Vaxxt Commercial Airline Pilot's Heart Stops Minutes After Landing Narrowly Averting Disaster

Last Thursday vaccinated pilot captain Snow was landing a commercial airplane with over 200 passengers on board, and his heart stopped only minutes after landing the plane. If this happened a few minutes earlier it could have been a disaster. Commercial airline pilot Joshua Yoder who runs the Freedom Flyers foundation explains how he is receiving phone calls every single day from pilots suffering vaccine effects including one woman who has had 4 strokes after 2 jabs and doesn't think she will live much longer. Others who have spoke to Joshua Yoder say they are flying with chest pains, but won't come forward because it would be a career ending admission. Captain snow was coerced to get the vaccine as he did not want to lose his job. Snow was the only person in his family to get it, and started having issues that began immediately after the jab that got progressively worse.


SOURCE VIDEO

Steve Kirsch discovered this story was ignored by the mainstream media. A pilot having his heart stop minutes after landing isn't news of course.

Steve Kirsch Analysis

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

At least it sounds like the freedomflyers will sue the airlines

Before covid vaccines and covid this has happened more than once. An American airlines pilot had a heart attack on short final whereby the monitoring pilot took over the controls and landed the aircraft safely.

The vaccine story and dead pilots has been reported (also more than once) I think it was South West Airlines that had a group of pilots saying they would not take the vaccine due to an increase in medical problems after the vaccine. 1800 flights cancelled due to employee walk out after the vaccine mandate. youtu.be... Official news was it was due to weather and FAA yet the weather did not affect the other airlines.

originally posted by: 727Sky
Before covid vaccines and covid this has happened more than once. An American airlines pilot had a heart attack on short final whereby the monitoring pilot took over the controls and landed the aircraft safely.

The vaccine story and dead pilots has been reported (also more than once) I think it was South West Airlines that had a group of pilots saying they would not take the vaccine due to an increase in medical problems after the vaccine. 1800 flights cancelled due to employee walk out after the vaccine mandate. youtu.be... Official news was it was due to weather and FAA yet the weather did not affect the other airlines.

This one didn't even make the mainstream news. That's the biggest clue its being covered up. Also, do you want a workforce of pilots all waiting to see if they have a heart attack in the middle of landing a plane? Did you watch the video? Everyday pilots are contacting him with medical issues like chest pains.

Hart attics happen you guise.

Like 10 billion a day.

Nothing to do with the v-shot.

Spare me the falsities, there have been more cardiac related deaths to otherwise healthy people who have opted in to be part of this experiment. But it's always swept under the rug. Face it. This is an experiment, and you are all - not us who will not partake - the guinea pigs.. Or more likely, the lab rats. No more cheese for you unless you let me stick a needle in you that might or might not, kill you over time.

So, you're telling me pilots are having chest pains but not reporting it? Because they are afraid it might "end their career".

Hmmmm?

So instead, they are going to put passenger lives at risk? Is that what you are telling me? And at the same time, putting their own lives at risk? Is that what you are telling me?


a reply to: v1rtu0s0

You could survive a boat, train or car wreck, but when a plane drops out of the sky, you can kiss your asterisk goodbye.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
So, you're telling me pilots are having chest pains but not reporting it? Because they are afraid it might "end their career".

Hmmmm?

So instead, they are going to put passenger lives at risk? Is that what you are telling me? And at the same time, putting their own lives at risk? Is that what you are telling me?


a reply to: v1rtu0s0

If you actually care, you can go to the freedom flyers website.

www.usfreedomflyers.org...

They didn't make this website up for no reason.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
So, you're telling me pilots are having chest pains but not reporting it? Because they are afraid it might "end their career".

Hmmmm?

So instead, they are going to put passenger lives at risk? Is that what you are telling me? And at the same time, putting their own lives at risk? Is that what you are telling me?


a reply to: v1rtu0s0

not that you will come back to answer. but if you read the thread, that is what "freedom Flyers" is saying, so yea. Is that what you are asking?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

According to the Israeli study he's far too old, and had his shot far too long ago, for this to be vax related.

The heart problems effected young men, and began on average within 1-3 days of getting the shot. So far, there have been zero confirmed cases of older men having vax related heart attacks after getting the shot that weren't later determined to be a complete coincidence.

This guy was married, cisgender and heterosexual. He also ate meat and regularly used a 4G phone. He wore lace up shoes, and a tie. Next time this guy so much as blows his nose pick one and blame it.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

so is this you admitting that the vax does in fact kill people?

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
If this happened a few minutes earlier it could have been a disaster.

This may come as a giant surprise but they have this thing called a 'co-pilot' who can land the aircraft themselves. I know, it's crazy that they actually put two people on the same plane that can do that. Who would have thought.

And good to know the organization in the OP link takes no responsibility for any info and links provided, but they certainly will accept your financial support.

Please note that the Organization does not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites.
Errors and Omissions Disclaimer: The information given by the Service is for general guidance on matters of interest only.

The Service may contain views and opinions which are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other author, agency, organization, employer or organization, including the Organization

In no event shall the Organization or its suppliers be liable for any special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with your access or use or inability to access or use the Service.
“Use at Your Own Risk”

All information in the Service is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: AaarghZombies

so is this you admitting that the vax does in fact kill people?

Ah, yes, wordplay. You're making it sound like I ever denied it.

