The Fight for Election Integrity Continues -- Audits, Criminal Investigations, Legislative Reform

a reply to: imitator

The "4 ballots" thing could be planted controlled opposition to steer people off the real trail.

There could have been 10,000 ballots in reality and counterfeit 😎

a reply to: frogs453

The story could be an implanted red herring 😎

a reply to: xuenchen

Ok you got me. Could be. You know what else could be? There was no conspiracy to commit massive election fraud found in the almost 2 years since the election.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: xuenchen

Ok you got me. Could be. You know what else could be? There was no conspiracy to commit massive election fraud found in the almost 2 years since the election.

Massive ballot trafficking in every swing state and over 200,000 counterfeit ballots found in Maricopa county indicates massive fraud. Historical events suggest a government cover-up. Jovan's covid incident doesn't change my mind about his professional work. He was hanging out with some questionable people. It seems it's hard to trust anyone with these matters, probably because of a very active government cover-up.

There's been tons of other evidence of serious fraud too. Arizona summited over one thousand pieces of it to Congress of Jan 6th. as they were contesting their electors, something 5 more swing States also planned to do. Garland Faborito found tally sheets in Fulton county Georgia that unrealistically favored Biden, were incorrect by a large amount, yet were signed by election officials. We're those election officials charged with anything? They also found duplicate ballots, just like Jovan found in Maricopa. How about the workers that ran the same stack of ballots through a scanner multiple times, something that make absolutely no sense unless you are actively cheating. The list goes on, we've managed to document a lot of the evidence here, but there's still so much more out there.

As I had mentioned before, there's another documentary coming out on July 16th that will cover the Tina Peters story and all of the venerabilities found with the election machines.

Meanwhile, people who believe that we deserve the truth will keep fighting for it.

The problem with a large list, is it's real easy to get distracted by red herrings, or pursue lines of evidence that lead nowhere (or don't prove very much even when confirmed.)


Nobody would cheat 500 different ways, with 500 different schemes. Because each different scheme exposes them to the possibility to be found out.



If cheating occurred, it would happen in only one district per state. The largest one and/or the most favorably democrat one. Why? Because that district is already expected to vote democrat, and the total number of votes is all that matters, right?

So if that district votes democrat by 200,000 extra votes, then on paper that just looks like a higher than average voter turn out.

The fix would be by way of creation of false ballots. "Sharpie gate" type events would ONLY be carried out to complicate the forensic audit, by making it harder to tell what went wrong. Not an actual attempt to change votes. Just make the rigging look accidental.


What evidence should we find?

1 - When combing through the voter registration, there would be a lot of fake registrations. Some dead people, but also likely some people who don't and never existed.

Check.

2 - Substandard ballots (are likely to happen). Runbeck's printing standards are hard to achieve, and a third party printing fake ballots probably wouldn't have the resources to achieve the same quality.

Check.


The counting machines might be hacked, but not for the purpose of changing the count. The purpose of the hack would be to let the cheaters know how the count is going in real time. Don't want to insert a million ballots if your candidate is only 50,000 behind. That would be too obvious. Don't want to insert 50,000 ballots if your candidate is behind by 55,000, because then you might cheat and still lose.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: IndieA
Historical evidence supports my understanding.

Odd that you haven't taken all your 'evidence' to court.

The stuff the ninjas are turning out probably will go to court, but they're being smart. They're building their case first, before they present it.

The early attempts to contest the matter in court ran into it half cocked with no preparation. No matter how right (or wrong) you are, you will ALWAYS lose if you go to court unprepared.

The fact a poorly submitted case didn't go anywhere doesn't tell us anything about its merit. Only its execution.

originally posted by: IndieA

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: IndieA
When does the government stop covering up what was found and actually do something about it?

Maybe when you can actually put some evidence together that would hold up in court instead of getting laughed out of everything from State to the Supreme Court.

It's not the evidence that's missing, it's a lack of uncompromised courts.

It's GUTLESS and/or CORRUPTED and/or INTIMIDATED decision-makers at the state level, first and foremost, however.

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous


The stuff the ninjas are turning out probably will go to court, but they're being smart. They're building their case first, before they present it.

The early attempts to contest the matter in court ran into it half cocked with no preparation. No matter how right (or wrong) you are, you will ALWAYS lose if you go to court unprepared.

