined in the Biblical narrative; although this does not explain the change from Sarai to Sarah. But it is important to remember that the narratives are not contemporary, and that the interesting discovery of the name Abi-ramu (Abram) on Babylonian contracts of about 2000 BC does not prove the Abram of the Old Testament to be an historical person, even as the fact that there were "Amorites" in Babylonia at the same period does not make it certain that the patriarch was one of their number. One remarkable chapter associates Abraham with kings of Elam and the east (Genesis 14). No longer a peaceful sheikh but a warrior with a small army of 318 followers, he overthrows a combination of powerful monarchs who have ravaged the land. The genuineness of the narrative has been strenuously maintained, although upon insufficient grounds.
[...]
Several professors of archeology claim that many stories in the Old Testament, including important chronicles about Abraham, Moses, and others, were actually made up by scribes hired by King Josiah (7th century BC) in order to rationalize monotheistic belief in Yahweh. Evidently, the neighboring countries that kept many written records, such as Egypt, Assyria, etc., have no writings about the stories of the Bible or its main characters before 650 BC. Such claims are detailed in "Who Were the Early Israelites?" by William G. Dever, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI (2003). Another such book by Neil A. Silberman and colleagues is "The Bible Unearthed," Simon and Schuster, New York (2001).
Originally posted by dbates
Originally posted by Islam
... Islam is not a new religion. Instead, Islam continues the previous revelations. hence, we believe in Moses, Jesus, Mary, Abraham, etc.
Ah! I'm glad you see things this way. So you obviously have no issues with the Jews occupying the land of Israel. I mean, that's one of the main themes of the Pentateuch(First 5 books of the Bible). Moses was leading the children of Israel out of Egypt into the promise land. So there's got to be no doubt that this land is truly called Israel, and it belongs to the Jews.
So in my mind, the only way that the Muslims could dispute this claim is if they pick and choose the portions of the Bible that they like. So, dispute the claim that the Jews are rightfully promised the land that they live in now, but first you must deny what Abraham and Moses taught.
Islam, I have enjoyed this thread and it is refeshing to hear a Muslim refer to Osama as 'evil'. We (the USA) certainly did use Osama to fight our old opponent, the USSR. I wonder, however, if Osama just became a religious nutjob or if he is still controlled by the shadow government of the USA. I don't know that the evidence can say either way.
You should be careful with this mindset. Once a religious man feels that his enemies' persecution is PROOF of his religion, that man becomes totally enshrouded in error. We Americans saw this when an American Christian preacher named David Koresh was taken down by the government. You see, when a man places himself in a corner, he must then construct a belief system that makes his little corner a HOLY place, proof of his righteousness. That can only lead to deception of oneself.
So here we seem to have two very determined fellows who both claim to be the correct descendant of Abraham.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that really is the core of the matter: Both Jews and Muslims claim to be the chosen seed from Abraham. As I understand it, Hagar (Abe's maidservant) gave birth to Ishmael. I have read that Muslims believe that it is actually Ishmael whom God instructed Abraham to kill as a proof of faith. As most Christians understand it, it was Isaac who was the sacrificial lamb.
Can you shed some light on this? Do you believe that God asked Abraham to sacrifice Isaac or Ishmael? If so, can you describe how you feel that your answer is worth the price that Earth is paying right now?
Seems to me that if you were to both reject Abraham (maybe burn him in effigy), the two faiths might realize that they both have been absolute tools for the destruction of peace on Earth. You must realize that there can be no peace for Earth so long as you both cling to your Abrahamic totem..
Abraham in Islam is the father of prophets. Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad are among his descendant.
Why do you two fight over the right to be Abraham's favored son? We're not talking about land here, and we're not talking about dead women and children, because both sides seem willing to (A) pay with their dead loved one's lives, and (B) retreat or take land as needed.
If the Quran says that Ishmael was the favored son, but the Hebrews say it was Isaac, don't you see that this will keep the two groups involved in endless conflict? These books (the Quran and the Bible) are the two main "instruction manuals" for finding God and yet they are diametrically opposed to one another, right from the start.
I am sticking with my statement: It is Abraham (or the myth of him) that is to blame for all the deaths you have mentioned. This stupid man could not handle his family and all of your problems are the result.
Does the koran speak of the Role of Melchezidek...or does it merely begin with Ismael and Muhammed? Just curious
I am sorry, but your suggestion is lack of evidence because (again) NO one from both sides regardless terrorists or the right fighters consider Abraham’s sons as a reason for their fights.
i really dhavent hear of Melchezidek!!!
Is he one of Abraham's sons or what exactly?