Yes, in some exceedingly rare cases people die. Such as the female reported from the UK who died form a blood clot quite early on. It's why they switched up the vax regime so that people in her age bracket were given an alternative.

well over 1 billion people have been vaxxed, a tiny percentage of them have been harmed by it. The sources in my signature however demonstrate how the mortality curve changed once the vax was introduced, and that many more people have been saved than have been harmed.

Statistically, the vax is roughly on par with most other shots in terms of mortality.

You're actually more likely to be killed by a shark than the vax. In fact, you're significantly more likely to be killed by your current or former partner than by the vax.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I'm not sure if you are aware of this or not, but ANY and I do mean ANY discussion of harm by the vax is shut down and shouted out. Almost as if we aren't allowed to talk about it. At all. Even a little.

I wonder if you comprehend the reason why people went nuts over all this, when that was and has been the game plan?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies


You're actually more likely to be killed by a shark than the vax. In fact, you're significantly more likely to be killed by your current or former partner than by the vax.

not taking the vax gives you a 100% chance of NOT being harmed by the vax. You just have to take your chances of 1. getting the virus, and then 2. dying from it. Which is equally as rare.

Not that you can understand this part, but I'll say it for others here. Forcing people to take drugs is a bad approach to any problem. The non dickface approach would be to educate everyone as best you can, and let people make up their own mind as to how they would like to proceed. If you take a swing at me, I'm much more likely to swing back, than smile and ask you if you want another shot. That explains the pushback on this, and may help you understand why so many try so hard to demonize this. Newton's third law in action.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I'm not sure if you are aware of this or not, but ANY and I do mean ANY discussion of harm by the vax is shut down and shouted out.

Usually by people like you. In fact you're doing it right now.

I'm using real world data and real world statistics and you're not even willing to discuss them. You just want me out of this debate so that you can post doom porn.

If you say that the Israeli study showed that fewer than 1 in 500,000 young men (and usually only young men) have serious heart issues after taking the vax any serious scientifically minded person will be perfectly willing to talk to you, but you ... you just want to shut the debate down.

a reply to: network dude

not taking the vax gives you a 100% chance of NOT being harmed by the vax.

Staying a virgin will protect you from most STD.

dying from it. Which is equally as rare.

Yes, but here in the real world covid death is merely the most extreme outcome of having covid. It's perfectly possible to survive, but be bankrupted by the cost of critical care.

It's also possible to simply miss a couple of shifts through being sick or quarantined, which for a lot of people around the world means not being able to afford food or not being able to make the rent.

Forcing people to take drugs is a bad approach to any problem.

Which you know I agree with since you've obviously read my past comments. I'm anti mandate in general.

The non dickface approach would be to educate everyone as best you can, and let people make up their own mind as to how they would like to proceed.

Which would necessitate censoring people like you, since you spread ignorance and fear, or at least putting content warnings in everything that you say, because people come away less educated after reading your comments.

I'm against censorship, and I'd dearly love to live in a world where you could voice dissenting opinions, which is why I choose to respond to comments like yours to counter them, rather than calling for them to be deleted. I'm not going to stop you from speaking, but I am going to try to convince people that you are wrong.

If you take a swing at me, I'm much more likely to swing back,

Again, I'm in perfect agreement with you on this one.

That explains the pushback on this, and may help you understand why so many try so hard to demonize this.

I'm not disagreeing with you, but posting doom porn, or supporting the people who post it only makes things worse. It's not a productive way to go about this. Especially since so much of the doom porn is outright false.

Push back by saying that covid has a low mortality rate, and that we can further reduce it through sensible precautions like social distancing and mask wearing.

Don't push back by saying that the vax contains carbon nano particles and that shedding will steilize African American women, or that wearing a mask will cause your children to suffer from carbon dioxide poisoning.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: network dude

not taking the vax gives you a 100% chance of NOT being harmed by the vax.

Staying a virgin will protect you from most STD.

dying from it. Which is equally as rare.

Yes, but here in the real world covid death is merely the most extreme outcome of having covid. It's perfectly possible to survive, but be bankrupted by the cost of critical care.

It's also possible to simply miss a couple of shifts through being sick or quarantined, which for a lot of people around the world means not being able to afford food or not being able to make the rent.

Forcing people to take drugs is a bad approach to any problem.

Which you know I agree with since you've obviously read my past comments. I'm anti mandate in general.

The non dickface approach would be to educate everyone as best you can, and let people make up their own mind as to how they would like to proceed.

Which would necessitate censoring people like you, since you spread ignorance and fear, or at least putting content warnings in everything that you say, because people come away less educated after reading your comments.

I'm against censorship, and I'd dearly love to live in a world where you could voice dissenting opinions, which is why I choose to respond to comments like yours to counter them, rather than calling for them to be deleted. I'm not going to stop you from speaking, but I am going to try to convince people that you are wrong.

If you take a swing at me, I'm much more likely to swing back,

Again, I'm in perfect agreement with you on this one.

That explains the pushback on this, and may help you understand why so many try so hard to demonize this.

I'm not disagreeing with you, but posting doom porn, or supporting the people who post it only makes things worse. It's not a productive way to go about this. Especially since so much of the doom porn is outright false.

Push back by saying that covid has a low mortality rate, and that we can further reduce it through sensible precautions like social distancing and mask wearing.

Don't push back by saying that the vax contains carbon nano particles and that shedding will steilize African American women, or that wearing a mask will cause your children to suffer from carbon dioxide poisoning.

What study can you cite that shows what 25 years from now the effects are of these “vaccines”? Or say what effects our children or their children could be subject to? Your faith in big Pharma has been noted by all, do you have anything else to offer?