The Ancient Egyptian Stones Were Perfectly Precise How is this Possible? Many Qs Little Answers

The ancient Egyptians, not so much the later ones, shared an intimate relationship with Ra, the sun God. It was Ra gifting the Egyptians with his omnipotent powers that made it possible to erect massive stone structures that would withstand the elements over thousands of years. There was a reason for doing this which I can't go into but for your edification I can assure you that Ra is no less real today than he was way back then.

originally posted by: Hooke

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

The pyramid builders were skilled laborers and were well paid. They were even given vacation days and even family leave.

We know this because we found clay tablets in the sites that the laborers lived in recording things like their wages and permissions to return home for festivals or religious observances.

They weren't slaves, most were farmers who labored on monuments when the nile was flooded.

More description here.

Can we trust what a state owned broadcaster says?

There have been many types human over time, 21 we know of, Smithsonian.

How about a species of human we will never know of because of time, long before the Egyptians found the pyramids. Just like us but super strong and just as intelligent as us. Working as one for a common cause, much like ants.

Gorillas are considered to be 4 to 9 times stronger than an average human. Put a human brain in a gorilla and you would have a type of human that can lift much heavier weight.

I think like a bigfoot type of human (but not giant).


.

originally posted by: Anadandan
The ancient Egyptians, not so much the later ones, shared an intimate relationship with Ra, the sun God. It was Ra gifting the Egyptians with his omnipotent powers that made it possible to erect massive stone structures that would withstand the elements over thousands of years. There was a reason for doing this which I can't go into but for your edification I can assure you that Ra is no less real today than he was way back then.

The ancient Egyptians would beg to differ with you.

None of their deities (over 2,000) had the ability to gift anyone with "omnipotent power" or ever showed the slightest inclination to do so (unlike the Greek gods.) In the friezes and paintings of people moving heavy objects (including a colossal statue) there's no reference to asking Ra for powers to move anything. Ra isn't called on for superhuman or even human acts of strength.

To the Egyptians, the gods were advisors and protectors and beings who could change fortune in indirect manners (they don't toss down valuables for the person praying to them to find. When the Egyptians prayed for justice, they did not expect Ma'at or any of the other deities to show up and play policeman or judge. They expected the deities to change hearts and minds and open the eyes of others.

Ra's function and attributes also changed over time, but that's a much longer discussion.

originally posted by: Moohide
There have been many types human over time, 21 we know of, Smithsonian.

How about a species of human we will never know of because of time, long before the Egyptians found the pyramids. Just like us but super strong and just as intelligent as us. Working as one for a common cause, much like ants.

But the pyramids aren't that old.

Limestone erodes, and they're made of limestone and coated by limestone.

So if you're saying "long before the Egyptians", the earliest Egyptian artifacts are from 400,000 years ago and the earliest settlements that we know about are around 100,000 years old. The oldest skeletal remains (clearly h. sapiens) are 50,000 years old.

A pyramid of limestone sitting around for 55,000 years would look very different (lump of eroded limestone blocks) than one sitting around for 4,000 years. You'd see considerably more erosion since the Sahara was greener and wetter back then.

So... no. No "ancient and undiscovered race" building pyramids. These were built after the wet period of the Sahara, and that ended around 6,000 years ago.

a reply to: Byrd

There is also a point of interest of a relic a 7 000 year Ancient Relic which prompts to show Great Pyramids & Atlantis.
The same YTuber.
There is a lot that we arent be told truthful.

So... no. No "ancient and undiscovered race" building pyramids.

Whose to say that isn't a possibility? you had the former Egyptian archaeologist Hawass covering up most of the findings earlier discovers.

a reply to: Hooke

The BBC is giving you basically the Mainstream Version. The same things you learned in School.

But, in a complete reversal of the story of oppression told by Herodotus, Lehner and Hawass have suggested that the labourers may have been volunteers. Zahi Hawass believes that the symbolism of the pyramid was already strong enough to encourage people to volunteer for the supreme national project

Why had the BBC pushing Zahi Hawass in 2011?
Egypt's top archaeologist Hawass refutes city, tunnels under Sphinx

You had the same Hawass criticizing the discovery of the void in the pyramid. Makes you further have questions than answers.


Egypt’s top archaeologist criticises pyramid void ‘discovery’
Its comical that Hawass that says that void is nothing, Despite the cover up. There is a reason why Egypt fired him.

Zahi Hawass, who heads the ScanPyramids science committee, said, “The pyramid is full of voids and that does not mean there is a secret chamber or a new discovery.”

MSM has always being giving Hawass the attention while ignoring the current discovers made around the pyramid area and the sphinx.

You cant look at Egypt with todays societies eyes.Egypt was all about Egypt.

originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: Byrd

There is also a point of interest of a relic a 7 000 year Ancient Relic which prompts to show Great Pyramids & Atlantis.
The same YTuber.
There is a lot that we arent be told truthful.

Which relic is this? I suspect the untruth here is on the side of the YouTuber, but I'm prepared to look at evidence.

So... no. No "ancient and undiscovered race" building pyramids.

Whose to say that isn't a possibility? you had the former Egyptian archaeologist Hawass covering up most of the findings earlier discovers.

Hawass hasn't been in charge for over 5 years.

He certainly isn't/wasn't in charge of anything when when the oldest tools and skeleton were found (before 1972). That information even showed up in encyclopedias.

