myocarditis no longer exists on NHS website

a reply to: myselfaswell

Only three? I thought they were up to 4 punctures now.

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: network dude

The OP simply posted a video that points out a fact. The fact in and of itself is what some might consider "interesting" as it's factual.

But is it factual? Was there originally a link specifically to Myocarditis and not just general heart health? It is just a bitchute vid of someone typing Myocarditis into google. There wasn't a shot of some previous page was there??

I'm not sure how to look back, but it's not there now. You can try it.
but there is this:
www.mayoclinic.org...
So it exists, it's real. But the opposition to this just seems over the top. Like folks are scared their narrative might be bruised. But the initial OP makes the claim, and it's a difficult one to prove, but the disease is real, and not some fringe topic, so for it not to be there, seems odd.

www.hra.nhs.uk...

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2


www.hra.nhs.uk...[/quo te]




did you find that with the search option? I only ask, as I tried it, and didn't get a hit.

edit on 5-9-2022 by network dude because: Beto, what a stupid name

a reply to: network dude

I just googled "myocarditis".

a reply to: network dude

The link you posted is from the Mayo Clinic and has nothing to do with the NHS. The N.H.S. (National Health Service) is as British as it gets.

It's a Government-funded medical and health care services that everyone living in the UK can use and is free at the point of use and is funded by taxes.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: network dude

I just googled "myocarditis".

You're making it to easy for these doom sayers to say we're all the same poster or shill or bots!!

For me its nothing to do with a bruised ego and everything to do with yet another straw clutching badly researched post based on nothing but a random video.

Give me something with an ounce of credibility and I'll take it seriously, anything else is facepalm city for me dude.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: network dude

The OP simply posted a video that points out a fact. The fact in and of itself is what some might consider "interesting" as it's factual.

But is it factual? Was there originally a link specifically to Myocarditis and not just general heart health? It is just a bitchute vid of someone typing Myocarditis into google. There wasn't a shot of some previous page was there??

I'm not sure how to look back, but it's not there now. You can try it.
but there is this:
www.mayoclinic.org...
So it exists, it's real. But the opposition to this just seems over the top. Like folks are scared their narrative might be bruised. But the initial OP makes the claim, and it's a difficult one to prove, but the disease is real, and not some fringe topic, so for it not to be there, seems odd.

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: network dude

The link you posted is from the Mayo Clinic and has nothing to do with the NHS. The N.H.S. (National Health Service) is as British as it gets.

It's a Government-funded medical and health care services that everyone living in the UK can use and is free at the point of use and is funded by taxes.

that was merely to show it's a real thing. Not that it has anything to do with the NHS. But I did go to the NHS and type Myocarditis in their search engine.

I got:

Search results for myocarditis
Enter a search term
myocarditis
Submit
No results found for myocarditis

So is it not a real thing in the UK?

originally posted by: nonspecific

For me its nothing to do with a bruised ego and everything to do with yet another straw clutching badly researched post based on nothing but a random video.

Give me something with an ounce of credibility and I'll take it seriously, anything else is facepalm city for me dude.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: network dude

The OP simply posted a video that points out a fact. The fact in and of itself is what some might consider "interesting" as it's factual.

But is it factual? Was there originally a link specifically to Myocarditis and not just general heart health? It is just a bitchute vid of someone typing Myocarditis into google. There wasn't a shot of some previous page was there??

I'm not sure how to look back, but it's not there now. You can try it.
but there is this:
www.mayoclinic.org...
So it exists, it's real. But the opposition to this just seems over the top. Like folks are scared their narrative might be bruised. But the initial OP makes the claim, and it's a difficult one to prove, but the disease is real, and not some fringe topic, so for it not to be there, seems odd.

so the site in question returning a :

Search results for myocarditis
Enter a search term
myocarditis
Submit
No results found for myocarditis

has nothing to do with the OP? I'm not in the UK, don't plan to go, and have no dog in this hunt, I just find it odd how strong the pushback is on something that's halfway verifiable. If you think it's nothing to see that the NHS in your country doesn't recognize Myocarditis, then super. I'm not here to fight. *on this topic*.

a reply to: network dude

www.nhs.uk...

