Head Of EU Commission Wants To Ban Nuremberg Code.

a reply to: zosimov

The Pfizer-biontech covid-19 vaccine(COMIRNATY) is approved by the FDA.

With all COVID-19 vaccine ingredients being safe and listed.

Nearly all of the ingredients in the vaccines are also ingredients found in many foods, fats, sugars, and salts.

As to choice well that's up to you.

Same as its up to employers whither or not to employ or keep on unvaccinated people.

That's nothing new by the way, as we have always jumped through their hoops if we wish to be paid and keep a roof above our heads.

a reply to: andy06shake

Does any of what you said change when you add government mandates and pressure? I'd say yes. Which is the whole point of this thread; that regarding our human rights as outlined by the Nuremberg Code.

ETA: I know that this only applies to US members, but we still have patient rights (ethical and legal) under Informed Consent.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Funny you mention that Pfizer shot: at least according to laws in the US, none of the others should be available once there is an approved drug, so what exactly did the FDA approve, and why are the others still on the market?
www.fda.gov...

smetic Act (FD&C Act), when the Secretary of HHS declaFDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.

a reply to: zosimov

Im not telling you anything that's not true zosimov

Governments have always applied mandates and pressure where our respective populations are concerned.

Again this is nothing new.

Its how they maintain a semblance of security and control.

As to the vaccinations, well mandatory vaccinations have been with us for centuries if we are honest.

Imho you catch more flies with honey rather than vinegar all the same, tell them they cannot get the vaccine and watch them queue up and fight around the block.

originally posted by: ArMaP

after an investigation it was confirmed that the companies gave them "small presents", from small things like pens and pencils to two weeks vacations for two in international tourist spots.

Yes mate apparently that kind of financial motivation is also absolutely rampant in the psychiatric industry (only on a much larger scale) - also looks like big pharma 'gifted' over $6 billion to politicians in the last 20 years.

Since Congress changed the rules back in the 1980's then one can only imagine how much big pharma's financial 'gifts' to the CDC and FDA amount to but it's pretty insane to think that these agencies are receiving huge bribes from the same companies they are meant to regulate.

a reply to: zosimov

"So what exactly did the FDA approve, and why are the others still on the market?"

The vaccine would be my bet there.

Competition is a good thing mate, monopolies not so much.

That's why.

See there is generally more than one way to skin a cat.

Pfizer is just one of many.

Simple as that really.

www.yalemedicine.org...

The above link may help shine some light on the requirement where different COVID 19 vaccines are concerned.

a reply to: andy06shake

No, you missed the point. The other, still experimental, vaccines would no longer be able to be distributed once there is an approved drug in the US, but they're all still available.

a reply to: zosimov

Don't you have more than one approved method of treatment where diseases are concerned in the USA?

Why would only one vaccine be approved if the other ones also work?

Don't you imagine other FDA approvals are in the post so to speak where the other vaccines are concerned?

They are available i imagine because of the demand for such.

End of the day supply and demand will always be the colour of the day.

If in doubt well see Coca'ine and that's certainly not approved.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: zosimov


Why would only one vaccine be approved if the other ones also work?

Because it's still all in experimental stage. People speaking out against this vaxx campaign don't want to prevent people such as yourself who want it from getting it. What many of us don't want is to be forced into a still forming experiment that, frankly, seems to be failing in what it purported to do.

The push to inject all of humanity, including babies, with a drug we still don't know much about is the most concerning part.

a reply to: zosimov

These ""experimental"" coronavirus vaccines are highly effective.

The findings suggesting that the Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna vaccines which are now FDA-approved for emergency use being safe for the most part with the benefits far outweighing any risks.

The vaccine makers will need to apply to the FDA for full approval to continue use after the pandemic if that helps matters.

originally posted by: andy06shake

Pfizer is just one of many.

Simple as that really.

Would say there's only one controlling interest when it comes to 'big pharma' - it also has controlling interest in corporate media (as well as everything else).

"The bottom line is that BlackRock and Vanguard, individually and combined, own enough shares at any given time that we can say they easily control both Big Pharma and the centralized legacy media — and then some"

Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess'

a reply to: karl 12

Like i have already suggested control and security, just like freedom, are illusory constructs at best.

Nonetheless constructs the majority of humanity would find hard to live without.

Picture a world without Big Pharma and that really is hell on Earth for the majority of our respective populations.

Don't make there pursuits any less nefarious.

"They" need you more than you need them all the same, coz they are not coming down from there Ivory towers to get their hands dirty, not whilst we exist to facilitate their lifestyles.

Killing us all with vaccines would be akin to them crapping on their own doorstep and not having anyone to clean it up.

a reply to: andy06shake

Nearly all of the ingredients in the vaccines are also ingredients found in many foods, fats, sugars, and salts.

Really now is the mRNA with nano particulate or black particulates found in foods? you actually believe that fake list? that doesn't show the full list.

a reply to: andy06shake

The findings suggesting that the Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna vaccines which are now FDA-approved for emergency use being safe for the most part with the benefits far outweighing any risks.

You are right when it comes to the risks outweighing the benefits. I see more risks than the benefits.

Even if you are vaccinated you still have chances of being hospitalized.

a reply to: andy06shake

Quite comical from your article of choice.

