300 million year old pot found in coal

Just found this... i thought it would be interesting to post on our forum

Apparently it takes a good 300 million years to create coal beneath the earth... with all the factors and pressure required, how does one explain how an iron pot managed to get embedded in this coal in Russia?

Pictures of the imprint it left when it was extracted are shown... it looks like some sort of melting pot for metal due to the sides having what seems to be spouts... or at least thats what i would probably use it for

could it really be over 300 million years old? And IF so, what does that mean for our species?

Or who or what used it 300 million years ago?

Just like they've found millions of years old cowboy hats.

a reply to: Akragon
First thing that comes to mind is a lead melting pot...for making bullets.

It's obviously evidence of Russian time travel technology. The real question is when was the iron pot sent from in the future.

a reply to: Akragon

Could it be? No. Do we have any great evidence it is? No.

a reply to: Akragon

Super interesting! Maybe the dating system is off, or our theory of how coal is formed is flawed.

There was an ancient hammer found in coal and a petrified tree trunk standing upright through a coal vein found a few years back.

My grandma had a pice of petrified wood with the imprint of a seashell in it.

Odd stuff.

ETA sorry the hammer was in stone.

en.wikipedia.org...

Here is the tree and coal.

pygs.lyellcollection.org...

Not where I thought this thread was going, but still pretty cool, dude

a reply to: Akragon

could it really be over 300 million years old? And IF so, what does that mean for our species?

It means what all of us already know to be true.

Intelligent Life has been on Earth for Millions of Years, Religion is Bull# and we all come from Aliens.

originally posted by: Mandroid7
Not where I thought this thread was going, but still pretty cool, dude

might have been used to smoke ancient pot.... who knows lol

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Akragon

Could it be? No. Do we have any great evidence it is? No.

Well according to the time line it takes to make coal... Yes it could be...

How it got there... no idea...

But personally i believe there has been sentient life on this planet for far longer then they want us to believe...

300 million year old pot found in coal,
Cheech later visited the archeological site asking if anyone had perhaps found a 300 million year old pipe laying around.
He also asked the lead archeologist on the dig site for a lighter, as he discovered his was empty.

Edit: Removed reference of the politician who decidedly did inhale with a more apolitical reference to a 80's and 90's stoned Mexican Born in East LA. Thank you for reading my edit.


Edit II: Just wanted to add an addendumb. I just had to be the one to tell this joke. I mean, we were all thinking it. Maybe not the same fictitious characters, I would accept Willie Nelson and Snoop Dog as well, but somebody had to tell this joke is all I'm sayin.

I'v always thought this is truly why they want an end to fossil fuels like coal and shut down coal mining. They don't want us to find what is down there when these ancient coal forests were formed. These artifacts could change history.

a reply to: TamtammyMacx

And in the past 100 years, especially now when it's easier to verify these finds they no longer occur, interesting.

a reply to: Akragon

Think of what we have done in the past few hundred years. Now think what we would do with 300 million.

a reply to: Akragon
I love a good oopart.

It makes some people twist themselves into knots to explain it away.

a reply to: Akragon

A very well known oopart and one of very many of them and there have been a great many such finds over the years.

They don't fit the accepted paradigm that is pushed and indoctrinated into people from there childhood up so you can see how some take it as a joke without realizing that the joke is upon them, literally.

Mystery history 1 and 2 are very enjoyable you tube channels and put forward some compelling ideas but I have spotted a few (very few niggling) errors in some of his videos on occasion so always look for other sources to corroborate but that is a real find.

I read about many of these long before the internet was readily available, things like gold chains found embedded in solid blocks of coal in the 1800's in England and axe, coins and other oddities found beneath rocks in Scotland, a fossilized (petrified) quarryman's board and partially worked marble in a quarry in France which was discovered I think the 18 or 17 hundreds when they were quarrying the marble face down and came to the already worked face deep down were it could not have been quarried.

The problem with these is that they threaten some peoples supposedly rational view of reality, they throw out there belief system and that is something that will make then fight against it.

Remember they have replaced there belief in God with a belief in Science and made it there religion with cherished ideas such as evolution regarded by them as fact.

There are two conclusions from such finds or a third in fact.

One, all dating is wrong and the great flood is real.

Two, there have been other races of man (or man like races on the earth) or mankind is far older than we currently believe.

Or

Three, both of the above.


The fourth I did not mention is fakery, it is worth noting that there was a motive for this in the days of freak shows and that some would still do so today as we see with faked videos of UFO's on youtube for example but in this instance I tend to fully believe this is a real find and a real artefact.

a reply to: LABTECH767

Or coal doesnt take that long to form. I've read a theory saying that crude oil is being generated too. That we can never burn it all

a reply to: Klassified

In this case hoax, no need to explain anything when it can't be verified it's real.

a reply to: Akragon

Perhaps it was embedded in already formed coal, like being buried in an old coal pit or collapsed mine when the miners quit?

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Klassified

In this case hoax, no need to explain anything when it can't be verified it's real.

Unless we can prove it is or is not a genuine artifact found embedded in coal, it would seem to me the default answer should be we don't know, or at most, known science says it is very unlikely. Calling it a hoax without being able to prove the allegation is no better than believing it's real just because someone on the internet said so. Both stances are akin to confirmation bias.