It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes, yes they do.
People make things up when they don't know or understand things.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte
Yes, yes they do.
People make things up when they don't know or understand things.
But they usually make those things up from a point of view, of the things, they have seen. A core truth.
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte
Yes, yes they do.
People make things up when they don't know or understand things.
But they usually make those things up from a point of view, of the things, they have seen. A core truth.
That's right, which is why An is the sky, Enlili is the wind, Thor is the thunder, Zeus is the lightning,
So what?
Like I said - things they don't understand.
Harte
originally posted by: Harte
The fact is, the Anunnaki are just another collection of gods in just another society - no different that the Greek myths, Norse myths, Hindu myths, or any other cultures' myths about their various pantheons.
People make things up when they don't know or understand things.
Harte
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Harte
Yes, yes they do.
People make things up when they don't know or understand things.
But they usually make those things up from a point of view, of the things, they have seen. A core truth.
That's right, which is why An is the sky, Enlili is the wind, Thor is the thunder, Zeus is the lightning,
So what?
Like I said - things they don't understand.
Harte
Freemasons have been involved since the beginnings of NASA. If there was a group who could pull of a great hoax to fool nearly the entire planet, it would be possible through the Freemasons.
By declaring that Scottish Right Freemasons planted a flag on the moon the Freemasons gained many members in their secret society, whether they actually went or not.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Now of those that think building a space craft that size is impossible, buckle your seat belt.
At this point we have only a frame, so, how do we create the crust? You mine the toughest materials available, and in this particular case, titanium rich ore. (Titania (moon), just a coincidence)
You move your frame close to the sun, and as we all know, its hot, sprinkle the ore around the frame evenly, maybe in a few layers. You let the sun melt the ore which will then adhere to your frame. Rotate, repeat until you have a perfect sphere. Now this would work because the ore is being melted in a vacuum so the titanium will not be compromised
Then you would need to have openings to allow vacuum in. Lets call them, "Lunar Pits".
There probably would be two types. The Plumbing one, for vacuum, would have some sort of door that could be opened and closed that leads to the vast interior. The other type would allow access to the honeycombed labyrinth. This one might also have a door system.
As for the water leaving plumbing it might have instead of just a hole, might have a spire, protuberance, or proboscis, that is either permanently mounted to the exterior, or, capable of being extended out of the crust itself, then retracted.
As far as if this actually happened, well, who really knows. But seeing how our own planet is 4.5-5 billion years old, the window of opportunity is quite large. Titanium is extremely tough, and very light, very close to the weight of aluminum. Its melting temp is 3,034 °F. Does the sun get that hot?? And, it is very difficult, to drill into.
So the next time you look up at that big white ball (Titanium White Composition: Titanium Dioxide PW6 www.earthpigments.com... ) in the night sky, keep telling yourself its not possible, its not possible. You might even start to believe it.
All the above is imaginary. There is no evidence to support any of this. But if I were to create a planetoid this size, I might consider this a basic blue print.
The Sky, isn't the limit.
The big problem with all of this is the Moon's mass. It has to have a lot of mass in order to create the tides.
For it to be hollow, but still have the mass we observe, the interior would have to contain a ball of incredibly dense material that gives it the expected average density, despite containing a lot of empty space.
I don't see how the project would pay for itself economically? There's nothing on Earth valuable enough to be worth creating a hollow object of that size just to watch it.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: bloodymarvelous
The big problem with all of this is the Moon's mass. It has to have a lot of mass in order to create the tides.
For it to be hollow, but still have the mass we observe, the interior would have to contain a ball of incredibly dense material that gives it the expected average density, despite containing a lot of empty space.
I don't see how the project would pay for itself economically? There's nothing on Earth valuable enough to be worth creating a hollow object of that size just to watch it.
The only reason I posted that was to allow the possibility of a craft being created that large. I would also agree there are components I have left out due to ignorance. You are free to take the concept further if you will.
The morals and values, and the reasons why it was created can not be substituted with our morals, values. The race, species that might have created it could have at its core instinctive domination and expansion. And we may not see "Profit" in the same light, or understand their "Mission". Though we might get a hint at it because of the way we were, and are treated.
I don't believe it was originally created in our Solar System. I do believe it was filled with water, to Terraform a target planet. Maybe even like a farmer clearing for a new vegetable garden, but on a far grander scale. And yes. I believe Earth was Terraformed, originally, and then again starting some 70 million years ago.
At any rate, I don't think we can compare our ideology, with theirs...
On the other hand, if there were some form of creatures living in that water, then you wouldn't want to freeze it, because it would kill them.
The pool sits inside a big, windowless building in Houston, on the grounds of NASA’s Johnson Space Center. It is about 40 feet deep, and holds enough water to fill several Olympic-size pools. Beneath the surface, shrouded in the bluish tint of the water, is a replica of the International Space Station.
So maybe another possibility would be if the "hollow moon" were to be still full of water? Perhaps for some life form that prefers to live in water?
