The Fight for Election Integrity Continues -- Audits, Criminal Investigations, Legislative Reform

a reply to: vkey08

But how many (counterfeit/harvested) ballots got added and/or subtracted during unattended transportation to and from "Count Stations" ?

🤓

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mike Lindell Assures Everyone He Has ‘Preliminary Evidence’ Brian Kemp Stole Georgia Primary.

I take this non-LARP'y news very, very seriously just like all election fraud claims.

So they CAN steal elections !!!!!! 😎🚬

originally posted by: IndieA
The real LARP remains in believing that 81 million legal voters, voted for Biden, or that rampant election fraud can't exist.

Lindell has the goods on that too. He'll deliver on it any day now. Any day.

originally posted by: xuenchen
So they CAN steal elections !!!!!! 😎🚬

100%, Mike Lindell says so and he would never lie.

It would be easy to steal a mail in vote election. Just intercept the print data before it goes to the printer.

Only takes one person infiltrating the election bureau. And a memory stick. Bonus points if you create false registrations first, so the stolen ballots won't be missed by any (existing) recipients.

originally posted by: vkey08
a reply to: bloodymarvelous

You obviously didn't read what I wrote so here it is assign, dummed down.

1) Computers weren't programmed right, one candidate noticed she had no votes.
2) They attempted a fix and to run all the ballots through again, still didn't work
3) they HAND COUNTED all the ballots, got an accurate total.

At no time was there any threat of court proceedings, no allegations of fraud or the like from anyone associated with the campaign in question, on the flip side the election officials ON THEIR OWN decided to take these steps to make sure they had an accurate count.

Where in any of that is "stealing an election"

Speers herself is the one who caught the mistake. And she only caught it because the machines had screwed up so badly that she was showing zero votes.

The initial Democratic primary results showed Orson winning for commission District 2 with Lauren Alexander in second place and Michelle Long Spears in third. This would have put Orson against Alexander in a runoff election

However, Spears noticed that the results showed she received zero votes at most election precincts.

Basically all it would have taken for this to go unnoticed would be for the machines to give every candidate at least a few votes.

You would be calling her "crybaby" and "sore loser" if the tally had merely shown her behind, instead of completely zeroed. (And now we see it turns out she won.)

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

Sounds like the Coders were trained by Democrat I.T. "Experts" at Biden U.

I went searching for the Maricopa county election audit kinematic artifact detection report today, and found this:

cdn.locals.com...

For the sake of absolute confirmation of each finding Tesla has expanded our work to additionally deploy two further cross confirming PKAD systems. These systems are designed to reconfirm each of the individual findings herein. Tesla’s cross-confirmation systems were developed out of necessity as findings were discovered. The findings reveal serious election management, performance, and reliability issues. We agreed with the Arizona Senate our findings would be 100% transparent and all findings regarding our Kinematic Artifact Detection work for Maricopa County, Arizona would be made available to the public.

I haven't gotten to look at it too much, but at 80 pages long I'm pretty sure this is the first time I have seen this, so it may have only recently been made public.

Enjoy!

Looks like daddy's little girl is on the outs:

"Ivanka Trump was not involved in looking at, or studying, Election results," Trump posted on Truth Social, his social media platform. "She had long since checked out and was, in my opinion, only trying to be respectful to Bill Barr and his position as Attorney General (he sucked!)."

So I got a chance to go through this report that I posted yesterday.

It appears to be the unfinished report that was presented to the Arizona Senate, during the Cyber Ninja's final report spring/summer of 2021, but was mostly withheld from the public.

It estimated between 200,000 to 300,000 counterfeit ballots, and indicated that nefarious actors were involved.
It showed cases of bleed through.
It showed cases of printed imperfectly filled bubbles.
Identified cases of no folds and man-made folds
Identified multiple cases of multiple duplicate ballots in multiple batches.
It detected multiple equal protection under the law irregularities.

2020 Provisional Ballots were rejected at a rate of almost 2x over historical voting and provisional ballot adjudication indices

7,825 dead voters still registered with 3,616 of them registering after death.
5,470 of these dead registered voters voted in the 2020 general election.

“…we have detected what we label as “ballot stuffing” to increase the votes for individual candidates, in what we define as possible nefarious cast ballots being inserted into the system, in bulk and from a centralized collection location”

8. “… we have detected boxes/batches with excess of 100 precincts inserted into one voting batch, with some over 300 individual precincts in one batch. These occurrences, in our estimation (with consideration given to EV, EIP, ED coding) point to batch loading of illegal or nefarious ballots” 9. “We believe unauthorized color printing and casting of ballots of what appear to be official ballots was conducted” 10. “…what we define as counterfeit ballots have been detected in multiples” 11. “…ballot batches display significant odd combinations of flat, hand folded and machine folded ballots in which are not in sync with how ballots are collected and tallied”

It cross confirmed these counterfeit ballots by various forensic means.

