Klaus Schwab's Father Was A Nazi And Close Confidant Of Hitler

a reply to: daskakik

Of course I absolutely NOT wrote it in jest. Come on.

then you went on about Brennstoffbehaelter being gas can and not flamethrower, what does that have to do with the topic of the thread?

Yeah, because when someone posts information that is #, I call it out. So when the one isn't even able to verify their own sources for validity but just buy into it and repost...

Count on me pointing such huge flaws out. When the source isn't even getting translations right that can be verified by google translator even, I don't trust the member presenting it and will call that out.

Because I can, because I am German and have the background info. Do you have a problem with that?

originally posted by: TDDAgain
Because I can, because I am German and have the background info. Do you have a problem with that?

Yes I have a problem because I don't get your point.

An ATS member posted what americans have on record as being one of the products produced by the company Karl Schwab's father worked for. They seem to have made a mistake in translation but it is so insignificant, in regards to the topic of the thread, that I don't understand why you are being so hostile.

a reply to: daskakik

The difference between a gas can and a flamethrower is significant. One is a innocent storage container, the other one a deadly gruesome weapon.

It's not hostility, I am clear and direct. I see what is being done and call it out. When someone uses a trash source to prove a point, it should be allowed to be called out, especially from that member who has a history doing such things.


And by all means, if you have a problem with this, go annoy the mods and let them figure it out.

originally posted by: TDDAgain
The difference between a gas can and a flamethrower is significant. One is a innocent storage container, the other one a deadly gruesome weapon.

Not in the point that member was trying to make.

The German part of the company, that Eugen Schwab directed, did not produce the flame-thowers.

And here you are agreeing that not only were they not produced by the company under Eugen Schwab but they were not even flamethrowers but fuel cans.

WTF are you up in arms about?

originally posted by: daskakik

The German part of the company, that Eugen Schwab directed, did not produce the flame-thowers.

And here you are agreeing that not only were they not produced by the company under Eugen Schwab but they were not even flamethrowers but fuel cans.

WTF are you up in arms about?

"Here"? Where? That quote isn't from me!

Unbelievable that it escapes you, that even while it helps your side of the argument a tiny bit, it NULLIFIES the source's validity. Do you trust a source that can't even get basic translations right?

Evidently, yes.

Unbelieveable that it escapes you that my two sources contain two tow ropes or "rabbit holes" that you could easy follow but you can't even spot them. That tells # loads about you and chronauts qualifications to speak and research about the topic.

Again, I would post more sources but you two can't even use the first ones I provided, so why should I take the time? I rather type this reply to you, because why should I backup my claims more, when you can't even grasp the sources I provided?

originally posted by: TDDAgain
"Here"? Where? That quote isn't from me!

No, it is what chr0naut posted. That is why it says "the point that member was trying to make" right above it.

Unbelievable that it escapes you, that even while it helps your side of the argument a tiny bit, it NULLIFIES the source's validity. Do you trust a source that can't even get basic translations right?

I can take it with a pinch of salt since it doesn't swing the argument in the other direction.

Unbelieveable that it escapes you that my two sources contain two tow ropes or "rabbit holes" that you could easy follow but you can't even spot them. That tells # loads about you and chronauts qualifications to speak and research about the topic.

Again, I would post more sources but you two can't even use the first ones I provided, so why should I take the time? I rather type this reply to you, because why should I backup my claims more, when you can't even grasp the sources I provided?

I can't even tell what your claim is, since it pretty much is the same as chr0naut's, Karl's dad never made flamethrowers.

Besides, I believe the son isn't responsible for the sins of the father and it doesn't mean he is like him, which is the strawman this thread is based on.

a reply to: daskakik

I can't even tell what your claim is, since it pretty much is the same as chr0naut's, Karl's dad never made flamethrowers.

Again, quote me on that because it's not true. You are confused.

It's about slave workers used at those factories, not flamethrowers. You just got yourself distracted by that, but now I know where you confusion sits.

Go to the two links I provided, read them. Comprehend them. Show me you actually care about the topic and grasp it by making a statement about those two articles.

Then come back to me and ask me about the family tree if you have problems finding that out. I won't waste time on this, you see, but I can reach a helping hand if you show that you actually grasp the whole topic.

