Pfizer: Huge risks for those who are vaccinated.

originally posted by: oddnutz
Most ineffective vaccine ever mass administered
More reported adverse events and deaths than all other vaccines combined

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

how many shots are you really willing to take?
some people are up to 4 in 12 months
so very effective you roll up your sleeve every 3 months

Several common vaccines require more than 3 shots for full effect. The polio vaccine, which eliminated the disease in the US in 24 years, required a minimum of 4 vaccinations for full effect.

So far, no authority has officially approved more than 4 shots for a COVID-19 vaccine.

If you find biontech the company who created this jab a janky source. Whatever rocks your cradle

a reply to: olaru12

a reply to: litterbaux

If it took any more than a couple of weeks then that blows the muppets nonsense out the window.

Coz that's what he was claiming.

Anyhoo we are all just fine and not dying with AIDS down to vaccination ta very much.

Vaccines don't cause AIDS son, HIV on the other hand well that will get you there eventually.

Have a nice day, try not to swallow too much paranoia.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Another day and look at that still all not dead with AIDS yet.

Imagine that.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Another day and look at that still all not dead with AIDS yet.

Imagine that.

What's your hurry? Give it 3-5 years before you start complaining.

a reply to: Sander1976

Just as Bob Dylan does not need a weatherman to tell him which way the wind is blowing, in 2022 I don't need Pfizer to tell me the shots are dangerous. I've known that for quite some time now, thanks to independent media like Stew Peters and so many more.

In a sane world those who perpetrated the fraud would have been prosecuted and punished, but this is not a sane world. As MLK pointed out, we live in a time of guided missiles and unguided leaders.

a reply to: underpass61

Thats just it underpass61 we are not complaining because we are all just fine.

As to hurry why would anybody be in a hurry to get AIDS?

If you want a spoon for the doom porn you batter in if you like the taste.

Fact of the matter is v1rtu0s0 gets his jollies off feeding you the stuff in spades.

Without one iota of real proof to support his nonsensical mince other than to present spurious doom porn from other halfwits.

Its not even his own homework.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: underpass61

Thats just it underpass61 we are not complaining because we are all just fine.

As to hurry why would anybody be in a hurry to get AIDS?

If you want a spoon for the doom porn you batter in if you like the taste.

Fact of the matter is v1rtu0s0 gets his jollies off feeding you the stuff in spades.

Without one iota of real proof to support his nonsensical mince other than to present spurious doom porn from other halfwits.

Its not even his own homework.

You're in a hurry to see long term side effects. It's too bad pfizer "vaccinated" all their trial participants so they could hide the long term safety issues. Now you just have to wait and hope something doesn't happen to you, although it's not looking good since you're probably on your 5th booster.

I've posted more evidence in a few months than you ever will in your entire life. But then again, it's not like it's your purpose to post anything credible, you're just looking for validation.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Evidence of doom porn maybe.

And according to you these ""side effects"" should have given us all AIDS weeks ago now and we should be dropping like flies, accept computer says "No". LoL

As to validation, i did not know you did parking.

a reply to: andy06shake

Have you had a chance to examine your own blood under a microscope since you've taken the shots?

It's not pretty.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: oddnutz
Most ineffective vaccine ever mass administered
More reported adverse events and deaths than all other vaccines combined

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

how many shots are you really willing to take?
some people are up to 4 in 12 months
so very effective you roll up your sleeve every 3 months

Several common vaccines require more than 3 shots for full effect. The polio vaccine, which eliminated the disease in the US in 24 years, required a minimum of 4 vaccinations for full effect.

So far, no authority has officially approved more than 4 shots for a COVID-19 vaccine.

So in other words we are the experiment.

originally posted by: fernalley

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: oddnutz
Most ineffective vaccine ever mass administered
More reported adverse events and deaths than all other vaccines combined

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

how many shots are you really willing to take?
some people are up to 4 in 12 months
so very effective you roll up your sleeve every 3 months

Several common vaccines require more than 3 shots for full effect. The polio vaccine, which eliminated the disease in the US in 24 years, required a minimum of 4 vaccinations for full effect.

So far, no authority has officially approved more than 4 shots for a COVID-19 vaccine.

So in other words we are the experiment.

If chr0naut wants to be the experiment for a virus with a 99.7%+ suvival rate when 95%+ already has immunity and they want to continue to get experimental shots, more power to them. But you won't be forcing it on me.

The therapeutics issues. Why didn't the govt follow the law when it came to the therapeutics? It was known that Ivermectin and other therapeutics were working. According to the law if there were known cures to Covid the FDA never should have approved the experimental vaccines.

Instead we got experimental vaccines and a full court press in the news media trying to disprove the effectiveness of the therapeutics. Something was very wrong there. Essentially we have a major conspiracy here with a massive coverup to boot.

Literally heads should be rolling.

a reply to: chr0naut

37 different vaccines with completely different chemicals make-ups are in that total.
The original formula in some of the mRNA versions are not the same from the original to today.

So you should follow the several billion flies and eat.... After all they are ok and no side effects.

