ADHD meds for VAIDS

originally posted by: jos23
a reply to: andy06shake

Here are some studies that seem to show the natural immune system is damaged by the shots.

igorchudov.substack.com...

Blog entries don't count as studies, and the rest don't say what you think that they say.

a reply to: jos23

Still don't explain who Igor is nor what his credentials are.

Nor does it make the blog you linked to an actual study or report.

And im still waiting to hear how this "Goddess Kali" give you this alleged information?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

The authors write:

"Additional booster doses may be able to compensate for relatively decreased binding to new viral variant antigens, potentially decreasing the public health impact of antibody response imprinting."

But more shots seem to make it worse.

a reply to: andy06shake

I asked for a source, but none was forthcoming. I'm not certain if this is a screen name for some blogger where they read the information or a supernatural source that they channeled.

Either way, it doesn't agree with Alistair Crowley's predictions so we can probably discount it out of hand.

Another study.

igorchudov.substack.com...


"The question that they asked, was: do the vaccinated acquire the same full-spectrum immunity as the unvaccinated?

The answer was no. Vaccinated people were much LESS likely to develop broad natural immunity, compared to unvaccinated people.


It gets even worse: for those vaccinated persons whose breakthrough infection occurred after the second dose, (illness detected on Day 29), their ability to develop N antibodies was 13 TIMES worse than that of the unvaccinated:"

originally posted by: jos23
a reply to: AaarghZombies

The authors write:

"Additional booster doses may be able to compensate for relatively decreased binding to new viral variant antigens, potentially decreasing the public health impact of antibody response imprinting."

But more shots seem to make it worse.

That doesn't mean what you think that it means. It really just means that somebody who is vaxxed could "potentially" have a stronger immune response to some Covid variants than others.

In contrast somebody with natural immunity after being exposed to covid itself could "potentially" a broader level of immune response against varients because their body isn't just looking for the spike protean.

Nowhere does it imply that the immune response is reduced or damaged in some way. There is no immune deficiency.

This only actually applies to the mRNA shot, not the killed virus version, which does itself seem to be less efficient based on Chinese and Russian numbers.

a reply to: jos23

Mate thats a blog for about the 4th time now. LoL

Do you have any sort of peer-reviewed information to support your claims that does not come from the mind of who ever the feck Igor is?

originally posted by: jos23
Another study.

igorchudov.substack.com...


"The question that they asked, was: do the vaccinated acquire the same full-spectrum immunity as the unvaccinated?

The answer was no. Vaccinated people were much LESS likely to develop broad natural immunity, compared to unvaccinated people.


It gets even worse: for those vaccinated persons whose breakthrough infection occurred after the second dose, (illness detected on Day 29), their ability to develop N antibodies was 13 TIMES worse than that of the unvaccinated:"

This doesn't mean what you think that it means. There is no immune deficiency, induced or otherwise.

It simply means that somebody who catches a variant could potentially have more protection against similar variants in future, but it's completely dependant on that person actually catching covid in the first place. As they have no initial immunity.

People who have breakthrough infections often have increased co-morbidity, so of course it would be worse. They're already behind the curve to begin with.

Its like saying that if you find someone whose taken a basketball to the face, and you punch them, they're more likely to get a concussion than someone who didn't take a basketball to the face.

a reply to: jos23

The doomsday profit? LoL

Still not told us all how Kali contacts you, does she have a blog?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: jos23

Mate thats a blog for about the 4th time now. LoL

Do you have any sort of peer-reviewed information to support your claims that does not come from the mind of who ever the feck Igor is?

He's a Russian with a loooong history of mischief making going back to the 1990s, he used to like setting up message boards under false pretenses and then subverting them.

Link

AGAIN he links to the studies. It may help people to read what they possibly mean first.

a reply to: jos23

I have always been concerned with the umpteen billions currently dying of 'Bluetooth acquired immune deficiency syndrome' (BAIDS) - a function of the now infamous 5G cranial explosion research done at CERN. Numbers clearly revealed in the 'Bluetooth adverse reaction something' (BAERS) database.

Clearly we must all immediately microwave our mobile 'phones to save the human race. Of course, this may always result in the 'hot handheld burns syndrome' (HHBS) in some, but that is a risk that we may have to accept for true peace of mindlessness.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: jos23
Another study.

igorchudov.substack.com...


"The question that they asked, was: do the vaccinated acquire the same full-spectrum immunity as the unvaccinated?

The answer was no. Vaccinated people were much LESS likely to develop broad natural immunity, compared to unvaccinated people.


It gets even worse: for those vaccinated persons whose breakthrough infection occurred after the second dose, (illness detected on Day 29), their ability to develop N antibodies was 13 TIMES worse than that of the unvaccinated:"

This doesn't mean what you think that it means. There is no immune deficiency, induced or otherwise.

It simply means that somebody who catches a variant could potentially have more protection against similar variants in future, but it's completely dependant on that person actually catching covid in the first place. As they have no initial immunity.

People who have breakthrough infections often have increased co-morbidity, so of course it would be worse. They're already behind the curve to begin with.

Its like saying that if you find someone whose taken a basketball to the face, and you punch them, they're more likely to get a concussion than someone who didn't take a basketball to the face.

Can´t say. I know VAIDS is real but no expert on understanding studies. Guess it is easier to follow data comparing vaxxed and non vaxxed.

a reply to: jos23

So why are you posting links to a blog and not the actual studies?

Are these alleged ""studies"" peer-reviewed or simply the ramblings of antivax lunatics afraid of a little prick in the arm?

The real question i really wish to know all the same is how Kali contacts you or provided you this information?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: jos23

So why are you posting links to a blog and not the actual studies?

Are these alleged ""studies"" peer-reviewed or simply the ramblings of antivax lunatics afraid of a little prick in the arm?

The real question i really wish to know all the same is how Kali contacts you or provided you this information?

So people can read what they may mean. And since Vanden Bossche linked to that blog.
The rest may not be so interesting for this thread.

How can this be good?


"Additional booster doses may be able to compensate for relatively decreased binding to new viral variant antigens, potentially decreasing the public health impact of antibody response imprinting."

a reply to: jos23

That hardly answers why you cannot simply post links to the actual studies as opposed to the ramblings of anti-vaxxers or their blogs.

Still not answering how Kali contacts you with this information nether, why is that?

originally posted by: jos23
How can this be good?


"Additional booster doses may be able to compensate for relatively decreased binding to new viral variant antigens, potentially decreasing the public health impact of antibody response imprinting."

If i understand Vanden Bossche he mean those useless antibodies can also be used by a new more dangerous variant to reach the lungs.

Need to watch his videos to understand it better though.

Bossche says government should implement large antiviral drug campaigns for the vaxxed.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: jos23

That hardly answers why you cannot simply post links to the actual studies as opposed to the ramblings of anti-vaxxers or their blogs.

Still not answering how Kali contacts you with this information nether, why is that?

But don´t you agree with Bossche that it is crazy to mass vaccinate with a leaky vaxx duing a pandemic?

You risk giving resistant and even more dangerous variants an advantage over others don´t you think?

Perhaps i can start another thread about Kali. Will ask first.

a reply to: jos23

Put simply, no.

Why, you ask?

Because there is no evidence that the vax is "leaky", this also doesn't mean what you think that it means.

That was an early conspiracy that claimed that people who were vaxxed with the mRNA vax were turned into proteins factories, and that you could get vaxxed simply by sitting next to a vaxxed person and breathing in proteins that they breathed out.