It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is undeniable that mass vaccination will only drive the virus to fully exploit its evolutionary capacity, including – if needed – its ability to use alternate receptor domains on permissive cells. The fitness cost that may come with such a dramatic mutation is likely to be rewarded with enhanced pathogenicity. I am truly afraid that these dynamics will eventually allow for the natural selection of individuals with uncompromised innate immunity while eliminating those without it. While such natural selection would lead to an eradication of SARS-CoV-2 as innate immunity sterilizes the virus and blocks transmission, the consequences would be unimaginable – the price paid for ending the pandemic by virus eradication is not comparable to the one paid for by generating herd immunity and allowing the virus to enter an endemic state. Those who are enforcing mass vaccination are opting for the former instead of the latter, an act that will be remembered as the deadliest sin ever.
Now, according to confidential documents authored by Pfizer that it wanted to deperately keep secret, the company hasn’t just caused damage to the public purse, it appears it has also caused damage to the publics health, because Pfizer admit that Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is a a very real theoretical risk for its Covid-19 vaccine.
The confidential document titled ‘5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021‘, was submitted by Pfizer-BioNTech as part of its Biological License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA)
Table 5, found on page 11 of the document shows an ‘Important Potential Risk’, and that risk is listed as ‘Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Reporatory Disease (VAERD)’.
‘an expected rate of VAED is difficult to establish so a meaningful observed / expected analysis cannot be conducted at this point based on available data. The feasibility of conducting such an analysis will be re-evaluated on an ongoing basis as data on the virus grows and the vaccine safety data continues to accrue’.
In the UK the Pfizer jab was granted emergency use authorisation on the 8th Dec 20, and the first injection was administered the following day. By April 2021, 5 months later, Pfizer was admitting that it did not have a clue if its Covid-19 injections caused VAED, and that they will only know once they have more data.
This confirms in black and white that the general public have been taking part in possibly the largest experiment ever conducted, and it’s an expirement that has made a select few extremely rich.
‘Since the first temporary authorization for emergency supply under Regulation 174 in the UK (01 December 2020) and through 28 February 2021, 138 cases [0.33% of the total PM dataset], reporting 317 potentially relevant events were retrieved.’
According to Pfizer those 138 cases reporting 317 VAED relevant events included –
71 incidents in the UK;
25 incidents in the USA;
14 incidents in Germany;
16 incidents in France, Italy, Mexico & Spain (4 each);
3 incidents in Denmark;
and 9 incidents from 9 different countries
The highest death-rate in the past month among the fully vaccinated was recorded as 14.05 per 100,000 individuals in the week beginning 8th Jan 22.
But at the same time the rate per 100,000 unvaccinated individuals was recorded as being 10.4. Meaning during this week the fully vaccinated were statistically 1.4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.
However, the most concerning figures came in the week beginning 18th Dec 21. During these seven days the death-rate per 100,000 was recorded as 6.55 in the fully vaccinated, but just 1.69 in the unvaccinated. Therefore, during this week the fully vaccinated were statistically 4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the not-vaccinated.
In laymen's terms this means that the vaccine leaves you worse off than having no vaccine at all because the virus can select new mutations to circumvent obsolete antibodies.
originally posted by: joejack1949
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Interesting post... but:
In laymen's terms this means that the vaccine leaves you worse off than having no vaccine at all because the virus can select new mutations to circumvent obsolete antibodies.
That isn't how ADE works.
ADE occurs when viruses have the ability to infect antibody cells. All the antibodies created by the vaccine flow to the site of your viral infection to fight-off the disease; lo and behold, the virus starts attacking the antibodies. As more antibodies flow to the battle, they also get infected and the course of the disease is "enhanced."
Nothing about obsolete antibodies.
originally posted by: Exit89
I got my first jab before I clued in unfortunately. Its funny how everyones question is always, "what could "the government" possibly gain from this"?, like we arent currently in a pandemic caused by china releasing a bio-warfare weapon. They own the WHO the CDC, nobody even says Taiwan its all Taipei. Just to end the rant ill say etcetera. But my point was going to end up at, it is amazing how far apart people are on their understanding of whats happening to us.
a reply to: ColeYounger
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Do you find the leaked documents interesting?
I find it interesting many of the pro mask, pro lockdown, pro school closing, pro covid 6 to 8 shot vaccine posters on ATS are increasingly becoming more and more silent.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
On top of all this, a French court just ruled it essentially a suicide since all of the side effects were clearly posted and it wasn't forced(lol)
Life insurance was not required to pay out death bennies.
Coming to the us soon.
The first results from a UK trial that deliberately exposed people to the coronavirus are finally here. Among other things, the research found that people who caught the infection became symptomatic within two days and remained infectious for longer than a week. None of the volunteers became severely sick, though a few did continue to have trouble smelling things months later.
originally posted by: ColeYounger
There's a large number of people who wouldn't get the jab simply because they don't trust the govt or the pharma companies. They suspected something like this would happen. They were attacked as being "anti-science" right along with the militant anti-vaxxers.
originally posted by: rickymouse
So, the vaxes create vaccine addicts, if you quit getting them...you get sick. Sounds like something a Pharma company would promote after all, they pushed pain pills on people for a long time.
Now will these people will need to take vaccines for everything?
originally posted by: ColeYounger
There's a large number of people who wouldn't get the jab simply because they don't trust the govt or the pharma companies. They suspected something like this would happen. They were attacked as being "anti-science" right along with the militant anti-vaxxers. Looks like their mistrust wasn't unfounded. It still shocks me how many people will just do whatever they're told.
I became highly suspicious early on after seeing two highly-credentialed immunologists say that you cannot develop a vaccine, especially an mRNA vaccine, in such a short time, and declare it safe. The science simply doesn't work that way. They both agreed it takes 3-5 years. Some say 5 is the minimum.
originally posted by: joejack1949
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Interesting post... but:
In laymen's terms this means that the vaccine leaves you worse off than having no vaccine at all because the virus can select new mutations to circumvent obsolete antibodies.
That isn't how ADE works.
ADE occurs when viruses have the ability to infect antibody cells. All the antibodies created by the vaccine flow to the site of your viral infection to fight-off the disease; lo and behold, the virus starts attacking the antibodies. As more antibodies flow to the battle, they also get infected and the course of the disease is "enhanced."
Nothing about obsolete antibodies.