It would ring full or empty. If it were full of water the "Ring" would be suppressed because the water itself would act like a shock absorber. Ringing for 45 min tells me, its empty of water. It may have residual amounts left in it but not a full load.
If it were full of water, I think it would still ring, wouldn't it? In fact if the interior were a vacuum, it would not only ring, but it would take a really long time to stop ringing, because the vibration wouldn't be encountering much friction.
Maybe Earth is their hostage. Humans are considered "innocent", since we've never interacted with the rest of the intergalactic community.
But blowing up the Annanukis' refuge would harm Earth. ?
Just brainstorming reasons here, though.
originally posted by: [post=26529618]All Seeing Eye
The Moon is not tidal locked to the crust of our planet. It is tidal locked to the core of this planet, which in turn is tidal locked to our Sun. This is why the crust can spin freely and at the same time, the moon only shows one side to us.
Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the solar system combined. Our solar system’s barycenter constantly changes position. Its position depends on where the planets are in their orbits. The solar system's barycenter can range from being near the center of the sun to being outside the surface of the sun. As the sun orbits this moving barycenter, it wobbles around.
originally posted by: Hanslune
originally posted by: [post=26529618]All Seeing Eye
The Moon is not tidal locked to the crust of our planet. It is tidal locked to the core of this planet, which in turn is tidal locked to our Sun. This is why the crust can spin freely and at the same time, the moon only shows one side to us.
We aren't tidal locked to our Sun we actual orbit a point within the sun called the barycenter which varies from being near the core to outside the far edge of the star.
Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the solar system combined. Our solar system’s barycenter constantly changes position. Its position depends on where the planets are in their orbits. The solar system's barycenter can range from being near the center of the sun to being outside the surface of the sun. As the sun orbits this moving barycenter, it wobbles around.
spaceplace.nasa.gov...
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
originally posted by: Hanslune
originally posted by: [post=26529618]All Seeing Eye
The Moon is not tidal locked to the crust of our planet. It is tidal locked to the core of this planet, which in turn is tidal locked to our Sun. This is why the crust can spin freely and at the same time, the moon only shows one side to us.
We aren't tidal locked to our Sun we actual orbit a point within the sun called the barycenter which varies from being near the core to outside the far edge of the star.
Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the solar system combined. Our solar system’s barycenter constantly changes position. Its position depends on where the planets are in their orbits. The solar system's barycenter can range from being near the center of the sun to being outside the surface of the sun. As the sun orbits this moving barycenter, it wobbles around.
spaceplace.nasa.gov...
No argument from me about the point our core is locked to the sun. Call it what you will. And, our core is still locked to that point of the sun. And the moon is locked to our core, which spins freely from the crust. Its the only way the moon can face us without rotating at the speed of the crust.
Thanks for your thoughtfulness and reply.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
And, our core is still locked to that point of the sun. And the moon is locked to our core, which spins freely from the crust. Its the only way the moon can face us without rotating at the speed of the crust.
originally posted by: GrandSchemeOfThings
So are the oceans being "destroyed" to their liking, under their direction maybe?
You know acidification, pollution, dying off of life, etc?
The octopus is an exceptional organism with an extremely complex brain and cognitive abilities that are unique among invertebrates. So much so that in some ways it has more in common with vertebrates than with invertebrates.
The research shows that the same "jumping genes" are active both in the human brain and in the brain of two species, Octopus vulgaris, the common octopus, and Octopus bimaculoides, the Californian octopus. This discovery could help us understand the secret of the intelligence of these fascinating organisms.
Sequencing the human genome revealed as early as 2001 that over 45% of it is composed of sequences called transposons, so-called "jumping genes" that, through molecular copy-and-paste or cut-and-paste mechanisms, can "move" from one point to another of an individual's genome, shuffling or duplicating. In most cases, these mobile elements remain silent: they have no visible effects and have lost their ability to move. Some are inactive because they have, over generations, accumulated mutations; others are intact, but blocked by cellular defense mechanisms. From an evolutionary point of view, even these fragments and broken copies of transposons can still be useful, as "raw matter" that evolution can sculpt.
Among these mobile elements, the most relevant are those belonging to the so-called LINE (Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements) family, found in a hundred copies in the human genome and still potentially active. It has been traditionally thought that LINEs' activity was just a vestige of the past, a remnant of the evolutionary processes that involved these mobile elements, but in recent years new evidence emerged showing that their activity is finely regulated in the brain. There are many scientists who believe that LINE transposons are associated with cognitive abilities such as learning and memory: they are particularly active in the hippocampus, the most important structure of our brain for the neural control of learning processes.
he octopus' genome, like ours, is rich in "jumping genes," most of which are inactive. Focusing on the transposons still capable of copy-and-paste, the researchers identified an element of the LINE family in parts of the brain crucial for the cognitive abilities of these animals.
Scuba Ventures in Kavieng, Papua New Guinea, shows one of the rarest animal sightings in the world involving a Chirodectes maculatus, an incredibly rare genus of box jellyfish which had only been sighted once before.