It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Let it sink in that your post is now to old for you to edit.
originally posted by: chr0naut
"47178 Escher-Wyss of Switzerland is working on a large order for Germany. Flame-throwers are despatched from Switzerland under the name Brennstoffbehaelter. 1 p. Sept. 1944" - From Records of the Office of Strategic Services (RG 226)
Records of the Research and Analysis Branch, in the US National Archives of Holocaust Era Assets.
originally posted by: TDDAgain
originally posted by: chr0naut
"47178 Escher-Wyss of Switzerland is working on a large order for Germany. Flame-throwers are despatched from Switzerland under the name Brennstoffbehaelter. 1 p. Sept. 1944" - From Records of the Office of Strategic Services (RG 226)
Records of the Research and Analysis Branch, in the US National Archives of Holocaust Era Assets.
Too bad that "Brennstoffbehaelter" means "gasoline can" and isn't a flame thrower. Therefor I question your source and knowledge overall about WW2 in general.
- Zurich was involved in slave trading
Alfred Escher's heritage is based on slave work
Oh and please insult my language skills a second time, after YOU read all the German stuff and understood it
As you have demonstrated a few times now, your comprehension, and language skills, are not what you might believe them to be.
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: jamespond
Yeah, good idea, pick the most extreme viewpoint you can find, attack it and feel better afterwards.
Were you for or against mandated vaccines for everyone with 0 exception?
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: chr0naut
I don't think you are going to win this argument with google, sitting your armchair in NZ against a local German that has access to a ton of more information than you. You can, of course, descend down on my language skills.
As you have demonstrated a few times now, your comprehension, and language skills, are not what you might believe them to be.
Tell that to the people on this website and elsewhere, stating the complete difference.
This is you:
Copied and pasted directly from your link.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advises physicians to respect the refusal of parents to vaccinate their child after adequate discussion, unless the child is put at significant risk of harm (e.g., during an epidemic, or after a deep and contaminated puncture wound). Under such circumstances, the AAP states that parental refusal of immunization constitutes a form of medical neglect and should be reported to state child protective services agencies.
I was not making comment on your German language skills. I was referring to the language were were using in these posts.
Also, if you have access to more information than me, why don't you support your case by linking to, or otherwise referencing, it?
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: chr0naut
I was not making comment on your German language skills. I was referring to the language were were using in these posts.
Oh really? You don't say! What makes it even more pathetic, really.
Also, if you have access to more information than me, why don't you support your case by linking to, or otherwise referencing, it?
Because it's mostly German sources. Have you read the other sources? Understood and comprehended them? I don't think so. I gave you a towline to work yourself to the truth. You decided to skim over it and went with the 1800 slave trade argument.
That's pathetic.