The fact a poorly submitted case didn't go anywhere doesn't tell us anything about its merit. Only its execution.

Some very smart attorneys put together an election case that multiple states signed on to. But Supreme Court Justice John Roberts threw it out...and didn't even have the guts to sign the decision. He threw it out on a Friday at 1pm then dismissed the court for Christmas/New Year's break vacation. (I remember that day, and where I was, when the cowardly SOB threw it out.)

Flashback to December 2020: www.texastribune.org...

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous
The stuff the ninjas are turning out probably will go to court, but they're being smart.

The bankrupt company? Doubtful.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: imitator

4 ballots found going to people, along with other mail. Ok the person it was supposed to go to requests another or goes in person to vote. Some random dude tries to use the mail in ballot, the signature wouldn't match.

And since they don't check signatures (they only check to see who the vote is for to determine whether or not to count it)... ?

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: imitator

4 ballots found going to people, along with other mail. Ok the person it was supposed to go to requests another or goes in person to vote. Some random dude tries to use the mail in ballot, the signature wouldn't match.

And since they don't check signatures (they only check to see who the vote is for to determine whether or not to count it)... ?

And even some districts admitted using very rough settings on sig verification software 😎

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: imitator

The "4 ballots" thing could be planted controlled opposition to steer people off the real trail.

There could have been 10,000 ballots in reality and counterfeit 😎

I doubt it's controlled opposition...

They found the mail-in ballots in a random area off the highway.

This could mean there are more, maybe there are tens of thousands of ballots scattered for miles on that highway.

a reply to: imitator

We never found out what happened to all of the shredded ballots that Staci Burke had from Maricopa county.

Sonny Borrelli sure seemed to think that they were important pieces of evidence and asked her to run them over to his Sargent at Arms.

Then of course, there was that barn fire at one of the BOS's farms. Jovan used an image of that fire when he was explaining to the AG's investigation team that when counterfeit ballots replaced legal ballots, something had to happen to those legal ballots.

Otero County doesn't trust their current election equipment and it's causing legal issues.

www.alamogordonews.com... 007/

The Otero County Board of County Commissioners has until Friday to certify the results of the local 2022 primary election after the three member board voted not to do so earlier this week and could face criminal charges if they continue to refuse. On Thursday, the New Mexico Secretary of State's Office referred the matter to the New Mexico Attorney General's Office for a criminal investigation, citing the commissioners' dereliction of duties in office, a day after the New Mexico Supreme Court issued a court order to compel commissioners to approve the election results by June 17. Last week, the Commission also voted to do away with ballot drop boxes, discontinue the use of Dominion voting machines and require hand-counted ballots for the November election, a move it said was based on mistrust of present state voting requirements.

Here's the last meeting they had with regards to their election audit results:

From Georgia:

voterga.org...

The good news in the recently completed General Assembly session is that we were successful at stopping Brad Raffensperger’s attempt to lift the ban on private money and eliminate non-partisan poll watching. The bad news is that Gov. Brian Kemp and Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan blocked the SB89 election integrity bill just before it became law. SB89, an election integrity bill that made ballots public records came within minutes of passage on Sine Die but Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan refused to give it a vote even though it would have passed with unanimous Republican majority support. VoterGA established that Duncan acted on behalf of his friend Gov. Brian Kemp. Here is our letter to Lt. Gov. Duncan. See the latest press release on the Press Release tab or click the picture. Several Senators also voted with Duncan to prevent SB89 from getting a simple vote to accept the House changes.

The Tina Peters documentary that comes out July 16th is called Selection Code.

Here's a link.

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous


2 - Substandard ballots (are likely to happen). Runbeck's printing standards are hard to achieve, and a third party printing fake ballots probably wouldn't have the resources to achieve the same quality.

Check.

Anyone with a good laser printer could duplicate their stuff. Sorry but their standards are the same as any commercial printer, but the mobile ballot solution uses an off the shelf laser printer in a spiffy case. Hartford has one, it's actually pretty funny if you think about tit.

This is re-posting IndieA's link to the "Kinematic Artifacts" finding by Telsa Labs

cdn.locals.com...

Apparently the precision of the alignment of text is what normal printers can fail at.