Since this report was written, Jovan finished with his side of the investigation and handed over everything to AG Brnovich's criminal investigation. As he was making explainer videos for Brnovich's team, he was also releasing some of these videos and some of his final reports to the public. Many of those reports were posted in this thread and can still be found on the internet.

There's much more information coming Jovan says. Thanks to some information that came out of the Durham trial, they now know for certain that the DHS and "national security" was in play during the 2020 general election, which explains a lot. I'll go into this a little more later.

I like that the report uses statistics pretty fairly.

Like when they analyzed the offset ballots, the claim wasn't that "there shouldn't be even one", because it's possible for some ballots to be printed on demand by inferior printers.

The claim was "there are more than the number that is to be expected". They are using very credible logic.


I think some of their claims will turn out to have mundane explanations, and it is apparent that the authors have a very strong bias toward expecting to find fraud, but they are restraining themselves to using valid statistical and analytical methods, and when a person does that, their own bias has only a small amount of room to cause havoc.

Jovan Pulitzer has a radio show that he sometimes posts videos of on his Facebook account.

He makes some claims in a recent video that could explain the election rigging cover-up.

Here's a link to the video. You may need a Facebook account to access it. This was originally on Rumble as well, but I can't find it there.

m.facebook.com...

Jovan claims that some information came out during the Durham investigation and trial that explains why no one wants to look at the truth of the 2020 election.

He says that in 2016, when Hillary's emails were hacked, Russia was blamed for it, and the DHS was activated by Obama. The DHS activation allowed the Federal government new powers to monitor elections with the help of local sheriffs around the country. And that was the reason the BOS held back the internet connection logs in Maricopa and claimed that law enforcement data was co-mingled with it. When they were finally looked at, a military employee with clearances was used, and he claimed that there was no connections. Nothing to see here. Thanks Fed boy. Jovan says that some people show up to vote and are told that they already voted. This is evidence of at least some internet connectivity monitoring who has voted in real-time.

I've long since suspected government involvement in rigging the election and covering it up under the guise of "national security" and this information could lead to proving it.

I do find it hard to believe that so many sheriffs could be involved, and yet the truth remain hidden, but that could just be the top notch security measures in place. How often do sheriffs carry security clearances? I wonder.

Jovan stressed that the cover-up was taking place because if Americans learned the nasty truth, they would be furious.

Oh and one more thing I learned from this radio show. There's another election documentary coming out on July 16th called Source code. It's about the Tina Peters story and the election machine venerabilities.

Looks like another Republican in Nevada has been the victim of election fraud.....apparently by his Republican primary opponent.

You are now eating your own young.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

Looks like another Republican in Nevada has been the victim of election fraud.....apparently by his Republican primary opponent.

You are now eating your own young.

SOURCE !!!!! 😬

a reply to: xuenchen

"Maybe the establishment and swamp rats forgot who they're dealing with. I smell a lawsuit because this STINKS! I will concede nothing. No one likes No Show Joe and he absolutely is not beating me, and will not beat me in a fair fight/race. There's a reason a real fighter with real legal teams is in this fight."Joey Sour Grapes Gilbert.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

Looks like another Republican in Nevada has been the victim of election fraud.....apparently by his Republican primary opponent.

You are now eating your own young.

There are establishment sellouts in both parties.

When you have to power to rig elections, you also have to power to promise people elected positions. This is a perfect recipe for tyranny.

For many morally bankrupt people, the ends justifies the means, and that's why the world looks the way it does today.

originally posted by: IndieA
There are establishment sellouts in both parties.

He isn't establishment, he's a MAGA guy. Do you not take his claims seriously? Aren't all fraud claims serious?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I'm not talking about this one case that I know nothing about, I'm speaking in general, knowing that these statements "likely" apply.

It's the establishment that has run amuck, and is to be most closely watched, as they are the most likely to cheat, as they have the most to lose.

The preservation of power, AKA the continuity of government, has seemly crossed the lines of rigging elections, controlling elected positions of power, and manipulating and destroying facts and records to hide the truth.

This is a major issue because people elected under such conditions are most likely to serve their hidden masters and not the American people.

When this is done using the guise of "national security", top-secret programs, and cover-ups, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.

a reply to: IndieA

I'm listening to the January 6th committee explain how Donald Trump and several state Republicans were attempting to get Mike pence to consider delaying certifying Joe Biden on that day.

Even with the committee skewing everything as hard as they can against the former president, and leaving out important facts, the plan made sense.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: IndieA
There are establishment sellouts in both parties.

He isn't establishment, he's a MAGA guy. Do you not take his claims seriously? Aren't all fraud claims serious?

Crooked people are in the Vatican too, but that does not mean the church itself is crooked.

a reply to: carewemust

Nice platitude. When do we start investigating the fraud? This sounds serious.