Spike of cardiac rests of athletes hits mainstream news

a reply to: Nathan-D


It's cardiac "arrests". Please fix your title while you still can.

Something in the Gatorade.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: putnam6

OK. Epidemiology, though?

Is he qualified to do brain surgery, etc, too?

You purposely argue every single point that even remotely questions the narrative. Your responses can be replaced by an RSS feed directly from CNN.

I'm sure now after reading the posts on here that he is the World's leading expert in every field of medicine imaginable.

And certainly not a promoter of absurd antivaxxer nonsense.

Perish the thought.

That's me told off.

Effusive apologies.

No need to apologize for having an opinion but it's like every time someone opens a door of enquiry not inline with your thinking (or the bbc) you slam it shut. We have state run media too in canada and they use this tactic too.. no dissent or discussion in their new science and if we question, we don't believe in science. Odd to say the least.

This doctor's qualification may not cut it for you but, unless you are a doctor and have seen zero issues with vaccines, he's still in a better place to have seen problems in patients and comment on it. It's really like killing the messenger.

a reply to: Nathan-D

Going to the Daily Mail for a science story is like going to Kim Kardashian for advice on quantum physics.

Got a better source?

originally posted by: Nirishman
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Many factors.

Can take up to 3 years according to the inventor. not all shots are the same strength there are 3 mgs up to 30 mgs placebo shots.

1-10 percent of vaccine related deaths and injuries are reported according to a studio from Harvard, how many deaths has been reported?

What study?

What "inventor"?

a reply to: putnam6

I heard a broadcast interview with Dr Angelique Coetzee while I was walking the dog last Sunday. You know, the South African doctor that's being promoted as an expert in the omicron variant.

In more or less her own words, she said she was not a scientist and could only comment on what she had seen.

That makes her a thousand times more honest than the reporters covering her story.

She reminded us that not all expertise is equally relevant.

The reporters reminded us that appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.

"Leading Sports Cardiologist"? lol, not Cardiologists?
So like, one guy somewhere said it's probably NOT the vaccine?

ummm umkay

originally posted by: igloo

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: putnam6

OK. Epidemiology, though?

Is he qualified to do brain surgery, etc, too?

You purposely argue every single point that even remotely questions the narrative. Your responses can be replaced by an RSS feed directly from CNN.

I'm sure now after reading the posts on here that he is the World's leading expert in every field of medicine imaginable.

And certainly not a promoter of absurd antivaxxer nonsense.

Perish the thought.

That's me told off.

Effusive apologies.

No need to apologize for having an opinion but it's like every time someone opens a door of enquiry not inline with your thinking (or the bbc) you slam it shut. We have state run media too in canada and they use this tactic too.. no dissent or discussion in their new science and if we question, we don't believe in science. Odd to say the least.

This doctor's qualification may not cut it for you but, unless you are a doctor and have seen zero issues with vaccines, he's still in a better place to have seen problems in patients and comment on it. It's really like killing the messenger.

By your logic, are you a doctor?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Nathan-D
Golly…what COULD it be?

Read the article?

Ya a “statistical cluster”

It’s a “cluster” alright.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Nathan-D
Golly…what COULD it be?

Read the article?

Yep. Dr. claims it’s just “bad luck”.

Hmmm. Definitely “NOT” the vaccine though despite his “open-mindedness”.

*Deny Ignorance

I noticed between your post and this post, NO ONE answered your question.

It's a good question.

I will answer your question. It can only be one of two things.

It's a lie that these guys are dying because they have been vaccinated, OR the vaccine seems to know that you are a sports figure, or as in another thread, a pilot, to have you die.

The logical answer is, bodies are not piling up because this is not accurate info.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

a reply to: MiddleInsite

Yeah, nevermind that these two groups regularly put unique and somewhat extreme stresses on their bodies as part of their jobs. That wouldn't factor in at all, right?

originally posted by: MiddleInsite

The logical answer is, bodies are not piling up because this is not accurate info.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

I’m hoping that now you see the logic in what we’ve been saying about Covid for nearly two years.

Hopeium on my part I’m afraid.

Dropping dead is hardly an enhanced performance.

Unless your a soccer player stooging for a penalty!

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Same reason the unvaccinated aren’t piled in the streets.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Nathan-D
Golly…what COULD it be?

Read the article?

Ya a “statistical cluster”

It’s a “cluster” alright.

Yes. Read the article. Sorry it doesn't support your agenda. Never mind.

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Nathan-D
Golly…what COULD it be?

Read the article?

Yep. Dr. claims it’s just “bad luck”.

Hmmm. Definitely “NOT” the vaccine though despite his “open-mindedness”.

*Deny Ignorance

Indeed.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Nathan-D
Golly…what COULD it be?

Read the article?

Yep. Dr. claims it’s just “bad luck”.

Hmmm. Definitely “NOT” the vaccine though despite his “open-mindedness”.

*Deny Ignorance

Indeed.

Ha. So we have one guy saying some stuff, denying a real possibility as to why this is happening, no statistics backing his claim at all, and “bad luck cluster” as the culprit?

Gee whiz. Call me skeptical of his claim it ain’t the vax.

Indeed…

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Nathan-D
Golly…what COULD it be?

Read the article?

Ya a “statistical cluster”

It’s a “cluster” alright.

Yes. Read the article. Sorry it doesn't support your agenda. Never mind.

From the article…
“'Is there an issue? Are these people being tested properly? Is the game doing it? Is there something in the air to cause an increase? I'm keeping an open mind. My feeling is that this is probably a statistical cluster rather than something on the rise.”

“Statistical cluster”

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Nathan-D
Golly…what COULD it be?

Read the article?

Yep. Dr. claims it’s just “bad luck”.

Hmmm. Definitely “NOT” the vaccine though despite his “open-mindedness”.

*Deny Ignorance

Indeed.

Ha. So we have one guy saying some stuff, denying a real possibility as to why this is happening, no statistics backing his claim at all, and “bad luck cluster” as the culprit?

Gee whiz. Call me skeptical of his claim it ain’t the vax.

Indeed…

There's certain people on here who will rule out the vaxx while doing zero research and following the narrative 100% of the time. That's exactly what a rational open minded person would do right?