It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: yuppa
Weird how they werent traitors before the 2014 US coup, no? Regardless, im talking about civilian deaths.
Ukraine nor Russia is involved with the ICC.
It was genocide, which is not an excuse nor justification but it is a perspective
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: JinMI
Which proceded a US backed coup.
I can see why the Ukrainian people would want to get rid of their Moscow puppet President and gain some of the freedoms of the West , if there was a coup it was the people against the government that didn't represent the will of the people and the people won , Huzzah ! , sadly Mother Russia doesn't let go that easily.
originally posted by: choomsuba
The USA placed all Japanese Americans in internment camps during WWII, which was ok, right?
Zelensky is probably working toward this with any Ukrainian citizens of Russian descent.
This is acceptable for the sake of supporting the war effort.
originally posted by: MisguidedAngel
The Ukrainian government had already called all the Ukranians of Russian descent Terrorists back in 2014.
originally posted by: Cutepants
Are you guys being serious? It's a war. They literally kill people, but shutting down a party and taking their money is unacceptable? You can't tolerate foreign agents working to undermine the war effort when real lives are on the line.
If he continues to ban parties for ideological reasons after the war, then I'll change my mind. But a pro-Russia party in that situation should absolutely be banned.
originally posted by: Cutepants
a reply to: MisguidedAngel
None of that happened in Ukraine, for God's sake. They didn't ban Russians from politics. Are you aware that Zelensky himself is Russian, he grew up speaking Russian at home? So are you really so ignorant about what is going on there, or are you trolling me? Banning a party doesn't equal banning an ethnicity.
originally posted by: Cutepants
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe
Did I say he wasn't?
originally posted by: SleeperHasAwakened
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee
Holy crap, Annee.
We invaded Iraq unjustly in 2003. Lied about it.
We invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and stayed there for 20 years only to leave our enemies better armed and in the loving arms of communist China.
We turned Libya into a massive slave market.
We've been helping the House of Saud murder civilians in Yemen for the last 10 years.
You are unbelievably daft.
Which has nothing to do with Russia invading a sovereign neighbor.
1. RELIGION: late 2001, the United States and its close allies invaded Afghanistan and toppled the Taliban government.
2. RELIGION: During the 1970s and ’80s, Qaddafi’s government financed a wide variety of Muslim and anti-imperial groups worldwide, from Palestinian guerrillas and Philippine Muslim rebels to the Irish Republican Army.
3. RELIGION: United States invasion of Afghanistan In late 2001, the United States and its close allies invaded Afghanistan
and toppled the Taliban government.
Seek and you shall find the answers you choose to project.
I was under the impression we invaded Afghanistan to neutralize the Taliban, in response to terrorists attack on U.S. soil that killed > 3k people.
Their religion is their problem, until they use it to justify violence against us. We seem to have sorted out religion here, and figured out how to make it cooexist with government, so saying "RELIGION" caused the Afghanistan conflict, that is a bit of an oversimplification. ONE religion fomented terror attacks, and we responded to those attacks by invading Afghanistan, which had nothing to do with OUR religious context in the U.S.
We shouldn't forget that we also helped create Al-Qaeda and the Taliban by meddling in Afghanistan, and that had nothing to do with religion (it was to "counter communism").
I don't really get where you're going with Libya. Generally Qaddafi was considered more secular than counterparts in the region. He certainly was a bad actor in the 80's, but had really gone away from major support of terror groups in later years. The past history of Libya backing terror groups is not really relevant to the "Arab Spring" debacle that the U.S, foreign policy makers completely botched by using that as a pretext for regime change in Libya. Now Libya is worse off than before, and we all know whose fault that is.
Oh STOP IT
Russia had no plan of taking over all of Ukraine.....
So if US and Mexico happened to get into a war, should all Latinos be banned from US politics? Because you know they might be foreign agents, even though they were born in the US
If Canada and France got in a war should all French Canadian government parties be banned? Because you know they are ethnic French people and they just might be foreign agents even though they, their parents and grandparents were all born in Canada, they still might have a soft spot for France.