It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: opethPA
actually, the more I think about it, the restaurant did do these folks a favor. They have an at risk kid at home, and the restaurant was fully mask less, as the article states. Had this couple decided to take off their masks, and eat, they could have caught the horrible sickness that is Covid 19 and brought it home to their child. Since they were able to retain their life saving device, they were thusly able to keep their kid safe.
I think they should be grateful for the policy and how well it was enforced.
So then does the wearing of masks not come down to personal freedom or personal choice?
If these people believe that wearing a mask is the right thing for them to do based on the info they have how is that any less valid then those that believe not wearing them is the right personal choice?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: network dude
It's weird because everyone who was making a hubbub over the mask mandates and how unethical it is to turn away customers who are unmasked are now defending the businesses who apparently have the right to turn customers away because the customer was wearing a mask.
As I said previously either individual liberty applies to everyone equally or this debate was never about liberty at all.
originally posted by: network dude
The truth delivered honestly, is a powerful message.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: marg6043
we are having a small sector of the population of young males wearing hoodies and mask all the time and they do not look like up to any good
Just come out and say it.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Has nothing to do with race.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Has nothing to do with race.
Mmmhmm. So hoodie wearers are the bold text, "small sector of the population" she was referring to?
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Who was referring to?
The uh... person I quoted before you quoted me.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
You assume that is a she? Or do you know?
Am I wrong in saying the majority of mass killer in Afghanistan are of the Islamic faith?
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
You assume that is a she? Or do you know?
Am I wrong in saying the majority of mass killer in Afghanistan are of the Islamic faith?
Marg is a she. She's made that quite obvious.
And, no. You are correct. What does that have to do with her being afraid of masked black dudes in America?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: network dude
It's weird because everyone who was making a hubbub over the mask mandates and how unethical it is to turn away customers who are unmasked are now defending the businesses who apparently have the right to turn customers away because the customer was wearing a mask.
As I said previously either individual liberty applies to everyone equally or this debate was never about liberty at all.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
It means different things if you are in Chicago versus Atlanta, as I would assume being Islamic would mean different things in different regions of Afghanistan.
99.7% of Afghanistan is Muslim. Where are you going with this?