Moon Mystery House/ Mystery Hut/ Cube: Secret Buildings in Background of the Photo

a reply to: JamesChessman

Now, because you don't seem able to navigate the Chinese website without someone holding your hand, here are some links for you:

moon.bao.ac.cn.../PCAM/level/2B&year=2019

moon.bao.ac.cn.../PCAM/level/2B&year=2020

moon.bao.ac.cn.../PCAM/level/2B&year=2021

I count roughly 10000 images from the rover there.

Apology accepted.

Any time you want point out specifically what was not true in what I posted is fine.

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: JamesChessman

You need to actually read what I put. The link posted (not by me) works just fine, China's website is not easy to navigate but it releases new images regularly. I never said they had these photos on their site yet, quite the opposite. Your issue is that they aren't photographing and releasing what you want when you want it - your complaint needs to go to them, not me.

...THE LINK DOES NOT WORK.

Here, let me re-post the link, that you are claiming "works just fine."

moon.bao.ac.cn...







Now please enlighten us how this link "works."

You're probably going to play semantics games at this point, but in context of the conversation, the link "works" if it actually links to the 5,000 images dump that you and homie are pretending that you saw, and pretending that the link actually goes to.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Now, because you don't seem able to navigate the Chinese website without someone holding your hand, here are some links for you:

Right, I don't read or speak Chinese.

Neither does HALF THE PLANET.

You know what, the more I talk with you, the more I can see right through you. Some people are just toxic, through and through. I mean, you guys are basically MADE of poison.

Congratulations, you "BUSTED" me for not being able to read Chinese, just like half the planet, wowww.

Go brag to your obnoxious, ignorant friends, and laugh at what a great insult to bust people for not knowing Chinese.





Holy f*ck...

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Wow, you are literally posting MORE LINKS THAT DON'T WORK.

Here's your first link. Not only I still can't tell what I'm even looking at, but there's also not even one image on that webpage, and there's also not a single link that works, on that page.

moon.bao.ac.cn...






Clicking on what look like links, only opens the error message: "Please log in!"

So, now what?







How does someone use your link to actually do anything?

How would someone "log in," are we supposed to purchase a membership, for a website that I can't even tell what I'm looking at?







And then what? Purchase images that I can't see before I buy them? lol





How much does all this cost? i.e. How much spare change do you suggest I give to your linked website? If I give them a few thousand dollars, can I then obtain the ability to spend a few more thousand dollars on buying their images that don't show what they are?

I literally don't know wtf this website even is...

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: JamesChessman

Now, because you don't seem able to navigate the Chinese website without someone holding your hand, here are some links for you:

moon.bao.ac.cn.../PCAM/level/2B&year=2019

moon.bao.ac.cn.../PCAM/level/2B&year=2020

moon.bao.ac.cn.../PCAM/level/2B&year=2021

Predictably, your 2nd and 3rd link are the same garbage: completely non-functional webpages that I can't tell what I'm looking at, except that I know there are no images, and I also know that none of the links do anything besides give me the error message to "Please Log In!" There are also buttons to buy images that I can't see, and which only give the same error message.

So again, we're left with the same questions. How does one log in? Is it from buying a membership or something? By the way, WTF even is this website again?

I count roughly 10000 images from the rover there.

No you don't.

Unless I suppose you're going to argue that you're counting all these unreadable listings as images, except nobody can see them.

So... You're counting "images" that can't be seen. Correct?

In which case they're not actually PUBLISHED, PUBLICLY, which is what we're talking about, and which you seemed to be arguing against.


Sorry partner, but I don't think webpages of unreadable listings, and images that are not viewable, counts as anything at all. It's trash, plain and simple.


Also, I'm not one to run to the mods, but I'm just saying, there's gotta be some terms & services rules against plainly, blatantly lying, and posting FALSE links that don't actually work?

I mean I'm not going to call them but this really is antithetical to people actually having an adult conversation.

Instead of calling the mods (for people posting blatantly broken links and then swearing that they work, lol):

Instead, here's a wonderful song that includes a great rhyme about calling the cops.

"Johnny, CALL-THE-POLICE!

There's someone outside who's disturbing ALL-OF-THE-PEACE!!"

