Biden: There’s ‘No Rational Basis’ For Citizens To have 9mm Pistols

There is no rational basis for Biden to stay as the president of the usa.

We all know where this is going, the rice shooter used in my younger days at school will be the 'assualt weapons' of the future. We are not allowed to own anything that will interfere with their plans.

The USA citizens should keep their guns, ammo and whatever. It's pretty clear those are needed to balance things out.

What an embarrassment this guy is. Not even going into the stupidity he and his handlers display regarding ammunition caliber.

If you had problems with Trump and his mouth "shooting from the hip", then Biden has done nothing but double down on that behavior. And the worst part it, clearly this rubbish is not even originating with Biden! With Trump, he might've said some truly goofy things, but I believe they were his words and his anecdotes. This is regurgitated second-hand crap, like the "Nukes and F-15s" meme, and it's demonstrating a clear lack of understanding on the basic principles of something these people are trying to form legislation on.

So now we (or some of us at least) have a "more presidential" POTUS, which essentially means the stupid crap is said, just now, it's the other party saying it.

Well, ok, so he's clearly not playing with a full deck that was already missing a few cards to begin with...but at least he's done a good job with the economy. And the supply chain issues. And foreign policy.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Couple things: to see a flash of chrome...the round has already gone thru you....then the FIRE from exploding round will flash the assailant in the face. 357-5...five....rounds.

My 45 dbl stack..10+2....will stop bout anybody w a very very large exit hole.

Just a pref....but I'll take my 357, 5 round 1500-1700 fps flame thrower for in my face defense.

Got all kinds of pistols/revolvers....but at my age....I keep it simple, concealed, compact....

All around, I think 9's are great. But this isnt about that....

originally posted by: infolurker
So, You thought it was the evil so called "black rifles" that the Democrats were coming after. How many times have we heard from the left that they don't want to outlaw firearms, just those evil "black rifles".

Nah, I didn't think that. Going back at least to after Newtown, whenever they talk about an "Assault weapons ban" (AWB for short), if you read their proposals it always includes anything with a detachable magazine, regardless of caliber. That means millions of semi-auto handguns of all calibers would be banned.

Reminder, about 40 percent of Democrats admitted they want to outright repeal the 2nd Amendment. They can no longer lie and say they're not coming for your guns.

originally posted by: XipeTotex

Everything of course really depends on the situation, like how natives have shot hundreds of adult polar bears, you see them swimming, drive a boat right behind it, place a button right behind the ear with a 22. Easy as pie.

Are we hunting a bear from a boat, or we talking defense from a charging bear? When in AK fishing do you carry only a .22 on your hip?

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: Xtrozero

Couple things: to see a flash of chrome...the round has already gone thru you....then the FIRE from exploding round will flash the assailant in the face. 357-5...five....rounds.

My 45 dbl stack..10+2....will stop bout anybody w a very very large exit hole.

Just a pref....but I'll take my 357, 5 round 1500-1700 fps flame thrower for in my face defense.

Got all kinds of pistols/revolvers....but at my age....I keep it simple, concealed, compact....

All around, I think 9's are great. But this isnt about that....

I guess my point is when they limit the mag people just go bigger...

a reply to: Xtrozero

I dont need anything, just talk them away, if that does not work i yell at them, but i have once spoken to an old hunter who shot his first bear with a 22.

If one charged at me a would just die, would be a glorious death.

originally posted by: XipeTotex

I dont need anything, just talk them away, if that does not work i yell at them, but i have once spoken to an old hunter who shot his first bear with a 22.

If one charged at me a would just die, would be a glorious death.

Have fun with that...

a reply to: Xtrozero

Thanks, i pay attention to my surroundings, if one finds oneself in a situation where an attack is likely, you have already messed up. you know, spilled milk and all.

originally posted by: XipeTotex

Thanks, i pay attention to my surroundings, if one finds oneself in a situation where an attack is likely, you have already messed up. you know, spilled milk and all.

In any case if I have a bear charging I would rather have a .44 mag

a reply to: Xtrozero

Then you absolutely have a better chance of survival, later just die of neglect in an old people home.

originally posted by: XipeTotex

Then you absolutely have a better chance of survival, later just die of neglect in an old people home.

I'm 62 now and I'm hoping by the time I'm in an old folks home VR is so good I just tap in and I'm in another world. It would sure beat watching reruns from the 70s...

Another part to all this that Joe just can not understand as we saw with his "ladies, you only need a 12 gauge" words of wisdom is most women can not handle guns larger than 9mm very well. I ended up buying a Glock 19x for my wife as it was so much easier for her to shoot well compared to even a .40.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Same CC weapon

We can joke about this all we want but realize....


The leaders of Canada and the US are talking about how handguns are not necessary. This is some very,very scary stuff. No longer is this fringe thinking. No longer is this conspiracy.

They are coming for our guns folks.

www.breitbart.com...


The Raise the Age Act (H.R. 3015, Rep. Anthony Brown of Maryland)
Prevent Gun Trafficking Act (H.R. 2280, Rep. Robin Kelly of Illinois)
The Untraceable Firearms Act (H.R. 3088, Rep. David Cicilline of Rhode Island)
Ethan’s Law (H.R. 748, Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut)
The Safe Guns, Safe Kids Act (H.R. 6370, Rep. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan)
The Kimberly Vaughan Firearm Safe Storage Act (H.R. 130, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas)
Closing the Bump Stock Loophole Act (H.R. 5427, Rep. Dina Titus of Nevada)
The Keep Americans Safe Act (H.R. 2510, Rep. Ted Deutch of Florida)

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: infolurker

I'm pretty sure the rational basis for any weapon is to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government.

Canada is doing it right

originally posted by: rickymouse
Yeah, when you are out picking blueberries and a bear comes around...pull out that twenty two pistol to piss off the bear with. I got a three fifty seven to take out picking berries, at least you can slow him down when it chases you with nine shots from that. But again, the Democrats do not want you out picking berries, they want you dependent on them to survive.

I don't know what you are getting at here...
The .22 is NOT for shooting bears.
It is for shooting whoever is with you, in the foot, to slow them down as you are running from said bear.

a reply to: Xtrozero

We had a woman in Detroit kill her roommate....with a crock pot.

Violence is the problem....not what's used to perpetrate it.

For some reason Joe Biden is extremely paranoid of getting shot.

He told the border patrol agents who met with him in uvalde Texas this past weekend, to leave their guns outside the building.

originally posted by: Gothmog

Biden: There’s ‘No Rational Basis’ For Citizens To have 9mm Pistols

Joe , Thomas Jefferson made it perfectly clear as to the reason for the 2nd Amendment .
And there was no caliber restrictions involved .

According to the anti-constitutional lunatics, we'll be running around throwing nukes at each other if a handle isn't put on guns ASAP.