myocarditis no longer exists on NHS website

This seems interesting and relevant, it appears that if you want to search the British NHS for the affliction of Myocarditis. Which is inflammation of the myocardium. In the heart. It apparently no longer exists. Perhaps they don't want people to start putting two and two together, so have decided to wipe the problem from its data bank. www.bitchute.com... Which seems strange as people must just be dying of unknown causes instead.

a reply to: anonentity

I have a close friend who’s 34 and fit as a fiddle.
After feeling unwell a short while after the vax , he went to a NHS hospital and was diagnosed with myocarditis.

This is relevant if they have taken the info down 🫤

Nothing comes up in the nhs search but there;s plenty of information about it on the various nhs websites that can be found via google.

originally posted by: anonentity
This seems interesting and relevant, it appears that if you want to search the British NHS for the affliction of Myocarditis. Which is inflammation of the myocardium. In the heart. It apparently no longer exists. Perhaps they don't want people to start putting two and two together, so have decided to wipe the problem from its data bank. www.bitchute.com... Which seems strange as people must just be dying of unknown causes instead.

a reply to: anonentity

people must just be dying of unknown causes instead.

Overdoing bicycle maintenance.

Cyclist Rab Wardell dies two days after winning Scottish title.

Mountain biker Rab Wardell has died in his sleep aged 37 - just two days after winning the Scottish championship.

The rider appeared on BBC Scotland's The Nine programme on Monday evening, describing how he had overcome three punctures to win the race.

3 punctures is gonna do it, every .... single ..... time.

It's listed as cardiomyopathy on the main NHS website

www.nhs.uk...

Whether or not it always has, I couldn't say


Edit: actually no, myocarditis is inflammatory cardiomyopathy, which isn't specifically mentioned there .... No idea why. Maybe because it's not very common? But it's hardly hiding things given the hundreds of other websites about it.

a reply to: anonentity

"There is no evidence that a page solely dedicated to myocarditis has ever existed on Britain’s NHS website, despite claims on social media that it has been removed."

www.reuters.com...

a reply to: anonentity

when I initially search for myocarditis on a search engine I am given this term and information

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium). The inflammation can reduce the heart's ability to pump blood. Myocarditis can cause chest pain, shortness of breath, and rapid or irregular heart rhythms (arrhythmias). Infection with a virus is one cause of myocarditis

if I then search the NHS website for myocardium, i get the following results (click the link)

while typing in myocardium to the search on the NHS website a suggested search for the following appears

myocardial infarction


I am not a doctor so perhaps these articles are unrelated, I wlll let those more qualified than myself decide that

a reply to: anonentity
Or simply they are using a different name.
Try looking up "cardiomythapy, which covers heart muscle problems in general.
www.nhs.uk...

a reply to: anonentity

May I ask, when you did your due diligence on this video (i assume prior to posting on ATS) what results did you get?

a reply to: DISRAELI

Apparently, details regarding myocarditis can be found elsewhere on the NHS website.

So pretty much just fake news and fear-mongering.

a reply to: anonentity

If there was some giant conspriacy trying to hide data, don't you think the gov.uk page would have also been taken down!!

.Gov.uk

There's more scarmongering and doom porn on ATS then on MSM now.

a reply to: andy06shake
Another video as 'evidence' lol, I should start videos of people ranting at my local pub, get both arguments for and against, even a decent fist fight if it's controversial enough...but at least it's a bit more #ing real!🤣

a reply to: angeltone

LoL

Pub rants would make a great forum here angeltone just for the banter and crack alone.

The only thing is the site TnC is apt to make anything resembling such somewhat of an untenable prospect.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
3 punctures is gonna do it, every .... single ..... time.

What they didn't mention was they were punctures in his abdominal cavity

a reply to: andy06shake
Pmsl, at least you can call bull# out in the pub as each claim is made!
It's why I love ATS for sifting through the rambling speeches, finding the specific claim, condensing it to one or two lines, then we can disregard or not.

Modern day ATS threads are rarely better than the days before video streaming.
Often worse, coz 5-10 minutes of watching/listening to a rant, which could be shortened to just a couple of factual sentences!🤣

It's interesting to see the conclusions being jumped to here. The OP simply posted a video that points out a fact. The fact in and of itself is what some might consider "interesting" as it's factual. But to see others who have a habit of being FOR main stream ideas related to Covid try to defend this is odd. It's just one thing removed from the site. it's not like they changed the definition of vaccination or something.

a reply to: myselfaswell

As cyclist here in Japan that did a Japan tour from April to August l am very sadden by this news.

a reply to: network dude

The OP simply posted a video that points out a fact. The fact in and of itself is what some might consider "interesting" as it's factual.

But is it factual? Was there originally a link specifically to Myocarditis and not just general heart health? It is just a bitchute vid of someone typing Myocarditis into google. There wasn't a shot of some previous page was there??

a reply to: anonentity

I did a little Wayback searching and am not finding anything. So either it was never captured, or it never existed in the first place.

This could also be said from the other perspective though.

I'd say the only reason anyone is finding it "interesting" is that it is in their imagination another smoking gun.......

originally posted by: network dude
It's interesting to see the conclusions being jumped to here. The OP simply posted a video that points out a fact. The fact in and of itself is what some might consider "interesting" as it's factual. But to see others who have a habit of being FOR main stream ideas related to Covid try to defend this is odd. It's just one thing removed from the site. it's not like they changed the definition of vaccination or something.