The archaeology of Egypt is well-known from a lot of digs since the 1700's. There's rock art (showing only modern humans) and a lot of other things... nothing that indicates another "undiscovered human."

*also* genetic evidence says there wasn't an undiscovered ancestor within the last 100,000 years in Egypt. They've been able to trace Neanderthan-human interbreeding (40,000 years ago) and so forth. If there'd been an Undiscovered Human lurking around building pyramids, they'd have found it.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Harte

No, it's not a lie. It's just that your knowledge base is incomplete regarding the similarities between the Great Pyramid complex and other similar structures around the world.

You actually believe that I don't know enough about these claims?
Perhaps you should peruse this forum over the last 15 years or so.

I said it's a lie for a reason - because I know it to be a lie.
In fact, it is unquestionably a lie and demonstrably so.
So, instead of "Nuh uh!" perhaps you should demonstrate which pyramids around the world are "aligned extremely closely with" the three largest pyramids at Giza.
To make it easy, go ahead and start with the first 100 pyramids you can find in Egypt, then work your way outward.

Harte

a reply to: Harte


Where is the Evidence the First Dynasty Egyptians Built those 3 Pyramids on the Giza Plateau Harte ? I'll Wait for your Made Up Answer to that Patiently .......

[ ]Anadandan[/post]

The ancient Egyptians would beg to differ with you.

None intings of people moving heavy objects (including a colossal statue) there's no reference to asking Ra for powers to move anything. Ra isn't called on for superhuman or even human acts of strength.

To the Egyptians, the gods were advisors and protectors and beings who could change fortune in indirect manners (they don't toss down valuables for the person praying to them to find. When the Egyptians prayed for justice, they did not expect Ma'at or any of the other deities to show up and play policeman or judge. They expected the deities to change hearts and minds and open the eyes of others.

Ra's function and attributes also changed over time, but that's a much longer discussion.

_________________________________________

So much you think you know, so little you really know.

originally posted by: Anadandan

So much you think you know, so little you really know.

Well, I do know how to read some hieroglyphs. So I know what they're saying.

the EA used flint tools to cut granite, this is proven.

here a broken sarcophogus, still in the ancient quarry. Then sanded with abrasives.

originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: Hooke

The BBC is giving you basically the Mainstream Version. The same things you learned in School.

But, in a complete reversal of the story of oppression told by Herodotus, Lehner and Hawass have suggested that the labourers may have been volunteers. Zahi Hawass believes that the symbolism of the pyramid was already strong enough to encourage people to volunteer for the supreme national project

Why had the BBC pushing Zahi Hawass in 2011?
Egypt's top archaeologist Hawass refutes city, tunnels under Sphinx

You had the same Hawass criticizing the discovery of the void in the pyramid. Makes you further have questions than answers.


Egypt’s top archaeologist criticises pyramid void ‘discovery’
Its comical that Hawass that says that void is nothing, Despite the cover up. There is a reason why Egypt fired him.

Zahi Hawass, who heads the ScanPyramids science committee, said, “The pyramid is full of voids and that does not mean there is a secret chamber or a new discovery.”

MSM has always being giving Hawass the attention while ignoring the current discovers made around the pyramid area and the sphinx.

They're found clay tablets detailing things like wages and food supplies. The pyramid builders were well compensated for their time.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Harte


Where is the Evidence the First Dynasty Egyptians Built those 3 Pyramids on the Giza Plateau Harte ? I'll Wait for your Made Up Answer to that Patiently .......

The early pyramids were imperfect, they had sides that sloped unevenly or which didn't line up properly. Later pyramids were better.

This demonstrates that whoever built them was still getting to grips with basic geometry and architecture, and wasn't some super advanced race of people who had done it before.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Harte


Where is the Evidence the First Dynasty Egyptians Built those 3 Pyramids on the Giza Plateau Harte ? I'll Wait for your Made Up Answer to that Patiently .......

There isn't any such evidence, because those pyramids were built by 4th Dynasty Egyptians.
It might be a good idea for you to make some small effort at educating yourself before commenting further. I know it's painful - but not as painful as putting your full quota of ignorance on public display.

Harte

a reply to: Mike27

The one in central Mexico. Sorry I cannot remember the name of it at the moment. It is not an identical set of structures, but it is similarly arranged like Orion's Belt, and if I'm not mistaken it is similarly located on the globe relative to the "lay lines" that exist on the globe.

a reply to: Harte

Do you know the difference between a lie and an inaccurate statement?

I find the Ancient Alien theory to be very persuasive. Some folks do not, and I'm guessing you are one of them.

You sound similar to Anthony Fauci in your apparent claim to be Mr. Science.

You can certainly disagree with AA theory, and I may certainly disagree with you.

The arrangement of the Great Pyramid complex in resembling Orion's Belt alignment is repeated elsewhere on the globe.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Mike27

The one in central Mexico. Sorry I cannot remember the name of it at the moment. It is not an identical set of structures, but it is similarly arranged like Orion's Belt, and if I'm not mistaken it is similarly located on the globe relative to the "lay lines" that exist on the globe.

Presumably Teotihuacan.

What you have there is two pyramids aligned with a road, and a third building - a temple (not a pyramid) - at the end of that road.

The third structure at the end of the road is "offset" from the two pyramids because the road leads directly to it and ends there. This has nothing whatsoever to do with Orion. It is because two pyramids are next to the road and the temple sits at the end of the road.

Harte