a reply to:
guidedbyblake
The term "Deep State" is now bandied about quite cavalierly, but I think very few have any grasp of how it works in practice.
I suppose that "G" could also allude to the Freemason concept of God. I don't know if JFK or JFK Jr had any Freemason ties.
Ian Fitzgerald's
The Deep State gives a broad overview of many (not all) of its tendrils, but is still an extremely superficial treatment. It
doesn't discuss the Federal Reserve and only mentions J.P. Morgan in passing (as an example of how his banking strategies enabled America's "Game of
Monopoly").
In essence, the Deep State encompasses all facets of American society, from traditional heavy industry, transportation, communication, energy,
agriculture, medical, pharmaceutical, insurance, utilities, government agencies, military-industrial complex, banking, finance/Wall Street, retail
(Wal-mart, etc.), high-tech (MicroSoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, Facebook), legal system, educational system, criminal networks, and so on and so
forth.
Note: The first four companies of the high-tech sector create the acronym MAGA (lol).
The Deep State is almost synonymous with America. But, what ties it all together? It used to be the royal family that managed to orchestrate the
economies of countries and (arguably) the entire world. We aren't that far removed from that time period, and some would say we aren't removed from
it period. I do feel that the rise of America to the status of "Super Power" resulted in a fundamental shift in the DS away from direct royal
control. However, families with close ties to royalty ensured continuity of the DS during that transition. The present NWO movement certainly
represents some type of "next-gen" DS transition.
The Kennedy family had ties to the DS, and the reforms of JFK seem to represent an attempt at change of the DS more-or-less from within rather than
from without. To some extent, I think the same applies to Trump, who has the swagger of an elitist and reportedly has claims of ties to royalty in
his "pedigree". Regardless, when Trump picked his initial cabinet it was clear he had to patronize certain elements of the DS, such as through Rex
Tillerman and Steve Bannon. Maybe he thought those guys were going to be insider reformers like himself?
We now know what we are dealing with, but we don't really know who we are dealing with.
It was never my intention to become a historian of the DS. It was simply the result of researching an ancient world dominated by the royal family in
its totalitarianism. I'm not an expert on the modern Deep State by any means. It just seems obvious, based upon my study (of what has come before
and how we got to where we are) that "we the (poor) people" have no chance in this fight, if it is indeed even such a contest. The virus of the DS is
running its course. Maybe Snowden and Assange and Q have tried to vaccinate us against it, but the vaccine is about as effective as the one for
Covid. Those of us that now have some insight into the DS wrestling match can really only sit back as observers of "The Big Show".
Activism is a mixed bag at best. Often it causes more harm than good. Some problems can only be solved indirectly. Some problems simply just go
away over time and with cultural change (that is going to happen anyway due to advances in technology or whatever). The purest form of activism is
not coordinated. It is humans being human.
The DS is building their own Arks too, ya know?