The Fight for Election Integrity Continues -- Audits, Criminal Investigations, Legislative Reform

originally posted by: xuenchen
when the walls fell 💎

Breaking

Special counsel John Durham says five media outlets are in the pockets of Democrats, participated in the conspiracy to damage Donald Trump, and could be subpoenaed to testify in their own defense.

mobile.twitter.com...

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
when the walls fell 💎

Breaking

Special counsel John Durham says five media outlets are in the pockets of Democrats, participated in the conspiracy to damage Donald Trump, and could be subpoenaed to testify in their own defense.

mobile.twitter.com...

He needs to prosecute the anonymous media execs and PR firms involved !!!! 🥶

Musk’s Mention Highlights Twitter Counsel Baker’s Russiagate Past at FBI

m.theepochtimes.com...

This article applies to this thread, and also mentions our buddy Dennis Montgomery.

Dennis Montgomery has claimed to be the inventor of the "Hammer" supercomputer and the "Scorecard" software he claims is capable of manipulating votes.
Although he has previously worked for the government and held some of the highest levels of clearance, his trustworthiness is questionable and even the government considers him to be a con-man. Mike Lindell purchased his "PCAP" data from Montgomery for $2 million.

Here's a detailed article about Dennis Montgomery and his involvement with the Hammer and Scorecard system.

theamericanreport.org... n-did-in-2012/

SCORECARD steals elections by tampering with the computers at the transfer points in state elections computer systems and outside 3rd party election data vaults as votes are being transfered.

Basically what the audit in Arizona has revealed, what has led to the AG's ongoing criminal investigation, and why the 3rd party records and communications are so important to the investigation. This is a huge multi-level crime that needs to be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

SCORECARD uses a prismatic algorithm that Montgomery created, to achive the desired results by those who control THE HAMMER and SCORECARD.

This part is interesting because most people think that the election in Florida was on par, by I found it odd that with a national voter turnout rate of around 60%, my county had a turnout of 85%. If you are going to stuff ballot boxes, either physically of electronically, you need to use up eligibale voters votes, hence voter roll access is needed. Read/write capacities of the voter rolls allows for even more complicated manipulations. In order for an unpopular person, who doesn't campaign, to get more votes than any other Presidential candidate in history, I can only imagine that votes had to be stolen in most of the states. Doing the vote manipulation electronically simplifies things drastically so long as the paper ballots will never be looked at, and therefore, don't have to match. In Arizona, it looks like they made a massive attempt to make them match, but in Colorado, the 2020 election records are being overwritten, thus destroying any evidence of fraud.

In Florida, one of the transfer points is VR systems Inc, based in Tallahassee, Florida.

I just emailed VR systems to inquire into whether or not they allow 3rd party access into their election databases. We''ll see if they reply.

I'm still waiting to hear back from Runbeck as to why they used cheap paper and misaligned printers in the Maricopa election.

Here's the CISA reponse:

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency also has what Krebs describes in his tweet as “security safeguards built into elections.” On the agency’s website, there is a list of fact-checked rumors and misconceptions about the election process, to help dispel rumors such as supercomputer interference. More specifically, the rumor that “a bad actor could change election results without detection,” also included in Krebs’ tweet, is countered by CISA with the following: “Robust safeguards including canvassing and auditing procedures help ensure the accuracy of official election results.”

Source

Too bad it's so hard to get those canvassing and auditing safeguards, especially with regards to the 2020 Presidential election.

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: xuenchen

Somehow im missing the part of ensuring each ballot dropped off can't possibly be claimed to be "Chinese rice paper with sharpie seeping through it in the middle of the night at SF Bay by the hundreds of thousands!!!!"....as being tantamount to stealing.

Care to address that?

I'm a little bit concerned that the possibility of remote printing isn't being addressed.

All you need is one unscrupulous person to get into the election office, and gain enough trust to have access to voter registration rolls. They can enter as many names as they want into the rolls, generate print data from them, mark them as having been sent to the printer. Then just not send them. Load them on a thumb drive and take them out of the building.

After that, any printer can print them, and there are PERFECT ZERO ways to catch it.

No safeguard presently in place has any ability to stop that, and none of the forensic auditing tactics can detect it.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: IndieA
Last week I emailed Runbeck Election Services to inquire as to what happened with the Maricopa county election ballots.

