Hate speech now allowed on Facebook and Instagram, BUT only if it's against Russia.

originally posted by: crayzeed
Could someone please point me to ANY Russian videos (of them fighting or the aftermath of fighting) that are false or propaganda cos I aint seen one yet. But I've seen multiple videos of false, manipulated or with a highly suspect propaganda edge from the Ukrainian side. Just asking.

Neither have I. I'm sure there are some isolated incidents of Russians KIA, but I haven't hardly seen a thing to indicate thousands of their troops being killed.

Whole thing wreaks of BS. The elites are trying everything they can to lure the USA headlong into the conflict ... so Mitt Romney and Joe Biden's kids can keep the corruption and graft pouring money into the family pockets.

a reply to: andy06shake

Don't ever seem to recall the west spitting the dummy out and threatening to use nukes or chemical weapons in any of the Gulf wars which granted were also illegal given the lack of WMD.

In reality it is the West that used nukes, best not forget that when demonizing others. What is the point of having nuclear weapons if you aren't prepared to use them as a last resort? That's why they are a deterrent.

The West didn't 'spit the dummy out' in the Gulf wars because it was never required, they were never under any real threat. Russia is facing a real enemy that can destroy them, not Ukraine of course but all the Western powers chomping at the bit. Perhaps they needed a timely reminder that Russia isn't the ME.

a reply to: midicon

The same people blindly following each and every tune.

A page ripped right from Orwell.

What we see is the introduction of the two minute hate.
The two minute hate is as follows.

"The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part, but, on the contrary, that it was impossible to avoid joining in. Within thirty seconds any pretence was always unnecessary. A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge-hammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one's will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic."

To how many people is the two minute hate their new religion do you figure?

a reply to: Rolicia

It must be virtue signalling hell.

a reply to: midicon

Technically that's America that dropped nuclear weapons in anger, twice.

Canny tag the west with that debacle because its not like they shared the technology, openly anyroad.

The point of having nuclear armaments is supposed to be a deterrent.

As to using them well thats the ultimate mugs game imho.

Russia is issuing the real threats and invading another nation no two ways about the fact of the matter really.

NATO has no interest in the destruction of Russia even if it does have the capability to do so and thats Putin problem really in spades.

Nah they have always allowed hate speech against Conservative, Republicans, and white males.

Just go find a post critical of white males, and change the white or male to something else and repost. Guess which one is flagged as hate speech?

Turns out he was right.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Spacespider

What about the McCarthyism of the 1950s?

Yup, there was a software program that would change mainstream media Woke articles, and social media posts, that were talking about white people, and change them to a minority group (Black people, Jews, etc), to demonstrate how hateful those pieces were. And, par for the course, someone reposted some of them such as tweets with the change and it was censored.

originally posted by: jjkenobi
Nah they have always allowed hate speech against Conservative, Republicans, and white males.

Just go find a post critical of white males, and change the white or male to something else and repost. Guess which one is flagged as hate speech?

originally posted by: Madrusa
a reply to: Spacespider

No the 1940's is when you taught to hate Nazis and not Jews, the 1950's is when you taught to hate European ethnic Nationalism and not Asians, the 1960's is when you taught to hate European Conservatives and not Africans, the 1970's is when you taught to hate the European working class and not Multi-Culturism, the 1980's is when you taught to hate European Religious values and not the Satanic, the 1990's is when you taught to hate European moral values and not nihilism, the 2000's is when you taught to hate European self determinism and not Globalism, the 2010's is when you taught to hate European self expression and not censorship, the 2020's is when you taught to hate European existence and not annihilation.

It is therefore acceptable to hate Russia because they are European, promote Nationalism, Conservative values, Religious values, moral values, self determinism and freedom of cultural self expression and continued self existence, the popular solution to this being promoted is their Nuclear annihilation.

I get a real bad wipe from what you are writing.
Please tell me, what is your view on the National Socialist German Workers' Party ?

a reply to: andy06shake

When will you realise this isn't about the actual war?
Or even about Putin or Russia?
It's about allowing hate speech.
Which you seem to be totally fine with?

a reply to: Rolicia

I gave you perfect examples of web sites that promote "hate speech".

As to me being ok with it, that's a negative.

The premise of your thread seems to be about ""Hate speech"" against ""Russia"". LoL

a reply to: andy06shake

Everything YouSir said is happening as we speak, yet you keep coming with your "shelling civilians and hospials...
If Putin seriously wanted to kill Ukranians, there would be thousands upon thousands dead already.

Viewed from the point of innocent civilians killed and unjustified wars based on lies, the USA deserved the same treatment by big tech then. But we all know that's never gonna happen.

It's a very slippery slope they're on. Social media is so ingrained 8nto modern day life that these companies have a responsibility on their shoulders, and that should be to bring people together, not divide them even more.

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

I llike your hate speech, seems pretty spot on

a reply to: Rolicia

Well if Russia keep on shelling hospitals ile keep bringing it up.

Psychiatric hospitals as well now.

There is no scenario where shelling hospital's and civilians in this day of age is ok and anyone who thinks so is a complete and utter sicko.

The only slippery slope i see is Russia's avenue to their own demise.

If you really believe the only aims and goals of "Social media" is to bring people together then you are sadly mistaken.

As to divide and conquer well that's the colour of humanities day all and every week of the year.

a reply to: Rolicia

We like your repetitive rhetoric is so refreshing.

Its rather obvious your a big Parler fan mate.

No they haven't. I received a 30 day ban 2 days ago for saying "Putin needs to Hitler himself, or it's time for a strategic drone strike."

a reply to: YouSir

Seriously? Iraq Sadaam killed nearly 2 million people while he was in power not to mention invaded his neighbors. The reason he was removed was when his troops started taking over other countries and at the time threatened to march to Saudi Arabia. His troops couldn't take it so he just launched missiles at them. There was good reasons to invade Iraq. As for Afghanistan never really agreed with the whole go after terrorists hiding there when just as many were in pakistan.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Rolicia

Well if Russia keep on shelling hospitals ile keep bringing it up.

Psychiatric hospitals as well now.

There is no scenario where shelling hospital's and civilians in this day of age is ok and anyone who thinks so is a complete and utter sicko.

The only slippery slope i see is Russia's avenue to their own demise.

If you really believe the only aims and goals of "Social media" is to bring people together then you are sadly mistaken.

As to divide and conquer well that's the colour of humanities day all and every week of the year.

lol they're not shelling anything. Man I thought people on this site would do a lot better wading through times of muddy waters. Especially when things get this muddy, but nope. The same people I thought were critical thinkers are now displaying ukraine flags and their hatred for putin without realizing wtf is actually going LOL

a reply to: midicon

The west as you put it did not use nukes. They used an atomic bomb major difference. As for nukes use
The United States will not use or threaten to use nuclear
weapons against non-nuclear weapons states.
So nuking Iraq was never an option.