This is very simple, really: The Jews believe they are the chosen ones. Their whole bloodline goes through Isaac. If the Muslims can remove the Jews (or just humble them massively) then clearly the Isaac bloodline will be proven to have been the non-favored one. Alternately, if the Jews can humble (or remove) the Muslims, then they will prove that the Ishmael bloodline is the flawed bloodline and Isaacs bloodline will be supreme. Do you get it? This issue cannot ever be settled and will always linger for as long as both of these groups continue on Earth. You will never get along until one of you is dead/humbled and whichever one of you is in the lesser position (arabs, right now) will always desire the humiliation/death of the other. It's very Freudian.
Caliphate and the Ottoman Empire
The Muslim Caliphate conquered the land from the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantines) in the seventh century and attracted Arab settlers. The local language, Aramaic, gradually disappeared. Throughout the centuries the size of Jewish population in the land fluctuated. Before the birth of modern Zionism, by the early 19th century, only approximately 10,000 Jews lived in the area that is today's Israel. (Dan Bahat, Twenty Centuries of Jewish Life in the Holy Land, 1976, pp. 61-63)
So the Jews had Jerusalem taken from them in 70AD, and then the Muslims took it from the Romans in 638AD. My question is this: When Muslims took Jerusalem from the Romans, were they obligated to give it back to the Jews? Why had the Jews been promised (and given) the so-called "promised land", by their God, and then the Islamic prophet (seed of Ishmael) is the one who conquers Jerusalem? Isn't that a bit odd? Of all the people who could have taken Jerusalem from Rome, it ends up being the Ishmaelic-savior, Mohammed, (and his people) who ends up owning the promised land.
Don't Muslims believe that the prophet arose to heaven from Jerusalem the promised land? Don't they, therefore, view it as particularly divine that it was their prophet, Mohammed (Ishmael's bloodline) that retook Abraham's so-called "promised land"?
Also, how do you imagine Jews reflect upon this moment in 638 when Islam/Mohammed/Ishmael took the promised land? Naturally a Jew would think to himself, "Arrgh! It was us Jews who the Romans unlawfully kicked out of Jerusalem! We have the rightful claim!" Obviously this is how they thought because they have reclaimed it, and as you mention, they now have nuclear missiles there.
How do you think the next few centuries will play out if both bloodlines continue to fight over this promised-land? Will Abraham's children ever allow the rest of us to have a world of peace?
What happened to tolerance?
THERE IS NO RIGHT RELIGION
Each of us have our own beliefs and NONE of them are perfect.
If they were we'd be kickin' back having a beer with God right now.
I applaud the idea of sharing wealth and ideas with the thought that we can all grow together, learn and accept each other but if you can't play nicely pack up your toys and go home.
To me the concept people have of the Jihad is similar to the Christian fanatical Godbotherers we have in the west too. It is the same in every religion, a few fanatics stretch the entire well meaning concept out of all proportion.
So much for a united world, if we can't collectively act like adults and get along then maybe we should just build a big fence around each country and pretend it's our own little sheltered world.
Originally posted by Islam
It will be more interesting to know that NO Muslim is referring to Osama as a holy guy except the Wahhabies direct who are located mainly in Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
You say.....NO WAY to compare between Christian and Muslim wars.
Compare Muslim wars?
Do you want me to?
We are talking Muslim war ,now are we not?
In the name of ''Allah''
go here.......
imia.cc.duth.gr...
Glory Be to God and His Saints ........Martyrs of the Truth....+
helen....
Islam:
You never really answered my earlier post on this thread which asked you to explain the acceptance of the Wahhabies by the Islamic leaders!
Above you state that the wahabbies are mainly located in Saudi Arabia and Egypt....Why does the governments and reglious leaders in these two countries allow the wahabist to flourish, and also fund the radical wahabist teaching through the madras schools.
Does'nt this indicate that the Islamic leadership and the Government of Saudi Arabia and Egypt are supportive of the most fanatical sect in the Islamic religion...the wahabis!
What say you on this?
Granted every religion has it's fanatics.....here in the U.S the KKK Claims to be a Christian organization....However they are not state sanctioned or funded... to my knowledge!
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions!
Islam.......I pointed out to you previously about what the Muslims did .......being in the name of Muhammed.......
Now True Christianity is to follow Jesus Christ ,His ways and what He taught........He did not tell His followers to go and force and kill those that were to accept the truth.......