The elephant in the room is still being ignored while people quibble over details.

The vaccines are years away from the usual testing and data collecting that has always been require in the past, so why are they not keeping records on the vaccination status of the deceased?

Early in the pandemic, people who died of gunshot wounds were listed as covid deaths. People who died 'with' covid were being listed as having died 'from' covid. Those are the facts, so choosing to believe any information or statistics at this point must contain a high degree of close-minded bias.

I trust information coming from a conspiracy site more than that coming from known professional liars that stand to make a fortune from convincing the masses to believe in them.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Glad you posted that link lol, it just reinforced my view that the nhs.uk search engine is crap unless you got the exact terms.
...I searched "Plymouth" and got "no results found" no suggestions either, so yep, the public web search options on the main NHS site are crap... that's the real story here!🤣

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: network dude

www.nhs.uk...

Yes, that's very nice. Did you go to the site and type Myocarditis in the search field? If so, did you get that result?

Or are you going to play stupid and post the same reply?

originally posted by: drewlander

Only three? I thought they were up to 4 punctures now.

They are free so you can get 20, never too safe...

originally posted by: Kurokage
It is just a bitchute vid

It always is.

Definitely not on the NHS search page. I find this strange. Type any other medical condition and something pops up.

There's plenty to see but for whatever reason just doesn't show up in the search results under the actual word on the NHS website.

A google search for the term and NHS brings up plenty of results from loads of various NHS pages so it's clearly not been eliminated.

It could be something iffy but if so they have not done a very good job at it if they left the actual pages available.

The NHS website is not something I've ever actually used before if I'm honest, we usually just speak to our GP directly with any concerns.

A direct phonecall or in person discussion costs us nothing as it's all paid for in full via NI payments remember

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: nonspecific

For me its nothing to do with a bruised ego and everything to do with yet another straw clutching badly researched post based on nothing but a random video.

Give me something with an ounce of credibility and I'll take it seriously, anything else is facepalm city for me dude.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: network dude

The OP simply posted a video that points out a fact. The fact in and of itself is what some might consider "interesting" as it's factual.

But is it factual? Was there originally a link specifically to Myocarditis and not just general heart health? It is just a bitchute vid of someone typing Myocarditis into google. There wasn't a shot of some previous page was there??

I'm not sure how to look back, but it's not there now. You can try it.
but there is this:
www.mayoclinic.org...
So it exists, it's real. But the opposition to this just seems over the top. Like folks are scared their narrative might be bruised. But the initial OP makes the claim, and it's a difficult one to prove, but the disease is real, and not some fringe topic, so for it not to be there, seems odd.

so the site in question returning a :

Search results for myocarditis
Enter a search term
myocarditis
Submit
No results found for myocarditis

has nothing to do with the OP? I'm not in the UK, don't plan to go, and have no dog in this hunt, I just find it odd how strong the pushback is on something that's halfway verifiable. If you think it's nothing to see that the NHS in your country doesn't recognize Myocarditis, then super. I'm not here to fight. *on this topic*.

originally posted by: network dude

Yes, that's very nice. Did you go to the site and type Myocarditis in the search field? If so, did you get that result?

Or are you going to play stupid and post the same reply?

So that site seems to be just for basic questions that the general public can go to, not a data base or deep diving any one thing at a much higher level then just basic questions and answers.

So I went to the site and typed in "myocardial covid vaccine" and the first link on the new page was "Health conditions and coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination" that I clicked, and it gave me a very long list below



I then clicked "Heart Disease" and it took me to this page with all kinds of information on it all, so I'm not understanding the OP's point here. Myocardial

Given the long history of paying vast sums to private companies via outsourcing in the NHS I'm inclined to believe this is more likely a case of having a crap website and search engine than anything sinister.



a reply to: Xtrozero