UKHSA's Own Data Shows Triple Vaccinated Die At 3x The Rate As Double Single And Unvaccinated

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

My sides!

How hilarious.

Do you have common sense over there?

You just don't get ratios, percentages, group mathematics and probably just plain math.

That's OK

Go back half-drunk to your pub with your gap-toothed smile.

A lot of people don't seem to get it.

3x the number of triple vaccinated people die. That's a fact. There's no "but what had happened wuz..."

And there's no studies or evidence to prove the next step of the argument. Most of these "vulnerable" people should have been wiped out already from before there was ever a vaccine. And if the vaccinated who are vulnerable are dying at 3x the rate, that's one s# vaccine that provides no benefit.

The CEO of AstraZeneca said these vulnerable people need to AVOID the vaccine. They knew this back in 2020.

Precisely.

And, totally shocking people nowadays can't understand such simple group comparisons, rates, etc


Idiocracy...and those people vote...smh...

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

My sides!

How hilarious.

Do you have common sense over there?

You just don't get ratios, percentages, group mathematics and probably just plain math.

That's OK

Go back half-drunk to your pub with your gap-toothed smile.

A lot of people don't seem to get it.

3x the number of triple vaccinated people die. That's a fact. There's no "but what had happened wuz..."

And there's no studies or evidence to prove the next step of the argument. Most of these "vulnerable" people should have been wiped out already from before there was ever a vaccine. And if the vaccinated who are vulnerable are dying at 3x the rate, that's one s# vaccine that provides no benefit.

The CEO of AstraZeneca said these vulnerable people need to AVOID the vaccine. They knew this back in 2020.

Precisely.

And, totally shocking people nowadays can't understand such simple group comparisons, rates, etc


Idiocracy...and those people vote...smh...

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Your original post was garbage.



As has been shown by multiple posters.

Boo hoo.


Deal with it.

Diddums.

Indeed.

Welcome to VAIDS ladies and gentlemen

Whats the score now for conspiracy theorists?

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian
Welcome to VAIDS ladies and gentlemen

Whats the score now for conspiracy theorists?

I don't believe in VAIDS, but neither do I believe the vaccine is what they want us to think it is. That doesn't mean I think it's some conspiracy. I simply don't think it works like they thought it would.

I think COVID is something that we aren't going to have an effective vaccine for, no matter the type of shot involved. It just mutates too readily and rapidly.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

This is an indication that the mRNA vaccines are no good. One of the many clues. It's not proof. But if we put all those indications together, then a light must go on, right? No way.
If I've learned anything in my life, it's that the best theories are undermined by taking one dubious point out of them and insisting on it. That's how one sow doubt. And doubt is enough to put you in the pseudo category. Slowly you lose your credibility ... until no one takes you seriously anymore. The media is playing us. Or is there still anyone who doubts that? Censorship in an unimaginable way? Does anyone doubt this? Today in the most popular news internet paper: liver inflammation in children. Certainly not the vaccines' fault. Mentioned twice. Can I read the whole article? Yes. Up to and including all the details and the opinion of the most famous virologist. Every other article stops after you read a few sentences. You must then subscribe to continue. Still no light?
Drs Cole, Dolores Cahill, Vanden Bossche, Luc Montagnier (RIP), McCullough, famous advocates etc. who stand up to the vaccines. Are you reading anything in the mainstream media? No. And if you read anything at all, they are labeled as quacks or fools. Sad sad world. Shame on those who attack the messenger here in a manner just polite enough not to be expunged. It feels to me like those critics weigh their words just enough to not to openly ridicule the messenger. To me this way of communication feels worse than an overt and derogatory reproach. I feel you would love to go that far ...but ... moderators ... you know far better than me ...

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian
Welcome to VAIDS ladies and gentlemen

Whats the score now for conspiracy theorists?

Let's see:

Shedding - False
Magnetism - False
Carbon nanoparticles - False
Graphene - False (These seem to be a slightly different conspiracy from the one above)
Bluetooth hotspots - False
Mass deaths within a year - False
All population control conspiracies - False
The vax being ineffective - False
Mass heart attack deaths - False
Vax killing air travellers in higher numbers - False
VAEDS (Vax destroying your immunity to other diseases) - False

And that's without counting the numerous ones about masks giving you carbon dioxide poisoning or causing oxygen deprivation.

Pretty much the only thing that's even remotely true is the one about the government not wanting to talk about natural immunity, and even then that's not really a conspiracy, it's just beurocracy.

originally posted by: zandra
a reply to: Oldcarpy2Does anyone doubt this? Today in the most popular news internet paper: liver inflammation in children. Certainly not the vaccines' fault. Mentioned twice.

We know for a fact that the vax doesn't cause this because most cases actually occurred in the UK, and were in children under the age of 10.

Exactly Zero percent of these children were vaxxed. 0, none, Nada, absolutely none of the effected children had been vaxxed:

Link

There is no link to the COVID-19 vaccine. None of the currently confirmed cases in the UK has been vaccinated.

a reply to: ketsuko

either do I believe the vaccine is what they want us to think it is.

