Now You See It Now You Don’t, Now You See It Now You Don’t A Russian UFO

I stabilized some of the footage at the link below. The wiggling to me indicates that it is likely a poorly tracked CG addition: imgur.com...

originally posted by: TheGreatBeyond
I stabilized some of the footage at the link below. The wiggling to me indicates that it is likely a poorly tracked CG addition: imgur.com...

What VID# number and what time #:## - #:## in the vid….did you isolate this portion of the vid to do your “stabilized” version?

See bottom of page 6

👽🛸🍺

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I think it's Vid1, around 2:30.

a reply to: ArMaP

Thx….

Some observations…..



I’m not sure……my skeptical nature says, the object in VID1 was not un-stabilized to begin with.

Once it was “stabilized”……the stabilizing introduced the oscillation. How does that happen?

There is also an slightly opaque sky clouds background blending halo, much larger in the stabilized version than the halo surrounding the object in the Igor VID1

Unless of course The Great Beyond inserted and replaced or overlaid a object 3D masking layer(s) and animated the object to make it oscillate, I believe Photoshop can do this. If that’s correct, I tip my hat to The Great Beyond for hoaxing a stabilization.

From Imgur and cropped for ATS…The Great Beyond effort (stabilization hoax?)


👽🛸🤓

You're welcome to recreate this stabilization. I used DaVinci Resolve, which is available for free. Isolate a portion of the footage, stabilize under the Edit tab with Perspective (to help cancel out the iphone's built-in stabilization warping) and you can see this result. a reply to: Ophiuchus1

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Very cool video. I have no idea if its real or not, but its cool. Two things kind of bother me though.

One is how did he know he needed that piece of glass? Why make that glass if you aren't even sure it will produce any kind of results and how could he know what those results would be?

The other is that he found the stationary object interesting enough to film it from multiple vantage points for 3:30 minutes. Then, when it finally starts to move, he turns the camera away and we never see it again. If I had filmed the thing just being stationary that long from that many vantage points there is no way in hell I would turn away when it finally started doing something.

Still, the poster on the wall in Mulder's office, "I want to believe."

a reply to: TheGreatBeyond

1000 Pardons for not acknowledging your input in a more favorable tone. Your efforts are greatly appreciated. You went the extra mile to actually create an argument against the Igor vid.

I am not yet at a full stance either way on this subject of Igor VID1, but I’m tilting to it not being a hoax.

To recreate a video just as VID1 would be a show stopper….imo.

Mia culpa….I saw no disclaimer adapting your effort to put into an ATS thread. I’ll remember that I should ask first, if available to do so.

👽🛸🍺

originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

If I had filmed the thing just being stationary that long from that many vantage points there is no way in hell I would turn away when it finally started doing something.

Still, the poster on the wall in Mulder's office, "I want to believe."

I agree, I would be recording as much as possible…….

But notice…..like even I would do…..is to see how much closer I can get….wouldn’t you?

I think the two movements are justified….that is to say……..just like the previous two stops to record the object…..on his third stop he records, but with the desire to get closer…he lowers his glass and camera just when the object is moving off unnoticed by him. And so if you continue watching …..he actually believes if he gets closer, he’ll record the object even closer, (as I would think)….by the time he gets to his new 4th vantage point, he starts to record an empty sky in search of the object, that is probably long gone.

👽🛸🥃

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

In video one after the UFO starts to move away at 3:37 he shifts his walking direction and films a business entrance and a crane. Without looking with his magic glass he could only guess where the UFO would be but the business and the crane may be part of the narrative.

a reply to: fromunclexcommunicate

Part of the narrative…..how so. Kindly elaborate.

