myocarditis no longer exists on NHS website

a reply to: network dude

i explained that result on the first page, I was only trying to provide facts

if you begin typing in Myocard.... it will auto suggest

please check this post

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: network dude

www.nhs.uk...

Yes, that's very nice. Did you go to the site and type Myocarditis in the search field? If so, did you get that result?

Or are you going to play stupid and post the same reply?

It was a different reply. Calm down, dear.

I searched "heart disease" and soon found that.

The search engine on here is a bit pants, too.

So there you go.

This thread is a bit pants, too.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: network dude

www.nhs.uk...

Yes, that's very nice. Did you go to the site and type Myocarditis in the search field? If so, did you get that result?

Or are you going to play stupid and post the same reply?

It was a different reply. Calm down, dear.

it's cool crappy, I am calm. I just verified the search engine was as advertised, that is all. If you try it and get different results, that would be news worthy, but tears, not so much.

originally posted by: UpThenDown


I am not a doctor so perhaps these articles are unrelated, I wlll let those more qualified than myself decide that

I don't understand the issue here though. You typed in myocardium and it gave you suggest heart disease links, so what is it that people are saying is wrong or bad?

a reply to: UpThenDown

I am going off what was stated in the OP. As that has been verified, at least the part where myocarditis doesn't seem to be a recognized illness to the search engine. I have no idea if it was intentional, or just piss poor site management. Neither is a good look for a government site.

a reply to: network dude

"Crappy"? Oh, (clutches pearls)....

a reply to: network dude
It is a piss poor search engine for a national tax funded service, search "London" and the single result link is "how to find an NHS transgender service" - No other suggestions or results.
I took a screen shot coz I thought it was so shoddy lol, but I don't know how to upload here.

a reply to: anonentity

Nobody knew or spoke about myocarditis before the Vaccine rollout. Myocarditis for many was not a thing and was also very very rare.

They have poisoned us all. (those that took it)

a reply to: BlackProject


That's just false. From Wiki, lots of other sources are available if you bother to look:


"In 2013, about 1.5 million cases of acute myocarditis occurred.[6] While people of all ages are affected, the young are most often affected.[7] It is slightly more common in males than females.[1] Most cases are mild.[2] In 2015 cardiomyopathy, including myocarditis, resulted in 354,000 deaths up from 294,000 in 1990.[8][5] The initial descriptions of the condition are from the mid-1800s.[9]"

a reply to: BlackProject

Did you not do any research before posting that?

A simple Google shows many results for myocarditis going back many years.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Did you not bother to read what I wrote? I mentioned it was very very rare, not "did not exist". The very mention of this condition has been at the forefront of all conversations since the vaccine rollout. The numbers you post are just like any other illness that affects humans globally, it's a low number when you look at birth rates and average life expectancy. However, those numbers have now skyrocketed up since the mRNA death shots.

If you are for a second doubting or portraying that myocarditis has not suddenly become a condition that now affects many millions because of vaccines, then you really have your head in the sand.

a reply to: BlackProject

You quote me as saying you said "it did not exist" which I never said.

But you did say this:

"Nobody knew or spoke about myocarditis before the Vaccine rollout. Myocarditis for many was not a thing and was also very very rare."

So, proven that yes it was spoken about before the vaccine rollout and 1.5 million cases as long ago as 2013 is not
"Very, very rare".

Not sure where your head is?


Try to bother reading what I wrote, please?

a reply to: BlackProject

Here.

Please feel free to quote this Govt Source, which clearly exists, out of context:


www.gov.uk... healthcare-professionals-on-myocarditis-and-pericarditis-following-covid-19-vaccination#is-there-an-association-of-myocarditis-or-pericarditis-followi ng-covid-19-vaccination

All the recent advances in medical science and yet:
- We can't define what a woman is.
- We have absolutely no idea why healthy people are dropping dead. Can't figure it out. Impossible to say.

a reply to: jjkenobi

Yeah, but no?

Go to way back machine to look at the archived pages. I put in www.nhs.uk... as that is the logical URL considering what the other pages on there are. It has never tried to archive that page apart from 3 times on 28th August 2022, in which it said page not found. Not sure why it tried to archive it that day, but if the page had been around previously then there would be a snapshot on that site

a reply to: jjkenobi

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So for every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction. An active philosopher would have decided to duck by now. before the reaction begins to get out of hand.

a reply to: anonentity

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

The reason being an incomplete understanding of a topic aka "a little knowledge" tends to breed erroneous supposition as opposed to comprehension of the full picture.

a reply to: andy06shake

indeed we agree yet again.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: anonentity

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

The reason being an incomplete understanding of a topic aka "a little knowledge" tends to breed erroneous supposition as opposed to comprehension of the full picture.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: andy06shake

indeed we agree yet again.

If that were true Anonentity, you wouldn't be posting fear-mongering bitchute opinion piece videos, you'd be posting actual provable data!!