It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
Tuesday, September 14, 2021
This back-n-forth goes on for 30 minutes. "Arguing" about things ranging from Vaccines starting to wear off after 30 days, to Congress and the White House exempting themselves from the Vaccine mandates because they are potentially dangerous drugs long-term.
Eventually she gives up, says the bloodwork came back with normal results, and tells me she regretted wasting so much time on me, while other patients who listen and appreciate her advice, are waiting to see her.
Bottom Line: There is potentially something very wrong with these vaccines, but due to the huge $$$ they generate for so many individuals, their potential dangers are only recognized in the form of official vaccine waivers for VIPs in society.
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: RetsuUnohana
It's funny how Judges are exempt, I bet if they mandated them it would grind to a judicial halt. If you cant smell a rat by now your sense of smell isn't the only thing wrong.
Sorry define “proper data”?
originally posted by: MrNewWorldOrder
a reply to: PaPaTaco
I'm sorry that you have had such a negative experience with healthcare serivices. You have relayed an interesting narrative and the theme of dissatisfaction is evident. I can't comment further but don't seek solace from a place like this. You'll get all the agreement that you want, but it's just that. Juyst make sure you are looking at proper data and not Joe Bloggs from ATS with an axe to grind. Take care.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
The shots are dangerous to all, fatal to many. Though just measuring the tip of the iceberg, VAERS shows more deaths and harmful effects than all other vaccines combined since VAERS began.
Because the viral infection is easily treated with existing therapies, a vaccine is not authorized under 21USC360. HCQ and Ivermectin have excellent success.
Warp Speed benefited pharma and the friends of Donald Trump. They delivered a toxic drug to a crazily frightened herd. The rest is history.
Oh yes, by the way the shots don't work as growing data shows.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
The truth is seen as absurd by many. As Orwell noted, in a time of universal deception (that's now) speaking the truth is a radical act.
Trump has friends in industry, including pharma. You may choose to pretend otherwise, and that's OK.
As Dresden James noted, when a well packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.
originally posted by: sunkuong
So your doctor tells you to be vaccinated to protect you health,
and your argument is that 25% of patients in your county have been vaccinated but still have covid.....as opposed to the 75% who are not vaccinated having covid?
And you would rather be the 75%
No-one can help you if you won't follow your GP's advice.
I just hope you don't get sick and find yourself unable to seek care.
Because, Care I must.
originally posted by: PerfectAnomoly
a reply to: carewemust
Carwemust... Why are you so combatative?
Have you considered that your doctor might be offering you this advice because she cares about your health?
Have you considered that maybe she knows what she is talking about?
Have you considered that you may be wrong?
have you considered that the huge number of doctors/immunologists/medical officials know more than you about this? You know, because they have studied it all their lives...
It's quite sad listening to how proud you are that you ignored all her advice... She's just trying to help you you know..
PA
Source: www.natlawreview.com...
Petitioners also argue that OSHA has the science wrong for those with “natural immunity.”
Perhaps one of the more surprising elements of the ETS, they argue, is that OSHA is discounting employees who have recovered from COVID-19 and have “infection-acquired immunity” by requiring those individuals to be vaccinated or be subject to the weekly testing requirements of the ETS.
Petitioners in the Sixth Circuit argue this is flatly wrong. They note that the largest scientific study to date found natural immunity provides equal or better immunity than that induced by vaccination.
These petitioners also note that ETS erroneously defines the “grave danger” as the lack of vaccination, rather than lacking immunity.