I asked why ballot secure paper was not used at all, why there were so many issues with printer alignment, and other things? I haven't heard back.

The CEO of Runbeck Election Services says making ballots "secure" to the degree Arizona officials are requesting, is very VERY difficult.

See midway down - Senate bill 1120: www.nbcnews.com...

What worries me about this is, whatever measures they take would still be possible to copy.

Be better if they focus on data integrity. Such as requiring a hard copy to be made of any data "sent to the printer", like burned to a blue ray disc or something. Make multiple copies of each one and put them in separate storage places (so one accidental fire doesn't destroy the only copy...)

And then sent in person instead of over the internet.

During an audit, it could taken as a certainty that any ballot that can't be found in that data somewhere must be fraudulent.

I'm rewatching Fahrenheit 911 for the first time in decades, and the first 7 minutes or so deal with the close 2000 election. I recommend watching at least this part of the documentary.

Similar to Biden claiming that he would win because he had an election fraud team, Bush had claimed that he would win Florida, even saying, "you can write it down". Turns out that he had people in all the right places and eventually the Supreme Court decided the election. Several members of Congress tried to contest the results, but weren't given any support from the Senate.

🚬Ballot trafficking is an organized undertaking to inject fraudulent mail-in votes into the election process for pay 🙈

a reply to: bloodymarvelous


Data integrity in this day and age is impossible. For years the most secure operating system was CentOS, so much so the military used it as a base for it's applications. Cent has been cracked (and no longer exists), so that left the latest iteration of Darwin as most secure, now Darwin's been cracked.

As far as data from point a to point b, so long as there is a hop between points that is not controlled by the sender or the receiver there is the possibility of injecting corrupt data into the stream. As there are NO internet connections that do not rely on the original Worldnet or BBNPlanet trunklines , or now the Verizon Business and Comcast trunks, there is always and I mean always the chance that someone could intercept that particular stream and inject a corrupted stream in it's place. Even with military grade encryption, which as we are starting to see, is not as uncrackable as everyone thought.

Fact is we've moved way to far, way too fast. No one stopped to ask, is this technological revolution worth it, just because we can, should we?

I remember we thought by 2000 we would have hovercars and moon vacations, instead we have a planet ready to tear itself apart at the seems. I don't think all this tech has really helped us, if this is how we act.

originally posted by: vkey08


a reply to: bloodymarvelous




As far as data from point a to point b, so long as there is a hop between points that is not controlled by the sender or the receiver there is the possibility of injecting corrupt data into the stream. As there are NO internet connections that do not rely on the original Worldnet or BBNPlanet trunklines , or now the Verizon Business and Comcast trunks, there is always and I mean always the chance that someone could intercept that particular stream and inject a corrupted stream in it's place. Even with military grade encryption, which as we are starting to see, is not as uncrackable as everyone thought.

That's a good reason why the print data should not be sent over the internet. And voter roll information should be on servers that have no outside connection to the internet.

When they want to send print data to the printer, they should burn it onto a blue ray disc (and make copies for their records of that disk). Then send it via registered mail. The "red tag" version that's insured and tracked.

They should make a video of themselves putting the disk into the packaging. And the printer should make a video of themselves opening the packaging and confirming the contents.

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

Sounds reasonable to most people but you’ll get the excuse from many that is too hard to do that.

There are reasonable solutions to problems that are well known in the voting systems and some of them would cost little to no money just a change in current procedures.

Why no one seems to want to do it is because the problem is so large and the number of people in on it is much larger then they want to be exposed. When you look outside the box and how simple the voting process could be it’s really amazing how a country so advanced has made the process so complicated and open to fraud and mistakes.

originally posted by: vkey08
a reply to: bloodymarvelous
For years the most secure operating system was CentOS,

Ridiculous on many fronts...

For the most part, an operating system is only as secure as it is configured.

A hardened Gentoo system can be configured to be much more secure that CentOs ever was out of the box. And there are many others that are likely even better.

I'm not saying CentOS couldn't be configured to be very secure, obviously it can. But it can also be badly configured and be an easy target for script kiddies.

Hey all --

I've got a lot to post, but this internet connection isn't great, so I'm going to have to be kinda tricky about this. I've got tabs open for three replies that I'll write up while offline. When I post those, we'll see what I have left and if I have to do it again.

