Pro-Covid Vaccine Youtuber Doctor John Cambell Wants To Know Why The Media Is Silent On Ivermectin

The semi-famous Dr. John Cambell who attempts to objectively review all studies and government data related to the covid crisis recently created a video about a new Ivermectin study. He admits it's a huge scandal and "information is being deliberately suppressed." The study shows a 70% reduction in mortality when using a very low dose of ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg). He also shows the probability that it's incorrect is 1 in 10,000.

It seems as though Youtube is allowing the doctors analysis of the Ivermectin study stay up for now, although months ago this would have been immediately deleted.



STUDY

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The semi-famous Dr. John Cambell who attempts to objectively review all studies and government data related to the covid crisis recently created a video about a new Ivermectin study. He admits it's a huge scandal and "information is being deliberately suppressed." The study shows a 70% reduction in mortality when using a very low dose of ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg). He also shows the probability that it's incorrect is 1 in 10,000.

It seems as though Youtube is allowing the doctors analysis of the Ivermectin study stay up for now, although months ago this would have been immediately deleted.

Very good news, but you have no point in your OP. I think one of the big issues was that Trump brought it forward based on some initial observations and the left turn it into a circus with the old horse med statements etc.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The semi-famous Dr. John Cambell who attempts to objectively review all studies and government data related to the covid crisis recently created a video about a new Ivermectin study. He admits it's a huge scandal and "information is being deliberately suppressed." The study shows a 70% reduction in mortality when using a very low dose of ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg). He also shows the probability that it's incorrect is 1 in 10,000.

It seems as though Youtube is allowing the doctors analysis of the Ivermectin study stay up for now, although months ago this would have been immediately deleted.

Very good news, but you have no point in your OP. I think one of the big issues was that Trump brought it forward based on some initial observations and the left turn it into a circus with the old horse med statements etc.

No point? It's actually becoming mainstream knowledge now and not immediately being removed from YouTube. That's a pretty big deal.

a reply to: Xtrozero
When did Trump bring it forward (based on some initial observations)?

Finally at long last he wakes up and gets it. Took him bloody long enough though! Wondering how long it will be before he is nobbled

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The semi-famous Dr. John Cambell who attempts to objectively review all studies and government data related to the covid crisis recently created a video about a new Ivermectin study. He admits it's a huge scandal and "information is being deliberately suppressed." The study shows a 70% reduction in mortality when using a very low dose of ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg). He also shows the probability that it's incorrect is 1 in 10,000.

It seems as though Youtube is allowing the doctors analysis of the Ivermectin study stay up for now, although months ago this would have been immediately deleted.

STUDY

This study is not of itself a clinical trial (the FDA approved method for establishing the efficacy of ivermectin for use against COVID-19), but is a meta-analysis of database data.

Because the study was not a clinical trial, but was limited to only the details stored in the database for each case, assumptions would have been made about medical conditions that may have been contributory to outcomes. For instance, the severity and disease load over time in the patients would not have been recorded, nor were the same, or similar procedures, or dosages, uniformly adhered to, for all cases. And we know that not everyone has COVID-19 with exactly the same symptoms or severity.

Also, of the 41,608 patients identified as having COVID-19, only 2.58% were given ivermectin, while 97.42% were given remdesivir. Hardly an equitable comparison there.

This type of meta-analysis study was heavily championed by the big tobacco promoters who were trying to convince the public that smoking was not a significant cause of cancer and, while it may be useful in promoting proper clinical trials be done, is of itself insufficiently robust enough to change any official determination on the clinical usefulness of ivermectin against COVID-19.

There are also clinical counter-studies that indicate that ivermectin is almost useless against COVID-19.

a reply to: Xtrozero

It didn't help that people were procuring veterinarian-grade ivermectin (actual horse medicine) and over-dosing themselves.

originally posted by: joejack1949
a reply to: Xtrozero

It didn't help that people were procuring veterinarian-grade ivermectin (actual horse medicine) and over-dosing themselves.

Actually it did help since it's the same exact drug and the same dose if you know how to dose it. The over dose claims are a ridiculous mainstream media stunt. Holding back ivermectin as early treatment did kill millions though.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Nobody should be sucking back horse medicine. There were several reports of ivermectin toxicity because people have no idea how to dose themselves properly. The literature doesn't seem to be settled on the effectiveness either. But I guess evidence isn't needed in this clown world!

the Media was instructed to kill the knowledge of the drug that kills internal 'parasites... and to infer that the reason was the drug that kills parasites was all money oriented, 'Jabs @ $40 a pop, paid by govt' to vaxxine producers

the real connection with ivermectin & COVID is that the cadre of mega-pharma plotters did not want a effective parasite killer drug, destroying the effects of the vaxxine in building a proprietary-parasite in the voluntary vaccine taker...


