It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: HairForceOne
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: opethPA
You don't take a newborn into a restaurant while a plague is raging.
What selfish parents!!
They left the baby with a babysitter. They were there alone.
Oh. Then why is this thread still in existence.?
The drop-kicker is them wearing a mask far away won't protect their child đđŹ
How is that relevant?
Personal choice only applies to the "mah freedoms!" anti-mask people?
Wuhan Freedom !!đ
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: opethPA
In your link it states the host asks guests to remove their masks.
This couple didn't and was asked to leave.
They decided to write a post about it.
Snowflake mentality.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: opethPA
In your link it states the host asks guests to remove their masks.
This couple didn't and was asked to leave.
They decided to write a post about it.
Snowflake mentality.
Glad to hear your opinion on the matter.
If you think for one second that someone who got kicked out for a not wearing a mask wouldn't post about it then that is on you .
originally posted by: seagull
For wearing a mask.
For not wearing a mask.
Admittedly, I hate wearing the damned things...but upon occasion, I have to.
Odd that a business would require not wearing them...sounds kinda stupid to me, but whatever. But it is their business.
Half-ass pushback, IMHO.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: opethPA
In your link it states the host asks guests to remove their masks.
This couple didn't and was asked to leave.
They decided to write a post about it.
Snowflake mentality.
Glad to hear your opinion on the matter.
If you think for one second that someone who got kicked out for a not wearing a mask wouldn't post about it then that is on you .
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: opethPA
actually, the more I think about it, the restaurant did do these folks a favor. They have an at risk kid at home, and the restaurant was fully mask less, as the article states. Had this couple decided to take off their masks, and eat, they could have caught the horrible sickness that is Covid 19 and brought it home to their child. Since they were able to retain their life saving device, they were thusly able to keep their kid safe.
I think they should be grateful for the policy and how well it was enforced.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: opethPA
actually, the more I think about it, the restaurant did do these folks a favor. They have an at risk kid at home, and the restaurant was fully mask less, as the article states. Had this couple decided to take off their masks, and eat, they could have caught the horrible sickness that is Covid 19 and brought it home to their child. Since they were able to retain their life saving device, they were thusly able to keep their kid safe.
I think they should be grateful for the policy and how well it was enforced.
So then does the wearing of masks not come down to personal freedom or personal choice?
If these people believe that wearing a mask is the right thing for them to do based on the info they have how is that any less valid then those that believe not wearing them is the right personal choice?
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: opethPA
actually, the more I think about it, the restaurant did do these folks a favor. They have an at risk kid at home, and the restaurant was fully mask less, as the article states. Had this couple decided to take off their masks, and eat, they could have caught the horrible sickness that is Covid 19 and brought it home to their child. Since they were able to retain their life saving device, they were thusly able to keep their kid safe.
I think they should be grateful for the policy and how well it was enforced.
So then does the wearing of masks not come down to personal freedom or personal choice?
If these people believe that wearing a mask is the right thing for them to do based on the info they have how is that any less valid then those that believe not wearing them is the right personal choice?
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: opethPA
actually, the more I think about it, the restaurant did do these folks a favor. They have an at risk kid at home, and the restaurant was fully mask less, as the article states. Had this couple decided to take off their masks, and eat, they could have caught the horrible sickness that is Covid 19 and brought it home to their child. Since they were able to retain their life saving device, they were thusly able to keep their kid safe.
I think they should be grateful for the policy and how well it was enforced.
So then does the wearing of masks not come down to personal freedom or personal choice?
If these people believe that wearing a mask is the right thing for them to do based on the info they have how is that any less valid then those that believe not wearing them is the right personal choice?
These are the type of people that made this sort of thing an issue in the first place.
Kind of like the gay couple that specifically chose to ask a religious baker to make their wedding cake.
They can't stand it when others don't think like they do so they feel the need to virtue signal.
This couple absolutely did this for the viral fame it would bring. I'd bet they have a gofundme set up already.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: opethPA
actually, the more I think about it, the restaurant did do these folks a favor. They have an at risk kid at home, and the restaurant was fully mask less, as the article states. Had this couple decided to take off their masks, and eat, they could have caught the horrible sickness that is Covid 19 and brought it home to their child. Since they were able to retain their life saving device, they were thusly able to keep their kid safe.
I think they should be grateful for the policy and how well it was enforced.
So then does the wearing of masks not come down to personal freedom or personal choice?
If these people believe that wearing a mask is the right thing for them to do based on the info they have how is that any less valid then those that believe not wearing them is the right personal choice?
These are the type of people that made this sort of thing an issue in the first place.
Kind of like the gay couple that specifically chose to ask a religious baker to make their wedding cake.
They can't stand it when others don't think like they do so they feel the need to virtue signal.
This couple absolutely did this for the viral fame it would bring. I'd bet they have a gofundme set up already.
I'm sure as an anti-mask person you responded with the same virtual signaling assessment around other threads here that agreed with your choice?
"An unmasked Canadian man was so peed-off about a Dairy Queenâs face covering mandate that he relieved himself on the counter of the fast food restaurant, footage posted on Facebook showed"
Man urinates on Dairy Queen counter over mask policy = www.abovetopsecret.com...
a reply to: av8r007
I'm sick of people running around masked and unidentifiable, it encourages crime, it emboldens bad behavior and other negatives like reduced social interaction. There was a reason for mask laws, because in the old days people in masks (just like today) typically were up to no good and committing a crime. The masks need to go away for a lot of reasons, and this business has the right to say they don't want unidentifiable customers anymore.
a reply to: LSU2018
I'm a full-time non-mask wearer that never wore one at all other than going with my wife for her day surgery once back in 2020