The inflammation, in most cases, gets better on its own without medical intervention.

I wonder how much Big Pharma paid them to write that.

originally posted by: Justoneman
Was it not a treaty? Yes and is an international law according to several places I looked.

Nuremberg Inernational Law

originally posted by: karl 12

originally posted by: myselfaswell

The discussion of forcing mandatory experimental injections is exactly the same as saying, how about we sh!tcan the Nuremberg Code. The exact wording is different but the semantics are the same.

Would tend to agree there mate and without doubt there's a lot of state (and corporate) sponsored coercion going on.

PapagiorgioCZ is right about the Nuremberg code not being a law.. but after reading it I can't think of a single reason why it shouldn't be.

Also really do wonder what answer Ursula von der Leyen would give to a direct question about why the code is being so flagrantly violated.

I'm afraid that your site doesnt discuss Nuremberg "CODE" which is

The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created by the U.S. v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War.

Just like the latter Declaration of Helsinki. They dont seem to be part of international law. They should be. I've read about it on a better site but lets play it safe and simple as none of us is a lawyer IMO and use the definition from wikipedia as a starting point.

She would say it's not experimentation but emergency use anyway. Unless there's a new military tribunal in the future, they are doing the same # as nazi doctors. Their defense was based on fact that there was no law at the time prohibiting them from doing so.
Nuremberg code wont help you. I'd suggest keeping an eye on the lawsuits the Infowars lawyer is initiating in Texas. I'd suggest gearing up for a personal resistance and fight. Everything that's being done at this point seems too late-too little.

a reply to: HawkEyi

Fake list. LoL

They don't need to fake anything.

Its all in plain sight HawkEyi.

a reply to: HawkEyi

Accept thats not what was said.

I have a chance of being many things HawkEyi.

But the vaccines minimise the risk where hospitalisation and death are concerned.

Whither or not you choose to believe that fact is up to you.

a reply to: HawkEyi

When you display that kind of paranoid nonsensical logic HawkEyi.

There really is not much more to be said as you have already made up your mind.

I find that comical to be honest.

Couple of things spring to mind all the same.

You should realise introducing any drug into your system carries with it a measure of risk down to the fact that no two people are alike.

Tells you so on the side of any Paracetamol bottle or other medication.

If you want to know what "they" are really killing you with that would be alcohol, tobacco and sugar products that a lot of you will consume without even batting an eyelid. I'm in that boat also, although i have not smoked tobacco in nearly a year.

It's hilarious really the amount of lunatics that are antivax nutters yet will quite happily drink and smoke carcinogenic poison without a care in the world.

Then again the world is a funny place, just not of the ha'ha sorts.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: HawkEyi

When you display that kind of paranoid nonsensical logic HawkEyi.

There really is not much more to be said as you have already made up your mind.

I find that comical to be honest.

Couple of things spring to mind all the same.

You should realise introducing any drug into your system carries with it a measure of risk down to the fact that no two people are alike.

Tells you so on the side of any Paracetamol bottle or other medication.

If you want to know what "they" are really killing you with that would be alcohol, tobacco and sugar products that a lot of you will consume without even batting an eyelid. I'm in that boat also, although i have not smoked tobacco in nearly a year.

It's hilarious really the amount of lunatics that are antivax nutters yet will quite happily drink and smoke carcinogenic poison without a care in the world.

Then again the world is a funny place, just not of the ha'ha sorts.

Apparently you didn't see the FDA documents on Pfizer released via a FOIA that shows the insane number of adverse effects and deaths. Yeah its real safe, enjoy your endless boosters, I'll enjoy my life long natural immunity that has 0 side effects.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: karl 12

I couldn't see here she said that, only that mandatory vaccines should be discussed.

PS: in Portugal we would need a change in the constitution for that to happen.

They can violate the Constitution all they want as long as no one holds them accountable. A piece of paper doesn't protect you, you and your community upholding your rights protect you. When evil men are able to control the media, control education, control the licensing and regulation of all trades and professions and manner of business, influence and control local, state and federal courts, infiltrate major political parties and unions and set their agenda to match their goals, neighbors, family and friends that are apart of secret societies that promise protection and wealth while they lie and play cake to your face as if they have sympathy to your plight. This is 4D chess and many of us have no experience in organizing and finding the truth, let alone share it with our fellow man. These people have had 100's of years to set up all their chess pieces for the ultimate strike, they control the narrative and the opposition, to know what's true and who is the enemy and who is the ally is near impossible in today's world. Just know this, many of us who are reading these words are not in their club and don't have access to their technology or know their game plan, yet we have an idea of their end game. Where you and I fall into that end game is yet to be known but I have a feeling when smoke clears we will not be greeted with open arms, and that's if any of us are lucky enough to survive that long. Knowing what you know now, where do you see yourself in 20 years? In a house, with a career, surrounded by family and friends and enjoying life as you work and leisure experiencing the phases of life (marriage, children, grand children, retirement, vacations..ect.)? Or in a world with 2/3 of the population gone and everyone else controlled and tracked and under constant threat of torture and arrest if you go against those who seek to rule us. Either one is possible, but it all depends on you, no one else will do it for you.