If I look at what Muhammed taught(in the Koran)and what he DID ......do you think that I can compare and distinguish between the two ?
from the Qu'ran
(17:33) Nor take life - which Allah has made sacred - except for just cause. And if anyone is slain wrongfully, we have given his heir authority (to demand retaliation or to forgive): but let him not exceed bounds in the matter of taking life, for he is helped (by the Law)
from the Sunnah study Sahih Bukhari
(4:52:257) Narrated 'Abdullah: During some of the Ghazawat of the Prophet a woman was found killed. Allah's Apostle disapproved the killing of women and children.
from the Sunnah study Sahih Bukhari
(4:52:65) A man came to the Prophet and asked, "A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah's Cause?" The Prophet said, "He who fights that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause."
from the Qu'ran
(2:178) O you who believe! the law of equality is prescribed to you in cases of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, the woman for the woman. But if any remission is made by the brother of the slain, then prosecution (for the bloodwit) should be made according to usage, and payment should be made to him in a good manner; this is an alleviation from your Lord and a mercy; so whoever exceeds the limit after this he shall have a painful chastisement.
from Sayyed Qutb's book Milestones
"If we insist on calling Islamic jihad a defensive movement, then we must change the meaning of the word `defense' and mean by it `defense of man' against all those elements which limit his freedom. These elements take the form of beliefs and concepts, as well as of political systems, based on economic, racial, or class distinction."
from the Qu'ran
(2:256) There is no compulsion in religion; truly the right way has become clearly distinct from error; therefore, whoever rejects Satan (and what he calls to) and believes in Allah, he indeed has laid hold on the firmest handhold, which shall not break off, and Allah is Hearing, Knowing.
Originally posted by Islam
Suicide in wars and battles are also PROHIBITTED. The proof is that Prophet Muhammad didn’t mention any quote about that nor his companions did such action.
Originally posted by Islam
Imagin that you are sitting with your wife, children, cousin, uncles, and aunts in a big house, and a group of people came inside. They killed some of your children, they raped some of your women relatives, they arrest some of your beloved ones, and finally they threw you all away with no shelter or a place to save you from cold, hot, rain, snow, etc.
I ask you by God, would you call those people “innocents”??????????????????
Originally posted by Islam
Would you believe those people??? Don’t you wish to take revenge from what savage action they’ve don’t to you and to your innocent family??? What you would feel if some one who is living far away and didn’t test any thing from the bitter life you are living and he says that YOU and your family are the terrorists and those groups are the innocents and the leaders of Peace????
Originally posted by Islam
All Arabs, Muslims, and even Palestinians are from inside against the suicide bombing because it is irregular and inhumanity. BUT what can we do if that is the only thing we can do?????
Originally posted by Islam
- FIRST, Sayyed Qutb is NOT in any way the biggest Muslim leaders! He is among the most extremist Wahhabies on earth. And by the way, his books are prohibited to be published in many Arabic countries like Syria, my country.
Originally posted by Islam
- SECOND, NO Muslim scholar (other than Wahhabies >1% of Muslims) makes the war on USA lawful. The war against USA will be lawful in one way. IF THE GOVERNMENT STOPPED MUSLIMS IN USA FROM PRACTICING THEIR RELIGION, and that didn’t happen and will not happen.
Originally posted by Islam
That for American civilians. BUT American soldiers who are following the insane order of the new pharaoh “Bush” and they are killing and torturing INNOCENTS, Iraqis have to fought them because they are killers obviously.
BUT even though, many Iraqis imams (especially Shiia imams ~7% of Muslims) are not allowing to kill any American soldier unless if s/he harm an Iraqi.
Originally posted by Islam
But I will NOT deny that MOST Muslims and especially Arabs (15% of Muslims) hate America.
Originally posted by Islam
1. USA is occupying Muslims” lands (Afghanistan, Iraq, maybe Syria and Iran in the future)
Originally posted by Islam
2. Uniting with Israel, the biggest enemies of Muslims.
Originally posted by Islam
3. Approve the 200 nuclear bombs that Israel had it since 1980s and fighting without hesitating the fertilizing of Uranium in Iran.
Originally posted by Islam
4. Not listening to the UN commands (like when occupying Iraq) and want every one to listen to UN (like what happened in Syria!)
Originally posted by Islam
5. Bush is putting himself as the leader of the creatures if not the lord of them and addressing our countries with undiplomatic names such as (Arc of evil, etc.)
Originally posted by Islam
6. The lies that was done by Bush’s congress concerning the massive weapons in Iraq.
Originally posted by Islam
7. What has happened in Abughraib and Guantamo jails!
Originally posted by Islam
THAT ALL will FORCE Muslims and especially Arabs to hate USA. But Americans should be thankful to ISLAM that preventing some zeal and eunthiastic youth from doing many 9\11. And in every Friday lecture, we hear the imams (Muslims religious’ leaders) advising Muslims to be wise and to not do idiot things like 9\11.
Originally posted by Islam
Muslims and especially Arabs hate USA as they hated before those who occupied and humiliate them and that is because of the USA government (especially BUSH’s) unwise plans and because of the harms that many Muslims are facing from USA government.
Muslims and Arabs DONOT hate USA because they are Not Muslims.
Originally posted by Islam
My previous points told you exactly what made Arabs hate USA. Palestine was the only reason, but after Bush, there are tens of reasons as I mentioned before.