Also remember billions of people have taken a breath over the last few years and not caught the Infection. Seems like breathing is a good vaccine.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: fernalley

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: oddnutz
Most ineffective vaccine ever mass administered
More reported adverse events and deaths than all other vaccines combined

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

how many shots are you really willing to take?
some people are up to 4 in 12 months
so very effective you roll up your sleeve every 3 months

Several common vaccines require more than 3 shots for full effect. The polio vaccine, which eliminated the disease in the US in 24 years, required a minimum of 4 vaccinations for full effect.

So far, no authority has officially approved more than 4 shots for a COVID-19 vaccine.

So in other words we are the experiment.

If chr0naut wants to be the experiment for a virus with a 99.7%+ suvival rate when 95%+ already has immunity and they want to continue to get experimental shots, more power to them. But you won't be forcing it on me.

Where does the "informed consent " come in? They will keep pumping this substance into people untill...? Keep changing those goal post for what is fully vaccinated. I knew when our PM bought 11 jabs for every person it would be endless.

Then they published this:

Unvaccinated people increase risk of COVID-19 infection among vaccinated: study

Which is based on models and the author has paid ties to the pharmaceuticals. What is this "vaccine" actually doing then if it cant do what a vaccine is suppose to do?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Hi v1rtu0s0.

Care to explain why we here in the UK are not all dead with AIDS yet?

Has to be asked - does everyone with aids die within a year of developing it?

How long do you propose to wait before documenting all the adverse effects, including all-cause mortality?

There is a reason why medication and vaccines takes YEARS before being approved.

This EUA is the exception, not the rule.

originally posted by: chr0naut

No, these people are really suffering health problems. Common health problems - problems that existed and occurred in the population before the vaccines were created.

It’s like saying people who were drinking contaminated water due to hexavalent chromium runoff from P&G plant and developed cancers or other health complications and died prematurely are just the same as all other people before and around them.

And, I mean, someone suffering an adverse reaction from a vaccination probably wouldn't have it months after the jab. They'd have it while the vaccine was at the maximum level in their system, wouldn't they?

There are several assumptions you make here which so not agree with rigorous science as you put it. First, the majority of periomyocarditis cases develop in the first two weeks post vaccination m. Second, nobody know what and when the vaccine maximum levels are. Third, every medical intervention (drugs, vaccines) require years of follow up to ascertain full effects, whether real or coincidental.

Also, because of the small number of components of mRNA vaccines, adverse reactions would be few, and of very specific types.

Wow you must know more than the vaccine manufacturers themselves! Do you believe in fairy tales or just write them for others? Pfizer itself logged a huge number of varying AEs during clinical trials, over 1200.

Also, people who die of a completely different pathogen, are unlikely to be from the vaccine (or from COVID-19). There were a few cases on that site, where that happened.

This is why all-cause mortality is a metric in any pharmaceutical product that hits the market. Except in this one.

You see, medical science is very physical and rigorous. When people have a condition, it has definitive metabolic pathways that explain and describe why things are as they are.

I can’t help but wonder, are you a children’s book author? Because what you write is make belief like Santa and the Easter bunny. Medical science answers a lot, but there is a lot that it cannot answer yet. Any medical doctor will tell you there are diseases and illnesses that people experience which they don’t understand.

Most of these people have had the jab months before they began to suffer from what were already common illnesses before there were vaccines, and there are illnesses easily attributable to other causes, that could not be from the vaccines.

Some have been common, some have been rare, the issue is not that these are new diseases, the issue is that people without health conditions suddenly started developing all these issues. Coincidence? Some could be, but you can’t dismiss all. Not even big pharma dismisses such reactions, as normally they are logged under adverse events.

But some of them, no doubt, also have had real adverse reactions to the vaccines, but the site attributes nearly everything to the vaccine, and has minimal actual medical details that identify if it was the vaccine, or some other cause.

That’s why instead of opining, you should examine the data that is logged in vaers.

Also, the linked site is not actually a forum of sufferers of disease, where one may post, it is an aggregation site that pulls in content from other sites, primarily from Facebook. It is an anonymously set up Wordpress site running off a DNS registrant called Epik.com.

Again, please explain away all the vaers data which shows more AE for this vaccine than all other vaccines combined for the last 40 years.

originally posted by: gandalph

This EUA is the exception, not the rule.

Even Biontech is worried they won't get full authorization after the EUA. But tell that to the jab extremists According to them it's already approved and tested properly.

Don't mention we are still in trial fase 3 they will go berserk.

According to Obama no guinea pigs here, or was it the other way around.....

originally posted by: fernalley

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: oddnutz
Most ineffective vaccine ever mass administered
More reported adverse events and deaths than all other vaccines combined

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

how many shots are you really willing to take?
some people are up to 4 in 12 months
so very effective you roll up your sleeve every 3 months

Several common vaccines require more than 3 shots for full effect. The polio vaccine, which eliminated the disease in the US in 24 years, required a minimum of 4 vaccinations for full effect.

So far, no authority has officially approved more than 4 shots for a COVID-19 vaccine.

So in other words we are the experiment.

Were we ever not, with anything? foods - drugs - pesticides - chemicals - radiation - psychology - marketing?