Now, um, ahem, in case anyone jumps into this late stage of the thread, and lands on this garbage page, here is my post from the last page, it summarizes the actual substance of the thread:

originally posted by: JamesChessman

originally posted by: idusmartias
a reply to: JamesChessman

Your efforts are appreciated but too much is being made of images that do not satisfy my optical nerves. What you see is what you get: fuzzy, over-pixelated images and wishful thinking. We have to wait and hope that superior, clear closeups will make the scene!

I completely agree that we need more images! However, it seems that China has tapped out, on releasing new images... after only publishing a total of THREE images! (That's counting both times that it was a big story in the news; it actually seems like there were more images published, but it's really only 3.)

So unfortunately, we're only left with the ONE image that actually shows the background.



(The posters above CLAIMED that there was a dump of 5,000 pics, but their link was not usable, and for all intents & purposes, they seemed to completely fabricate that claim, and then they both agreed with each other about it, lol. Talk about an INSIGHT into people's intentions, lol!)


...........


Now just for reference, like for anyone new who might be jumping into the thread at this late point, I'll just re-embed the image that we're discussing, the only ONE image that actually shows the background:

Brightened:

And then the close-up shot, which at first seemed so exciting, turns out to have its background blacked out with MS Paint paint-bucket, it would seem:

Brightened:

And finally, the new THIRD image, seems deliberately to AVOID the background, as much as possible, plus it's all low-resolution (compared to the original 2 images in much higher res).

Still, the edges of the background DO seem to contain forms.


Original:

Brightened and oversaturated, it's amazing that there's so much yellow color in the soil... as if maybe gold, or maybe just yellow sand:

a reply to: JamesChessman

Gee, if it's asking you to login I wonder what could be the solution there? What on Earth do you think you might have to do to get the images? Hmm...maybe register an account? Crazy I know. Try using your initiative to see how that might be done.

If the links don't work, how did you see what was on the pages? They work fine, otherwise you wouldn't have been able to provide that screenshot now would you?

All the images are free, no-one is asking you to pay. I can't wait to hear you whine about it being in an impossible to open format.

Now, I'm not one for running to the mods, but there's gotta be some terms of service rules about calling people liars when the only problem is someone's inability to use the internet.

For anyone new to the thread, it's about someone not understanding jpeg compression.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Gee, if it's asking you to login I wonder what could be the solution there?

^TELL us the solution, Einstein. I literally just asked you, how someone can "log in?" Do I buy the privilege of logging in? To the website that I still don't know WTF it even is?

Are you going to ever explain what the website is that you're linking? What even is the site?

How much money should I spend to purchase the privilege of "logging in" and then, the privilege of buying images that are not viewable?

I mean I have piles of money everywhere, just tell me how much $$ to spend on your promoted website, to obtain the images that you're pretending you saw?

Also HOW did you see it, on a nonfunctional website, that has no images, and no links?

I'm basically just watching a compulsive liar, compulsively lying in real time, with permanent record of the conversation, it's really amazing, lol.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Hmm...maybe register an account? Crazy I know. Try using your initiative to see how that might be done.

No, you obnoxious little brat. YOU have been FALSELY CLAIMING, for WEEKS / MONTHS, that there are thousands of images in your link.

REALITY CHECK: There are not.

The initiative / obligation is on YOUR dumb-ass to validate your OWN CLAIMS, and by refusing to do so, you're validating that your claims were false.

Well at least we're reaching the final clarity of your input, eh?

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

If the links don't work, how did you see what was on the pages?

What are you even saying. Your links are to garbage webpages of a website that you won't clearly identify, and the site doesn't clearly identify itself either.

Your linked pages are lists of unlabeled, unidentifiable, unviewable items. This is called not working.


Again, the topic here is that YOU FALSELY CLAIMED an image dump, accessible at your link. It's not.

You lied. It's on permanent record here in the thread, wtf is wrong with you lol.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

I was going to sarcastically ask you if you were going to pretend not to understand your own topic of your own conversation.

Then, the NEXT SENTENCE is... exactly that.

They work fine, otherwise you wouldn't have been able to provide that screenshot now would you?

Well jesus dude, if you can't keep up with your own topic, then how can anyone else make any sense of your input, lol.

But truly, you are an amazing specimen. Yes, make FALSE CLAIMS for a few weeks / months, then argue the semantics of your own argument, as if you stopped remembering what your input was.

Well so, what am I supposed to do now? Argue with you to remember your own argument?

Here, I'll repost my last response which fits here too.

Your links are to garbage webpages of a website that you won't clearly identify, and the site doesn't clearly identify itself either.

