So give me a good reason why I need a jab for a common cold that has 0 to 0.1 percent death rate?

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: humanResistance
Here in Ontario lately the virus has attenuated so much it is far weaker than seasonal flu. So why should I take a risky jab? A New Zealand woman just died yesterday after Pfizer.

news

Because others are too big for their britches and think they're owed a groveling pissant at their feet.

They aren't owed squat, and there is no good reason to bend over & spread 'em for that.

a reply to: RazorV66

You have no idea how tempted I was to go with "uppity". Obvious racial historical connotations aside, it fits Covid Cathys like a glove.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: humanResistance
Here in Ontario lately the virus has attenuated so much it is far weaker than seasonal flu. So why should I take a risky jab? A New Zealand woman just died yesterday after Pfizer.

news

You could be asymptomatic sprinkling little traces of virus all around the community and not even know it.

Nah. That's just fairy dust you'd be sprinkling around. You know, fairy dust, that make believe stuff that doesn't really exist.

Same thing.

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: humanResistance
Here in Ontario lately the virus has attenuated so much it is far weaker than seasonal flu. So why should I take a risky jab? A New Zealand woman just died yesterday after Pfizer.

news

You could be asymptomatic sprinkling little traces of virus all around the community and not even know it.

Nah. That's just fairy dust you'd be sprinkling around. You know, fairy dust, that make believe stuff that doesn't really exist.

Same thing.

So you're telling me there's no pandemic and the virus is a hoax.

a reply to: TzarChasm

Your reading comprehension is astonishing

originally posted by: imitator
a reply to: humanResistance

if anyone wants to know the risks, here is a chart to help you decide:

You could add one more column for accuracy, labelled COVID 19 virus.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: humanResistance
Here in Ontario lately the virus has attenuated so much it is far weaker than seasonal flu. So why should I take a risky jab? A New Zealand woman just died yesterday after Pfizer.

news

You could be asymptomatic sprinkling little traces of virus all around the community and not even know it.

Then all those people will have immunity and a 99% survival rate. He is more likely to kill someone driving to the grocery store than killing them with COVID-19.

Do you think we should force all people with aids into confinement?

Oooo, another anti vax thread..refreshing!!

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: imitator
a reply to: humanResistance

if anyone wants to know the risks, here is a chart to help you decide:

You could add one more column for accuracy, labelled COVID 19 virus.

I hope you're not expecting anyone to not be disingenuous here, and they aren't good at math either.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

I think someone that's been alive for seventy five years is capable of making their own decisions.

That is not my point. People throw around things like 99.97% and that is not over everyone, so if a person 75 thinks they are 99.97% OK we are doing that person a disservice to actually make the correct decision for their situation.

originally posted by: humanResistance
Here in Ontario lately the virus has attenuated so much it is far weaker than seasonal flu. So why should I take a risky jab? A New Zealand woman just died yesterday after Pfizer.

news

10s of thousands have died from it in the United States. I sincerely doubt that was the "first" person who died in NZ from it.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

I think someone that's been alive for seventy five years is capable of making their own decisions.

That is not my point. People throw around things like 99.97% and that is not over everyone, so if a person 75 thinks they are 99.97% OK we are doing that person a disservice to actually make the correct decision for their situation.

And you are assuming that 75 year olds are thick and can't think for themselves.

Also, your virtue signalling is pathetic. What happened to you?

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: humanResistance
Here in Ontario lately the virus has attenuated so much it is far weaker than seasonal flu. So why should I take a risky jab? A New Zealand woman just died yesterday after Pfizer.

news

10s of thousands have died from it in the United States. I sincerely doubt that was the "first" person who died in NZ from it.

5% of the number reported actually died from COVID. Would you be willing to count all vaccination deaths the same way we counted for covid?

Sure, there's a virus. there are lots of viruses. There are new flue strains every year. I reckon that this Wuhan virus maybe exists, and I reckon that maybe it is particularly nasty .

As to the plandemi ... Uh, excuse me ... pandemic, that's the hoax, IMO.

ETA: And as far as "asymptomatic transmission," ...

Say, I got some ocean front property up in New Mexico that you might be interested in. Or maybe an interest in the Golden Gate bridge?
:

a reply to: humanResistance

a reply to: glen200376

Accurate.

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: humanResistance
Here in Ontario lately the virus has attenuated so much it is far weaker than seasonal flu. So why should I take a risky jab? A New Zealand woman just died yesterday after Pfizer.

news

10s of thousands have died from it in the United States. I sincerely doubt that was the "first" person who died in NZ from it.

5% of the number reported actually died from COVID. Would you be willing to count all vaccination deaths the same way we counted for covid?

From what I've seen about the problems with the testing, and the concerted effort by officials to ignore the fact that there are tons of asymptomatic people not even being counted, none of the Covid numbers are reliable.

The vaccine numbers are equally unreliable, including how effective it is. There was a thread on this a few weeks ago. The Pfizer trials presented to the FDA had a gigantic uncertainty in their calculations, and they simply threw out the uncertainty, pretended it didn't exist, and gave them the emergency approval based on a faulty calculation.

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: humanResistance
Here in Ontario lately the virus has attenuated so much it is far weaker than seasonal flu. So why should I take a risky jab? A New Zealand woman just died yesterday after Pfizer.

news

You could be asymptomatic sprinkling little traces of virus all around the community and not even know it.

Then all those people will have immunity and a 99% survival rate. He is more likely to kill someone driving to the grocery store than killing them with COVID-19.

Do you think we should force all people with aids into confinement?

HIV isn't a respiratory virus.

a reply to: iwanttobelieve70

5% of the number reported actually died from COVID.

Used to be 6%. But yes, a relative few die as a direct result of the disease. But something caused a hell of a lot more people to die in 2020 than in previous years. Maybe all of a sudden their time was up. Or maybe they wouldn't have died had it not been for COVID.

Maybe COVID had nothing to do with it. What do you reckon it might have been, last year, that caused such an increase in deaths?

originally posted by: imitator

if anyone wants to know the risks, here is a chart to help you decide:

Well excuse me didn't know... Where do we bury the 4 billion?