Queen Of England Prescribed Ivermectin To Treat Covid-19

originally posted by: nolabel
a reply to: just4fun

The queen took ivermectin and let all of your family members die saying it was bad

Please supply some sort of proof, any proof, to your statement.
Won't hold my breath, because your outright lie does not stand up!

Even if the queen didnt take it which im 100% sure if she had a bad case they would have tried it on her

We should still all be pissed at every authority for not giving us the chance especially now when it has been proven to work.

They literally let our friends and family members die knowing they had the cure.

a reply to: just4fun

You being "100% sure" doesn't cut it.

I'm 100% sure you're full of it

So there you go.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: just4fun

You being "100% sure" doesn't cut it.

I'm 100% sure you're full of it

So there you go.

She took it

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: just4fun

You being "100% sure" doesn't cut it.

I'm 100% sure you're full of it

So there you go.

I know you would rather people die than admit it works .

But it does work

a reply to: just4fun

Prove it, for goodness' sakes? You saying it don't make it so.

a reply to: just4fun

Come on, I'm still waiting for you to provide some proof other than what you think.
Give us some solid proof that it works and Her Majesty has been treated with it.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: just4fun

Prove it, for goodness' sakes? You saying it don't make it so.

Prove she didnt

There is more proof she did than there is she ddnt

I can't believe she didn't get the vaccine. Ugh I'm so mad does she not trust science!

originally posted by: AndyMayhew
The motto of ATS used to be "Deny Ignorance". Now it seems to be "Spread Disinformation"

Anyway, not only does no-one know what, if any, medication the Queen is taking (other than her and her doctor), she certainly wouldn't be taking snake oil proven to have no benefit whatsoever.

Next time, at least try and come up with a more convincing lie. Something like "UK buys 1,000 babies from US orphanage in order to provide the Queen with the blood of 21 virgins a day to cure Covid"

Have to agree, this website has literally gone to the dogs, or may I say Russian and political disinformation? Guess “ deny ignorance” doesn’t make money, while disinformation apparently does.

Still wondering if some of the posters are getting paid by Russia to spread disinformation. Really! Used to check this website daily, now more like once a week going on to once a month if all you get are conservative misinformation.

First, no one who is professional is going to share intimate medical patient information. That stuff just doesn’t happen. Especially someone such as…. Say a queen. Second, after 30 years in the medical profession I’ve met some really good physicians and a very few that maybe were not, but I have never met one who didn’t do their best to follow the research.

Fake story, fake medication. “Deny ignorance” has turned onto “create ignorance.”

Denny

Is the Queen Dead?

A rumor claiming that Queen Elizabeth II had died went viral on social media on Tuesday night, but a parliamentary official said there was no truth to the report. The monarch is currently recovering from COVID-19.

The rumors emerged on Tuesday night when Hollywood Unlocked, a celebrity news outlet with a large following on Instagram and YouTube, reported that the monarch had been found dead.
bnonews.com...

www.usatoday.com...

Never Cared much for the Queen.

originally posted by: DaCook

originally posted by: AndyMayhew
The motto of ATS used to be "Deny Ignorance". Now it seems to be "Spread Disinformation"

Anyway, not only does no-one know what, if any, medication the Queen is taking (other than her and her doctor), she certainly wouldn't be taking snake oil proven to have no benefit whatsoever.

Next time, at least try and come up with a more convincing lie. Something like "UK buys 1,000 babies from US orphanage in order to provide the Queen with the blood of 21 virgins a day to cure Covid"

Have to agree, this website has literally gone to the dogs, or may I say Russian and political disinformation? Guess “ deny ignorance” doesn’t make money, while disinformation apparently does.

Still wondering if some of the posters are getting paid by Russia to spread disinformation. Really! Used to check this website daily, now more like once a week going on to once a month if all you get are conservative misinformation.

First, no one who is professional is going to share intimate medical patient information. That stuff just doesn’t happen. Especially someone such as…. Say a queen. Second, after 30 years in the medical profession I’ve met some really good physicians and a very few that maybe were not, but I have never met one who didn’t do their best to follow the research.

Fake story, fake medication. “Deny ignorance” has turned onto “create ignorance.”