Your linked pages are lists of unlabeled, unidentifiable, unviewable items. This is called not working.


Again, the topic here is that YOU FALSELY CLAIMED an image dump, accessible at your link. It's not.

You lied. It's on permanent record here in the thread, wtf is wrong with you lol.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

All the images are free, no-one is asking you to pay. I can't wait to hear you whine about it being in an impossible to open format.

Listen. I have NOT seen a single image at your make-believe linked nonsense.

If they're free, then TELL US HOW TO ACCESS THE IMAGE DUMP that you're PRETENDING is at your link.

And I'll never get to see their "format" until you tell me HOW to access the images.

And why would an image "format" be a problem anyway, what is it, the early 1990's dial-up? Don't worry, I think my iMac can handle whatever image "format" is thrown at it, I mean what are you even talking about anymore, lol.

Now, I'm not one for running to the mods, but there's gotta be some terms of service rules about calling people liars when the only problem is someone's inability to use the internet.

^Cut the #. I don't speak Chinese, like half the planet, that's been established already. The Western world is not expected to be skillful in navigating Asian websites, and you know that.



Put up or shut up with your claims about your links that contain 10,000 images that are not viewable.

Prove your claim.

If you keep refusing to prove your claim, the default conclusion is that YOU LIED, and you've already been proving that the last weeks and months.

The mods will find this very interesting indeed.

I mean, even if your link WAS legitimate, you'd still be an obnoxious idiot for refusing to explain how to access the content, but hey, we're reaching the conclusion for the mods to see you're an obnoxious compulsive liar. Exactly what this forum needs, lol.

For anyone new to the thread, it's about someone not understanding jpeg compression.

Helllll no. The topic NOW is your BLATANT LIES about links containing images that they don't contain.

What's the T&C rules about posting spam / garbage links / blatant lies / etc.?

a reply to: JamesChessman

You posted a screenshot of a webpage that links you claim don't work took you to, and that screenshot id clearly showing a list of things you claim aren't there.

moon.bao.ac.cn is the Chinese Space Agency's website for its moon and mars data. All you need to do is register and there are thousands of images freely available to anyone with even a modicum of competence.

I have not lied, I have no need to, but you can add the internet to the list of things you need help understanding. I certainly have better things to do than spoonfeed a tantrum throwing toddler who isn't getting his own way.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

You posted a screenshot of a webpage that links you claim don't work took you to, and that screenshot id clearly showing a list of things you claim aren't there.

In context of YOUR conversation, the links would "work" if there was thousands of images accessible. There's not, therefore they don't work, according to your FALSE CLAIMS / LIES.

moon.bao.ac.cn is the Chinese Space Agency's website for its moon and mars data.

Hey THANKS!! I only asked you to identify the website, for what, two months or so, before you answered?

All you need to do is register...

Tell us how. Remember I'm the hilarious person who can't navigate a Chinese website, along with the rest of this half of the planet, while the other half can't access our Western internet, either, apparently, due to the language gap / translation gap.

The whole world is split up in two halves that can't easily overcome their language gap online, you're right, the WHOLE PLANET POPULATION is soooo funny, that way.

So you know, I've been asking for only a couple months, for you to explain how to use the site.

...and there are thousands of images freely available to anyone with even a modicum of competence.

...Uhhhh, ummm, but...

...If YOU had "even a modicum of competence" in YOUR own input, you WOULD HAVE already explained, SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, how to access the content, that YOU claimed, was at the link.

And on and on with criticizing half the planet for not reading Chinese, dude wtf is wrong with you, lol. Do YOU speak Chinese? Whether you do or not, how can anyone possibly think it's an insult that the Western world doesn't speak Chinese?

The internet is split between Western web and Eastern web, and your dumb-ass already knows that.

Each half of the world is basically incompetent in accessing the web from the other half of the globe. It's the ENTIRE WORLD that's set-up that way lol.

You've got such a clever insult that the entire world is split up in 2 halves with an ancient language gap...

I have not lied...

Yes, you have. You have been refusing to show / explain how to access this image dump, that you claimed to see, a couple months ago, and you've since refused to show / explain anyone else, how to do that.

The default conclusion is that you lied.

And then like I said, even if your link was legit, which it's not, but even if it WAS legit, you're still an obnoxious idiot for refusing to explain it, for months at a time, lol.

you can add the internet to the list of things you need help understanding.