Figure 5 This is a correct, legal, compliant, and official Runbeck ballot print calibration mark (looking through the front of the
ballot to the back of the ballot. Notice the target - + - aligns perfectly with the cross hairs of the sighting oculus)
Figure 6 PKAD Computer Vision Inspection Data Points (Enlarged version on following page)
From an official, legal, and compliant standpoint the follow are the items we inspect, monitor, verify and
assure are present in what is to be deemed an official mail-in Runbeck legal 2020 Maricopa County,
Arizona Ballot
A: This is where we verify the calibration (registration) of the printer which printed the ballot. We
also use this as a unique marker measured on the micron scale to identify the “fingerprint” of the
printing machine at the time of printing the ballot
B: Each official, legal, and compliant Runbeck mail-in ballot has red printing of a certain font and
style at the header and footer of the ballot and such color is displayed on both sides of the ballot
front and back
C: Each official, legal, and compliant Runbeck mail-in ballot has certain timing marks, calibration
zones, specific measurements, top and bottom calibration zones, ID marks and other patterns to
be recognized and measured
D: Each ballot lists the precinct-by-precinct number and precinct name

After this, they explain that they found a lot of ballots that didn't meet those criteria.

They mention that some were printed ballot on demand or something, instead of through Runbeck.

Our PKAD Systems currently estimate that 17% (or more) of the entire universe of the Maricopa County
Ballots are compromised at the print calibration level. 355,226 ballots in this compromised position.

NOTE: Runbeck ballots are printed in an exacting calibrated printing system, however BOD (Ballot on
Demand) is more than likely to be out of calibration. The out of calibration is a clear example of not
maintaining the voting equipment properly and not having proper standards in conducting elections.
PKAD Systems have identified, what can only be considered an egregious lack of standards, compliance,
management oversight and protecting of a citizens vote within the calibration setting of the overall ballot
printing.
21 Our systems have detected an estimated 30% + of all the printed ballots out of normal,
acceptable, and allowable machine calibration. Out of calibration printed ballots can cause votes to not
be read correctly or to be artificially adjudicated

I don't think they were printing them out of alignment on purpose. The hard thing to know how many "ballot on demand" ballots should we expect.


I'm not really interested in overturning a 2 year old election at this point. Never really was interested in overturning it at all really.

I'd just like to be able to feel confident the next one will not be tampered with.


It would help if they would make it a requirement that every ballot must have printed on it, a tag identifying exactly which, specific printing machine made it.

The ONLY issue auditors should be looking for is fake ballots, because that is the ONLY vulnerability that mail in voting creates.

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

I'm glad other people our paying attention. Thank you for that.

Just a reminder, this was an initial report that was uncomplete at the time it was written. The completed report exist now, but only parts of it have been made public. Arizona's AG Brnovich has had all of it for several months now.

One of the biggest issues for me was that they found ballots missing MIC marks, which leads to a high possibility that they came from overseas. The MIC marks identify things like the printer, date, and time and are there to help combat counterfeiting. The report claims that the counterfeit ballots were all from the same place, as it identified the "curl" of the paper, and that it all came from the same roll. This would mean a large scale industrial printing operation, and a massive batch of counterfeit ballots being printed at the same time. I guess because they have evidence of industrial printed ballots that are missing MIC marks, that makes it extremely likely that they came from overseas.

Remember the claim that counterfeit ballots were flown in from South Korea? This was actually an admission to Staci Burke by state department employee Scott Koch, he said it was okay though and that the National Guard was involved.

Remember videos of people calling Asian printing companies and finding out that they could place large orders of counterfeit printed ballots?

Remember the bamboo fibers they were looking for? They may have found them on the ballots missing MIC marks, as the report says that they found other physical evidence that was not currently being reported.



On a fringe side note, the Leonardo contractor whistleblower had claimed that 3 high ranking US officials flew to Rome after the election and were involved with the use of a military grade satellite to flip votes. There's was also talk of Hammer and Scorecard being used. These things would be classified if true, so it's hard to get to the truth of these matters.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: IndieA

When every court tosses your execrable submissions it isn't the courts, it's you.

So what is it called when every court refuses to even look at any of the evidence, and someone (in this case you) uses that fact to falsely suggest that that proves that the evidence was examined and found to be lacking?

originally posted by: tanstaafl
So what is it called when every court refuses to even look at any of the evidence, and someone (in this case you) uses that fact to falsely suggest that that proves that the evidence was examined and found to be lacking?

It's called reality. Get used to it.