Start at the beginning of the thread and the other threads about that topic, maybe. Then come back, show to me you actually care and then I might consider investing time.

But as it stands, it's doable on your own, that is, if you want to.

originally posted by: TDDAgain
Again, quote me on that because it's not true. You are confused.

No, you are confused:

Too bad that "Brennstoffbehaelter" means "gasoline can" and isn't a flame thrower.

BernnieJGato said

schwabs father was the director of a company that produced turbines, flamethrowers and did research for the Nazi's heavy water project.

chr0naut replied with

The German part of the company, that Eugen Schwab directed, did not produce the flame-thowers. The entry in the accounting record clearly says the order was shipped from Switzerland

You and chr0naut are basically saying the same thing.

It's about slave workers used at those factories, not flamethrowers. You just got yourself distracted by that, but now I know where you confusion sits.

You made a big deal out of it even posted a video about it.

As for the rest of your post, yeah some people had slaves hundreds of years ago and some had them 75 years ago and some have them now. What does that have to do with the topic of the thread?

a reply to: daskakik

It's okay, go on telling me what I think lol.

You made a big deal out of it even posted a video about it.

Lie. Again, quote me but you can't.

I think you are the one that is confused, not only do you try to tell me what I think repeatedly, you also seem to be delusional and halucinating.

The video is an informational video how awesome those gas cans are, it has nothing to do with the topic itself and was a side note to another member.

Again, confused much?

originally posted by: TDDAgain
It's okay, go on telling me what I think lol.

No, I posted what you said and what you have been making a big deal about with another member, although you both said pretty much the same thing "Eugen Schwab did not make flamethrowers".

Lie. Again, quote me but you can't.

This isn't your post?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

ETA: Funny how you said I was lying and then give a reason for the video that you said I was lying about.

The video is an informational video how awesome those gas cans are, it has nothing to do with the topic itself and was a side note to another member.

a reply to: daskakik

Yes, it's an unrelated post to another member about those freaking awesome gasoline canisters.

What's your problem with that. What does it prove to you? That I am nerdy about cars and stuff?

I quit it now, not worth the time and my heart rate is going up because you obtuseness makes me angry.

Go visit the two links if you want to educate yourself. CIAO

originally posted by: TDDAgain
Go visit the two links if you want to educate yourself. CIAO

Already did, but, like I said, I don't hold sons responsible for the sins of their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers so those two links are meaningless.

Klaus, which this thread is about, is in his mid 80's and will probably die in the next decade. We are nowhere close to a one world government, which I believe will happen sooner or later, but probably not in our lifetime and definitely won't have Klaus on a ballot, which is why I said this thread is BS.

The only problem I had was trying to figure out why you were arguing with someone who basically said the same thing you did.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
He's the man who we all trust to reset the world and lead us into the 4th industrial revolution, including encouraging the use of safe and effective vaccines, and enforcing things like digital ID's, as well ensuring you will own nothing, but will be happy. He fights for good, seeking to censor disinformation, and ensure all corporations conform to ESG policies. He has our best interests at heart, and we should be grateful to have such a strong leader crafting global policies.

Or does he?

Is the real Klaus Schwab a kindly old uncle figure wishing to do good for humanity, or is he really the son of a Nazi collaborator who used slave labour and aided Nazi efforts to obtain the first atomic bomb?

The answer to this question literally determines the future of humanity. That's because, this man has an incredible amount of power and if he is secretly up to no good, then there's a pretty big chance he's on board with depopulation. Although, from his perspective, It's not really a bad thing if you think about it. Klaus probably sees it as "tough love", were we need to cull a large number of humans to save the rest of the humans as well as the planet itself. If you could just go ahead and... die... that would be great... mmkay?

It turns out that the bond villain wannabe isn't a wannabe. The nut doesn't fall far from the tree, it just gets smarter and even more well connected. Klaus Schwab's father was a close confidant of Hitler and ran a factory with forced laborer's including POW's. This factory idea may have given Klaus the idea for the future when all the people who own nothing are working for free, but of course, they are "happy."