Denny

I get paid by the Russians.

a reply to: AndyMayhew

Pretty much every study I have seen that was conducted in an unbiased way has shown Ivermectin is very effective against Covid illness, reducing hospitalizations, number of days hospitalized, and seriousness of illness.

With that said, no one knows what the Queen is taking.

originally posted by: just4fun

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: just4fun

Prove it, for goodness' sakes? You saying it don't make it so.

Prove she didnt

There is more proof she did than there is she ddnt

There is zero proof she did I have seen, source the proof?

originally posted by: ADUB77
I can't believe she didn't get the vaccine. Ugh I'm so mad does she not trust science!

She is vaccinated I believe.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: AndyMayhew

Pretty much every study I have seen that was conducted in an unbiased way has shown Ivermectin is very effective against Covid illness, reducing hospitalizations, number of days hospitalized, and seriousness of illness.

With that said, no one knows what the Queen is taking.

Nothing has ever come across my desk to say that it does more than relieve symptoms of moderate covid. It certainly doesn't act as a prophylactic agent, or reduce your chances of needing critical care.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: just4fun

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: just4fun

Prove it, for goodness' sakes? You saying it don't make it so.

Prove she didnt

There is more proof she did than there is she ddnt

There is zero proof she did I have seen, source the proof?

Given that it's not used in the UK, the odds are that she did not.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Must be true if you believe it.

Well only in your own nut but hey'ho if it suits the old doom porn purpose.

You will spread it on anyone's toast or so it seems.

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: network dude

I remember back when this site would welcome a chance to dig into a conspiracy, today, it's either all or nothing, no research needed, just propoganda and BS.

Ivermetcin has been done to the nth degree here on ATS....there's a mountain of threads on its use as a Covid cure etc.

People tend to start from a pre-determined viewpoint and refuse to budge either way regardless of evidence, or the lack of it, presented.
That is the tragedy of what ATS has become.

no, it's not about pushing ivermectin as a wonder drug.

But that is EXACTLY what the OP was pushing supported by the ridiculous video he posted.

People can talk about the effectiveness etc of Ivermectin for Covid treatment till the cows come home but none of it will alter the FACT that the OP has been proven wrong.
And that is exactly what has always happened on ATS and long may it continue.

But this is about how ivermectin's ability to help with symptoms of Covid have been suppressed for political reasons.

As I said before, that has been discussed time and time again and I for one have no desire to engage in a discussion where at least 99% of the participants, on all sides, have entrenched locked in views and point blank refuse to even consider alternative viewpoints.

Obviously others are free to choose to do whatever they please.👍

the reason it's worthy of discussion is that there is a whole lot of evidence that it works against Covid. There is a huge pushback on it from "official sources", yet others have claimed it works and helps. Who would benefit and who would be damaged by it's ability to shorten the length of covid or it's severity? The vaccine companies. If a suitable drug existed to treat this, then the EUA's wouldn't have been approved. Does that sound like a conspiracy? It sure does to me. So I choose to leave it open to investigation and I'm not willing to adopt the mainstream mentality on it just yet. No, I'm not screaming from the Heavens that it's the answer to all things Covid, just that there may be some there, there.

a reply to: network dude

There is a huge pushback on it from "official sources", 

I can understand this in the US because of trump, but surely others countries would be openly using it if it really were effective?

They tried it in India and Brazil and quickly stopped using it. Why would the stop using something that helped in their countries because of American politics?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: network dude

There is a huge pushback on it from "official sources", 

I can understand this in the US because of trump, but surely others countries would be openly using it if it really were effective?

They tried it in India and Brazil and quickly stopped using it. Why would the stop using something that helped in their countries because of American politics?

because it's not "American" politics, it's WORLD politics. The Vaccines are global, not just a US thing. The Emergency Use Authorization for a brand new drug, largely untested (many of them) is a strong deterrent to having anything that may work. I'm not saying it works, I'm saying it MAY work, and rather than passing studies that say "doesn't appear to help", we should be making sure the studies are conclusive. But the same one's doing the studies are benefitting from the vaccines. So that opens another box to look in.

It's a conspiracy, it should be looked at like that.