NEWS: Wolfowitz dating a muslim causes stir in Washington

Paul Wolfowitz, the jewish-neocon leader married to his jewish wife Clare Selgin, is reportedly dating Shaha Ali Riza, a tunisian-born influential muslim woman. Critics see this relationship interfering with Wolfowitz's nomination as world bank president, as Shaha Ali Riza is seen as one of the primary resposibles for hyping Washington politics towards the Iraq blunder.




I find it remarkable that the number one responsible of the US suicidal pro-israeli apartheid and war politics privately prefers muslim women. Is it his israeli slave-trader mentality showing through ?

I can see this getting voted down by the usual Redneck block, one of the reasons I don't post anymore. How dare we mention something that could conceivably put Wolfie the Jew defender of Israel in a bad light.

Reports indicate that Dr. Clare Selgin Wolfowitz separated from Paul because he had an affair with a woman at Johns Hopkins University. Paul Wolfowitz was Dean and Professor of International Relations at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) of The Johns Hopkins University. During that time he used his position to prey on woman under his authority When the scandal broke he and his wife Clare separated but appear not to have divorced. At this point it is unclear if the relationship with Shaha Ali Riza predates the scandalous affair at SAIS.

Sorce: www.sw-asia.com...

Notes on Dr. Paul Wolfowitz



[edit on 27/3/2005 by Sauron]

I vote against it, I am NO redneck. I say you should becareful what you call people.

Great find!



Probably just some anti-republican propaganda in action, but still a nice story.

IF it is True anyway!

Well for the record, i suspended voting until the member can provide a less biased source link.

Sanc'.

I think it's important to discuss Wolfowitz, his world views, and his perversions, as he's been nomiated as world bank president. I'm sorry if that involves exposing his racist/israeli thinking. You can't just take him out of the usual critical public discussion/scrutiny procedure just because he's a jew.

[edit on 27-3-2005 by krotzkrotz]

Very good find

Very interesting to see how main figures have their own domestic problems and issues.

Hey isn't love beyond borders, and color blind.

Specially if you are married all ready. and dating the "enemy"

sanctum, did you read the article ? It's not biased at all, please explain what you mean .. ?

Yes i read the source link...

WASHINGTON, 23 March 2005 — Here’s a bit of news that had Washingtonians choking on their coffee this morning: President Bush’s neoconservative hawk Paul Wolfowitz, the Pentagon’s architect of the US invasion of Iraq, is dating a Muslim!

Would an unbiased site use this kind of grammar? I think not.

"I can see this getting voted down by the usual Redneck block, one of the reasons I don't post anymore. How dare we mention something that could conceivably put Wolfie the Jew defender of Israel in a bad light."

I vote yes, and I AM a redneck!
Well, at least, I USED to be...

Anyway, putting this up can't put him in any worse light than he's bringing on himself, I mean, have you SEEN her?!?

There needs to be a mandate on name calling. NO tolorance(sp).

Specially if you are married all ready. and dating the "enemy"

I like that. In Bed With The Enemy!

Around the world, the notion of US Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz leading the World Bank met with reactions that ranged mainly from official reserve to outright denunciation, but there was some support.

I think mister Wolfowitz is getting a taste of his own medicine.

Now after his nomination for leader of the World Bank by mister Bush; the reaction is not really good. But there was some support....

I voted yes and i'am not a fan of Wolfy (or any neo-con) but...

Leave the guy alone, don't mix his personal life with his political life. If his happy dating this girl then good for him.

sanctum, you mentionned that my intro is biased. I cant see that. Just because i use the word "jewish". Is that already being biased ? Or calling Iraq a "blunder" ? It's not biased either...

Luv it

The spin on this will last for weeks. Claims of diversity and acceptance will be fantastic. Poor woman! Talk about 'sleeping with the enemy'

Hey, mixing political and private life is always a favorite technique, used by counter-political-propaganda. Even if its a rumor, or simple a lie; you get it out and then let the Enemy deal with it. And try to deny it. That is a favorite tactic of dear "Boy-Genius" Karl Rove. If he got an information like this about some democratic political figure, he would NOT hesitate a second to get it out!

So, if he can do it, why cant any other?

Who cares if its true, as long as people talk about it!

Originally posted by JoeDoaks
Luv it

The spin on this will last for weeks. Claims of diversity and acceptance will be fantastic. Poor woman! Talk about 'sleeping with the enemy'

If i was a muslim i would vote for her being exorcised or cast out of the religious community for sleeping with Wolfowitz. It's probably gruesome for muslims to imagine a fellow muslim dating one of the world's top-ranked muslim killers & enslavers. I bet she won't show up in a muslim country for the rest of her life

Originally posted by krotzkrotz
If i was a muslim i would vote for her being exorcised or cast out of the religious community for sleeping with Wolfowitz. It's probably gruesome for muslims to imagine a fellow muslim dating one of the world's top-ranked muslim killers & enslavers. I bet she won't show up in a muslim country for the rest of her life

Damn! You are right! We are so concerned about our dear Paul, we forgot about his "woman"!

She better not go back to the Middle East now. She's safer with Paul in America.

Originally posted by krotzkrotz

Originally posted by JoeDoaks
Luv it

The spin on this will last for weeks. Claims of diversity and acceptance will be fantastic. Poor woman! Talk about 'sleeping with the enemy'

If i was a muslim i would vote for her being exorcised or cast out of the religious community for sleeping with Wolfowitz. It's probably gruesome for muslims to imagine a fellow muslim dating one of the world's top-ranked muslim killers & enslavers. I bet she won't show up in a muslim country for the rest of her life

This is why I voted down, it is wrong to say things like that.

We are NOT at war with all muslims. Period. Would you kick a black girl out of her community for dating a white guy? It just racist.

[edit on 27-3-2005 by SpittinCobra]

We are NOT at war with all muslims. Period. Would you kick a black girl out of her cmmunity for dating a white guy? It just racist.

That would be racist, but this story is not. Just because the guy is....dare I say it.....a jew, then why can we not post about him? It is rather unusual for a Jew to date a Muslim, and especially one of the most influential (and Hawkish) ones in Washington. It does merit news coverage.

Please explain why the no vote? And how can you say a "less biased news source"? Firstly, all news is biased in one way or another, and secondly, are you worried about the perceived bias just because you don;t agree with it? That in itself is bias, and you are being hypocritical in voting No just because you have a different view on things to someone else.

That shouldn't distract from the newsworthyness of the story itself. If you want to apply your own spin, then vote yes, and provide your own info to back up your side, don't shoot people down just because you get upset.

(happens to me all the time, a perfectly legit news story, and it will attract no votes in 5 secs flat if it doesn't conform to someones twisted little views)