Back in the Escher-Wyss factory in Ravensburg, Eugen Schwab had been busy putting forced labourers to work at his model Nazi company. During the years of World War II, nearly 3,600 forced labourers worked in Ravensburg, including at Escher Wyss. According to the city archivist in Ravensburg✎ EditSign, Andrea Schmuder, the Escher-Wyss machine factory in Ravensburg employed between 198 and 203 civil workers and POWs during the war. Karl Schweizer, a local Lindau historian, states that Escher-Wyss maintained a small special camp for forced labourers on the factory premises.

Incredibly, somehow Klaus was able to position himself with front row seats to the world trade center attacks, having witnessed the attack from a comfortable distance away in 2001. This is quite the coincidence considering Klaus didn't live in the United States at the time.

On the morning of 11 September 2001, Klaus Schwab sat having breakfast in the Park East Synagogue in New York City with Rabbi Arthur Schneier, former Vice President for the World Jewish Congress and close associate of the Bronfman and Lauder families. Together, the two men watched one of the most impactful events of the next twenty years unfold as planes struck the World Trade Center buildings.

Klaus also admits one of his biggest influences was one of his college professors, Henry Kisinger, the most notorious living war criminal, responsible for countless deaths, including US service members.

All in all, Klaus isn't such a bad guy. He wrote a pretty cool book you can buy on amazon, called Covid-19, The Great Reset, which he somehow wrote and published in less than 3 months after the pandemic began. It's a good read, but in general it sort of explains how you will own nothing, although its hard to see how that will happen without a lot of war, and a tyrannical one world government.

But, so what? The game is on, and the mRNA vaccines are 100% safe and effective.


SOURCE

RECENT TWITTER ACTIVITY

And , George Soros was a Nazi Collaborator who sent his Fellow Jews to the Death Camps . Does anyone see a Pattern Here Among these 4th Reich Maniacs ?

a reply to: daskakik
I agree that children are not responsible for the sins of their parents.

They would have to repeat them and do their own sins.

So tell me, what did you learn in these two articles?

originally posted by: TDDAgain
So tell me, what did you learn in these two articles?

That some swiss dude from the 19th century had some slaves.

Don't know what that has to do with the topic of the thread, Karl, since he probably hasn't had any.

His dad moving and shaking in Nazi Germany doesn't really say anything about him either. That was pretty much the point. Well, that and the fact that he isn't up for election for world president because humanity isn't there yet.

a reply to: daskakik

" Klaus, which this thread is about, is in his mid 80's and will probably die in the next decade "


No he Will Not . Look at Henry Alfred Kissinger , 98 and Still Breathing . They Both Belong to the " SAME CLUB " . Klaus has ACCESS to Advanced Medical Technology that We " Mere Mortals " could Only Dream About . " Gen. 6:3 Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one hundred and twenty years .” ..........Hmm...

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0


But, so what? The game is on, and the mRNA vaccines are 100% safe and effective.

According to the doom porn lovers on the far right, anyone who had an mRNA vaccine should be dead by now.

How's that one working out?

Guess You Missed the NWO Memo - A Painful Slow Death by Body Degeneration due to Prion Reconfiguring of their Naturally Born DNA in 4 to 5 Years for the Foolish Useless Eaters that Took their Poison Hook , Line , and Sinker.....................R.I.P .............






Oh , and I will Catch You Later jamespond . Oh Wait....

Just tallying the name count in this comment so we don't forget that you are talking about, wait who was it? Oh, yeah. Klaus Schwab.

1st paragraph: 4 times
2nd paragraph: 1 time
3rd paragraph: 3 times
4th paragraph: 3 times

So, that second paragraph scored pretty low. You gotta get those numbers up. Why don't you go back and edit it to mention his name a couple more times. I'd hate for that one to ruin your average.
a reply to: Buvvy

a reply to: chr0naut

If you try and force me to have a mandatory vaccination against my will, i can assure you it won't save lives, quite the opposite.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: chr0naut

If you try and force me to have a mandatory vaccination against my will, i can assure you it won't save lives, quite the opposite.

It Should Take Lives , and there is the Rub Horatio . Self Preservation Supercedes Dictates or Mandates From " Authority Figures " that Threaten your Personal Well " Being " .