👽🛸🍸

a reply to: RavenSpeaks

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

This was (by the face) content provided from a you-tube member named obscurelodge.
It seemed plausible to me at the time that the original artist might consider that an unintended narrative clue(to answer McGinty), which is why I didn't comment on it.
Original artist videotaped a crane from several different angles and distances which seems likely to be part of the intended narrative.
We could call Rhein-Ruhr-Krane GmbH & Co. KG and ask if they have seen any UFO's like this in their compartmentalized shipping operations?
But of course the original artist might have intended a much more easily explained narrative which a mod like ARMAP will see as reason to throw this in the HOAX bin.

a reply to: fromunclexcommunicate

In my mind, Igor’s VID1 and VID3, still has not been unequivocally, definitively …..proven to be a Hoax.

I’ll just leave it as…….

👽🛸🍹

OK so everyone seen it begin to move towards the end of the video right before it "disappeared"... Why didn't he leave the glass up in that case? To like, you know... Follow the direction in which it was moving... I call bs 🥲 cool experiment though

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

This video was featured on the TV series "Paranormal Caught on Camera" last year and is repeated constantly.

originally posted by: idusmartias
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

This video was featured on the TV series "Paranormal Caught on Camera" last year and is repeated constantly.

That’s right…..I start my OP by mentioning seeing it on a favorite show of mine….which I didn’t name, but it is Paranormal Caught on Camera 👍🏼😉

The show name is shown in the bottom right screenshot picture of the first picture collage in the OP

👽🛸🍻

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

So the artist that created Video 1 and 3 may have just had the goal of general entertainment like World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. General themes like a UFO being unloaded near a crane or a MacGyver like scheme to give a triangular shaped magic glass embodiment with piezo plasma. If there was something deep state going on, that would have been vetted by the "Paranormal Caught on Camera" audience. The obscurelodge you tube member made a classic masonic split out of the "magic glass" device perhaps inferring there was an alien holding area 210. That is clearly a projection of obscure lodge not the segment you saw on TV. Since you are the OP of this thread not obscurelodge, this remains unsolved.

a reply to: fromunclexcommunicate

Frankly, I don’t know what the word “obscurelodge” or “obscure lodge” means…..used 3 times by you.

I put the word(s) in Google and didn’t find any definitions for your term used.

Let me just say, I saw the a segment of Igor’s video on Paranormal Caught on Camera….one of my favorite tv shows. The screenshot shot I used in the first collage picture in the OP was a screenshot I took while watching it on tv. Essentially, I video recorded what was shown on my tv. I hunted on YouTube for any video that might have been the video being the video segment or part of a perhaps a longer video, since tv shows are known to show short length videos from a larger source video….sometimes known as a snipet …….

Anyway to my amazement…. I did find the video on YouTube, used on the show…..and the is the story behind how I saw something on a tv show, and was able to find the associated YouTube and embedded in the OP. Which I then gave video designations of some other vids being posted, because it was getting confusing when members were pointing out parts of videos, but not referencing which video they are speaking about.

VID3 was submitted by SpaceSpider…..you’ll have to ask him where he got it. If it was in a YouTube general search like I did, then I missed it, and he found it.

Hopefully, I understood your post which sounded like you may have needed to know how VID1 and VID3 came to be posted on the thread. If I didn’t understand your post, like the usage of your word “ obscurelodge”…..then I don’t know the point of what your asking or merely stating.

Here is the screenshot from my tv I used in the OP’s first collage picture bottom right. I simply did due diligence in finding more associated information…..



By the way……your statement…..” magic glass embodiment with piezo plasma.”….has not been satisfactorily proven.

You also stated…..” The obscurelodge you tube member made a classic masonic split out of the "magic glass" device perhaps inferring there was an alien holding area 210.”….. What do you mean? And “YouTube member”….YouTube member from which VID#? (Last, bottom, post on thread page 6)

👽🛸☕️🍩

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Obscurelodge is the Youtube channel from where Acknt got the video posted here, that you reposted here.

Edited to add that it's Vid5.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

“obscurelodge” was the you tube artist that decided the single magic glass was broken from a larger triangular piece.



No relation to the original artist that I know of, and likely just a creative effort inspired by the TV show.
Can't prove there is a holding area 210 for aliens either unless it was shared insight.