Hopefully after the end of the week, I'll have all this worked out. I've got a new phone and a new internet provider -- as soon as I get the new router... or is it modem? Hellifiknow! A new laptop too. Soon I'll be able to do this in the garden!!!

And totally off-topic, because I know I've got some great cooks here, any yummy recipes for pattypan squash? AKA scallop squash? Somehow I ended up with yellow pattypan squash instead of yellow crookneck squash. I've heard of it but never tasted it before, much less cooked it! I found a recipe for southern fried, and I'll probably give it a go on the grill next time we bbq. But other than that, I don't know what to do with it! Any ideas or suggestions are very welcome and most appreciated...

originally posted by: Charliebrowndog
a reply to: bloodymarvelous

Sounds reasonable to most people but you’ll get the excuse from many that is too hard to do that.

There are reasonable solutions to problems that are well known in the voting systems and some of them would cost little to no money just a change in current procedures.

I know. ... and it's sad.

A USB blue ray burner is 65 bucks on ebay

www.ebay.com...:g:CcQAAOSw3ZFfmfhP&amdata=enc%3AAQAGAAAA4NimNsf11S2tdkS%2BD%2B1OzPzfuKHHN 7AaVhUFfgZVACyX3vOPGWa4SjlSpXqA3MgrHbsNHSuJnJHyoLcac3yaXEb%2F%2BCG85UF6ftuwCnq1elP8TIQ%2BcTYOcabEO%2BpKS4NlqskzeMkeV3W1aE0WBGKnOl8kXwsr9qDwi3VV%2Fa4Ub 6eXk1FbXYQMuD9%2F%2B6IWqi5WeJECdKDGFm0fAuV4J1n7bdMbGya0%2BCXQvXMRGgb7EC8BwUI1vZyB6KE2GW1CXjQWhtnInysMkgHYi66amGjjUwbS2Zq2Tj0wp%2FMSF0ukf2ww%7Ctkp%3ABF BM2OOK-5Bg

You can get 50 burnable discs for 28 bucks on Amazon

www.amazon.com...=sr_1_4?keywords=burnable+blu+ray+discs&qid=1651544123&sprefix=b urnable+blue+ra%2Caps%2C487&sr=8-4


But someone in the election office will say he needs $20,000 just to do a study on the feasibility. 50,000 to implement it.

Why no one seems to want to do it is because the problem is so large and the number of people in on it is much larger then they want to be exposed. When you look outside the box and how simple the voting process could be it’s really amazing how a country so advanced has made the process so complicated and open to fraud and mistakes.

Bureaucrats don't like admitting than an Excel spreadsheet can replace 10 of them.

Trump calls into Senate campaign event in Arizona to complain about Brnovich, election audit

“I just want to thank you all, you’re an incredible group. I heard Blake was the person that showed up and I want to thank Blake,“ Trump said through a cellphone to a cheering crowd, baselessly asserting there were millions of corrupt votes in 2020. Trump claimed Brnovich wanted “to take that middle path” with his recent "interim report," which made no accusations of wrongdoing on the part of any individuals and did not cite specific instances of possible crimes. It did, however, note that the "investigation is still developing in material ways." Trump said of Brnovich: “He found all sorts of things, but he didn’t want to do anything about it.”

Special grand jury seated in Trump election interference investigation in Georgia

According to Georgia law, special grand juries may compel evidence and subpoena witnesses and may require the production of records, and documents, of any person, firm, or corporation which relate to the subject of the investigation being conducted by the investigative grand jury.

So, it's possible that the truth will come out of this and Trump will be exonerated.

Can we get a grand jury to investigate Joe Biden and team?

originally posted by: IndieA
Can we get a grand jury to investigate Joe Biden and team?

No you sure cant. Not based on what is clearly the sycophantic extreme right sites you like to espouse. If you're gonna cite a source, at least do it with integrity... Kinda like the below video that you can start watching at 20 minutes so you can get some friggin context and stop trying to push BS

a reply to: alphabetaone

Well, that didn't change my mind at all.

I thought it was interesting that he was telling people to go vote early though, and that somehow the fate of democracy was riding on the election. Hmmm.

originally posted by: IndieA
Can we get a grand jury to investigate Joe Biden and team?

Already happening covertly 🕳️🚬