Hoooly f*ck, you're a broken record here. THE ENTIRE WORLD, and the entire internet, is split into western language, and eastern language.

I mean do I have to spell it out in a different way or something. There's not an insult when it's literally THE ENTIRE WORLD that shares the same characteristic, lol. jesus christ. How about insult people for breathing oxygen.

I'm not going to learn to navigate a Chinese website, just like the rest of the Western world is also not going to. Just like the Eastern world is also incapable of accessing Western lang. web.

I certainly have better things to do than spoonfeed a tantrum throwing toddler who isn't getting his own way.

^Bull's eye!!

That's exactly IT!

That's your validation of your own blatant LIES, in your false claims, here in this thread, the last several months!

Do you even understand that, lol.

Your REFUSAL to explain how to ACCESS your claimed content, IS YOUR VALIDATION THAT YOU'VE BEEN LYING ABOUT IT.





Alright, I gotta get out of here. lol.

The topic is moon photography.




Monkey's personal topic is his repeated LIES & FALSE CLAIMS in the thread. The mod's will hopefully sort through that, while I'm taking a break away from here, lol.


Then hopefully the thread will get cleaned up, I mean I know there's gotta be T&C rules against blatant lying / false claims / compulsive lying / posting links that are garbage / spam / nonfunctional etc.

And if we're going off the rails anyway in this thread, how about some levity. I asked previously, does anyone want me to post a pic of my favorite model, i.e. the single most beautiful woman that ever existed?

It's related to the thread... because her photo's were the original reason that I learned how to manipulate the colors of digital photo's.

Anyone want to see her? Anyone curious?

I mean at least that's a positive thing to go off-rails about, lol.

Has the Rover made it there yet ?

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
Has the Rover made it there yet ?

The PUBLIC internet has received a total of 3 images.



This is the last one, i.e. the 3rd one, which deliberately avoids showing most of the background:




Brightened & oversaturated, background seems to show vague shapes, and the soil is surprisingly yellow, like gold or yellow sand:






Zoom onto a rock, which is supposedly the Mystery Hut object itself, with no background included:


^Note that the shadow looks cast from a rectangular building, while the rock looks round.

a reply to: JamesChessman

My you get grumpy without your sleepy time.

Again: show me where I lied. You're the one bitching about that, filling the thread and making a big deal out of it, not me.

You were given links to thousands (yes thousands, each link I gave you showed a count) of images taken by the yutu-2 rover. I wasn't the first to give you the link, I just elaborated on it - maybe throw your toys in the right direction.

Now, because the rest of the world didn't spoon feed you quickly enough you throw a hissy fit. It is not my problem if you're incapable of figuring out which button to click to get the English version of the site, or how to register to download the freely available data.

Simple fact is that not everyone's every waking moment is occupied with wiping your ass - if you didn't get your question answered fast enough, do some legwork of your own.

Whatever you think, you have been given working links to images taken by the yutu-2 rover. Posting a screenshot of a page you said you couldn't get to showing a list of files you said weren't there is only making one of us look a stupid, and it isn't me.

Had you kept a civil tongue in your head people might be more inclined to help you out.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

MonkeyTroll, I'm not interested in discussing your nonsense further right now. I see that you replied again. I'm not reading it.

Maybe I'll read it in a month. Or maybe I'll just be done with interacting with you, legit some people are simply purely poison that should just be avoided.


I meant it that I'm taking a break away from the thread. There's nothing new to discuss anyway right now, re: the thread topic.

And I've summarized the thread's substance quite well, earlier on the page. I guess I'll repost that summarizing post, on each new page, so that newcomers can see the substance of the thread.




As for MonkeyTroll's garbage nonsense, the MOD's will hopefully review his very interesting compulsive lying over the last several months.




Or in the astronomically minuscule chance that his claims were true, about the link, then the MOD's can see that his dumb-ass just spent like TWO MONTHS REFUSING TO VERIFY HIS CLAIMS, even if legitimate content exists at the links, then the MOD's can ponder why anyone would claim to see 10,000 images, and then SPEND SEVERAL MONTHS REFUSING TO SHOW / EXPLAIN HOW TO SEE THEM.

So the MOD's will come to one of two possible conclusions: MonkeySh*t is either a purely compulsive liar... OR he's an idiot who finds content online, and announces he found it, and THEN SPENDS MONTHS REFUSING TO TELL ANYONE, HOW TO SEE IT.

So hey, six of one, half a dozen of the other, eh?