Then what is it?

The official press briefings were very accurate when it came to things like side effects and efficacy, and there doesn't seem to be any other agenda other than keeping serious covid infections down so that everyone can get back on with their lives.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian
Welcome to VAIDS ladies and gentlemen

Whats the score now for conspiracy theorists?

Shedding - False
Magnetism - False
Carbon nanoparticles - False
Graphene - False (These seem to be a slightly different conspiracy from the one above)
Bluetooth hotspots - False
Mass deaths within a year - False
All population control conspiracies - False
The vax being ineffective - False
Mass heart attack deaths - False
Vax killing air travellers in higher numbers - False
VAEDS (Vax destroying your immunity to other diseases) - False

Where do you even get the first 5 from in this thread? Do you just add random things to try to pad your group of "points"?

It's obvious what you're doing, besides lying and using untrustworthy "sources."

Face it, you're a true believer. You believe in faucism at any cost, even if someone provided you with evidence you would deny it no matter what. Because you are so invested in your beliefs, the truth doesn't matter, only being right.

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

EX:
100 in group A, 24 die
50 in group B, 3 die

Group A is dying at 4X the rate of group B

Thought it was pretty straight forward. The cognitive dissonance is strong, especially with the oldcarpy types. The vaccine is supposed to protect, not be neutral or negative. The fact the triple vaccinated is 4x more is extremely concerning, but even if it were 50/50 that would be terrible too.

These are by far the least effective and most dangerous shots ever administered world wide. The program should have been shutdown 15 months ago. The vaccine sucks.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: ketsuko

None of which detracts from the fact that the people who are most likely to be triple vaxxed are also the people who are most likely to die if they get sick.

If you look at the curve it's mostly the elderly and sick who are dying, which is exactly what you'd expect.

The initial push for the vax was, "If you are elderly or have multiple comorbidities, the vax will protect you."

So you agree they were lying?

If you'd watched the official press briefings you'd know that they gave out percentages of how much protection the vax gives you. None of which were 100 percent.

Compare this to the number of people who get Covid and the number who die, and then compare it to the same figures form 2020 and early 2021, and you'll see that they were pretty accurate.

The only people who claim that the vax is 100 percent effective are idiots, and people like the OP who seem to think that vax are either 100 percent effective or 0 percent effective.

Fauci is on record saying virtually 100%. A swing and a miss.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Others have pointed out to you the flaws in your argument, not just me.

More ad homs?

Tsk.

So what the OP is saying as is also the guy in the video is that old and unhealthy people die at a higher rate than younger healthy people...well no sh!t... geez


Lets say no one was vacced, would to OP post that old and unhealthy people are dying to the virus at 20x or 30x and not 3x more than young healthy people?

I think not...

No it was comparing vac/unvaccinated by age group. It wasn’t comparing 100 year old vaccinated patients to 30 years unvaccinated patients. The triple vaxxed are dying more in ALL age groups. Not good news for mRNA advocates. The vaccine is garbage.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian
Welcome to VAIDS ladies and gentlemen

Whats the score now for conspiracy theorists?

Let's see:

Shedding - False
Magnetism - False
Carbon nanoparticles - False
Graphene - False (These seem to be a slightly different conspiracy from the one above)
Bluetooth hotspots - False
Mass deaths within a year - False
All population control conspiracies - False
The vax being ineffective - False
Mass heart attack deaths - False
Vax killing air travellers in higher numbers - False
VAEDS (Vax destroying your immunity to other diseases) - False

And that's without counting the numerous ones about masks giving you carbon dioxide poisoning or causing oxygen deprivation.

Pretty much the only thing that's even remotely true is the one about the government not wanting to talk about natural immunity, and even then that's not really a conspiracy, it's just beurocracy.

What's the score now for the low iQ gullible crowd:

Let's see.

Covid "vaccine" protects against spread: NO

Covid "vaccine" protects against infection: NO

Covid "vaccine" protects against death: NO

...Unlike any other normal vaccine!
So bad that in fact, the CDC had to redefine the meaning of "vaccine" to suit this failed Pfizer/Moderna gene therapy.

Masks did not work, as anyone with iQ above 80 could have told you as virus particles are just too damn small. This is precisely why viral biological reaserch facilities don't use masks but use "astronaut suits".
Using anything less is mere uselss virtue signalling.

Same goes for "lockdowns". Lockdowns were first introduced by the Communist Party of China. Lockdowns are a political tool of oppression and control, not a long standing medical practice like "quarantine", where only those actually sick are isolated, not entire populations.


Covid "vaccines" - useless
Lockdowns - useless
Masks - useless

a reply to: M5xaz

So anyone who dares to have a different opinion to the likes of you are "low IQ gullible"?

That is just tedious and pathetic.

This does not constitute reasoned debate.

It's just insulting.