It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
It is also possible that they weathered it better. Dirty living means more immune system exposure earlier and often. If COVID really is just a massive cold, there is a point where a balance might be reached and many shrugged it off.
Let's look at our own homeless populations. You might have expected them to be shredded, and yet, they weren't.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Short version: the mortality as a function of total population is higher than cited, but real mortality per COVID infection is probably much lower.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
No such macro picture can be drawn with covid. There is no trend, regardless of the range, or the median, or even the mode or mean. To anyone with a basic understanding of mathematics and statistics, this is significant.
originally posted by: nonspecific
Agreed. It's never going to be known how many positive cases were unreported but I'd assume the number although high would be lower in more advanced nations simply because they will have better access to testing.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
The Big Picture is a far more complex game than most imagine.
originally posted by: baddmove
And!
18-20 months later and I still don't know anyone who knows anyone who knows ANYONE
who has had Covid-19 and I have family in 5 states.
originally posted by: Brotherman
We are watching the world implode on itself because no one can come to a general consensus. When half don’t think up is up and half thinks up is down it’s really hard to make a general consensus.
For example vax is good.
No vax is bad
10billion pages later of conflicting results
No one got anywhere
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
The Big Picture is a far more complex game than most imagine.
Russia is only about 150 million people sitting on massive reserves of all kinds of stuff that China would give up 500 million people to have...
originally posted by: Thoughtcrime
And, like Xtrozero said, China could STILL afford to lose 500 million people to take over the Russian Far East.