--out of sight out of mind-- was the tactic agreed upon by the covid-vaxxine Cult of Eugenics' hiding in the mega-pharma industry

originally posted by: joejack1949
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Nobody should be sucking back horse medicine. There were several reports of ivermectin toxicity because people have no idea how to dose themselves properly. The literature doesn't seem to be settled on the effectiveness either. But I guess evidence isn't needed in this clown world!

Yes, there's no evidence..

EVIDENCE

Probability of an equal or greater percentage of positive results from an ineffective treatment

All studies: 1 in 169 billion


So you're sayin' there's a chance?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

As chronaut mentioned earlier, there is both favorable and unfavorable data demonstrating the effectiveness of the drug, hence the need for better quality clinical trials that nobody is going to pay for because ivermectin is a generic drug.

If you want a good rabbithole, look into the deaths of Barry Sherman and his wife...

edit because i actually clicked your link - where was that meta analysis published?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

When did Trump bring it forward (based on some initial observations)?

Anything remotely related was all mixed together and attacked as part of the same bucket and used against Trump and anyone that may have thought they could work. So Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were both used in the same breath many times in attacking anything not FDA approved.

originally posted by: joejack1949

It didn't help that people were procuring veterinarian-grade ivermectin (actual horse medicine) and over-dosing themselves.

So looking now into it all it seems the vast majority of this story was fabricated and the main liberal news/media ran with it like the top story of the year. It started from one person saying...

"The ERs are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated,"

The media then ran this a million times over...

"Gunshot victims left waiting as horse dewormer overdoses overwhelm Oklahoma hospitals, doctor says."

No one in the media bothered to check and not only were the hospitals not backed up, but the typical response from the hospitals in that area was they have treated no one...

Another error of gross negligence was a media report that 70% of people calling the poison hot line was due to horse dewormer overdoses, and the reality was less than 2% of people calling the hot line asked about ivermectin and were not overdosing on it.

a reply to: Xtrozero

I can't speak to the media as I haven't consumed it - I do recall members here saying that they bought vet grade paste. There is a publication in a journal from Oregon that does describe something like 24 cases of acute toxicity from ivermectin in the month of August, up from 0.25 cases per month on average. It was published in a medical journal, but I can't say if that was peer reviewed.

Anyway, you don't need to convince me - it would be great if nobody actually consumed the horse paste version of the stuff, but in this day and age, the story is more probable than it should be...

originally posted by: joejack1949
a reply to: Xtrozero

I can't speak to the media as I haven't consumed it - I do recall members here saying that they bought vet grade paste. There is a publication in a journal from Oregon that does describe something like 24 cases of acute toxicity from ivermectin in the month of August, up from 0.25 cases per month on average. It was published in a medical journal, but I can't say if that was peer reviewed.

Anyway, you don't need to convince me - it would be great if nobody actually consumed the horse paste version of the stuff, but in this day and age, the story is more probable than it should be...

You're so worried about hypothetical horse paste stories which are bs, and not so much about the DMED data or ant of the data showing the mrna drugs are causing a sh# load of side effects and deaths.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Better question is why people trust big pharma .

Big pharma makes ivermectin.

originally posted by: joejack1949

Anyway, you don't need to convince me - it would be great if nobody actually consumed the horse paste version of the stuff, but in this day and age, the story is more probable than it should be...

Well if anyone is using the full dose of horse paste thinking it is the same for humans without spending 30 seconds and looking it up, they deserve what they get. In any case I bet the number of people doing this is extremely small since about 99%+ of the population wouldn't have a clue to where to even get it. So ranchers is about the only group to really have access to it.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

You're so worried about hypothetical horse paste stories which are bs, and not so much about the DMED data or ant of the data showing the mrna drugs are causing a sh# load of side effects and deaths.

Well it seems as with the horse paste the DMED data was incorrect too as I posted here I think yesterday. Seems everyone likes to scandalized something or other.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

How do you know what I'm worried about? Just because I'm trying to clarify facts doesn't speak to my personal concerns. People LOVE to take Dr. John's analysis and then create ridiculous spins on it. The average layman does not have the knowledge or ability to interpret most of these medical studies. Like people thinking that pfizer's risk analysis shows that

DMED data or ant of the data showing the mrna drugs are causing a sh# load of side effects and deaths.