Lab Founder Shows "Vaccine" Spike Protein Damages Vital Organs

a reply to: Itisnowagain

You really should say exactly what you want a link for, I think that you may have deliberately withheld this information so that you can claim that whatever link I give you isn't sufficient. Next time, please say what you want to see.

I'm going to guess at what you want. This link doesn't provide you with all everything, but it contains links to most of it, just click through. For example, it links to pages about the timing and composition of the study and the side efects experienced by the people who participated. It shows clearly that the while main stream vaxxing began in December 2021 actual vaxxing through trials began around 6 months beforehand, and by this time last year pfizer alone had vaxxed around 50,000 people in three tirals. So that's 50,000 people vaxxed for over a year. Well, nearly 50,000 anyway.

Vax details

For more specifics:

www.nature.com...

www.pfizer.com...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

This shows clearly that with this one shot alone people have been being vaxxed for more than a year with no serious side effects of the type described by the OP. Mostly it's just aches and pains.

In case you didn't know, this isn't the shot that caused those blood clots, that was the AstraZeneca vax.

This is just one of half a dozen vaxxes. Most of which have around the same timetable and participation. So we're talking about maybe half a million people who have been vaxxed for over a year when you include all of the other vax trials.

Globally, around a 1 in 3 of all people in the entire world have had at least 1 shot. Around 1 in 4 have had both since December last year. It's been 8 months since that started and no mainstream group has found any of the problems that the OP's link claims to exist. None, not one. And we're talking about some heavy hitting socialist countries in this mix, who'd absolutely nail the drug companies to the wall if there really was a problem.

ourworldindata.org...

The fact that nobody has dragged the Pfizer BOD out and murdered them in the streets is proof enough for me, because this is what would happen if they'd poisoned 100s of millions of people.

a reply to: IAMTAT

That's irrelevant because the link I sent you contains literally dozens of different references that you can use to research for yourself. There you will be able to come to logical conclusions yourself if you so desire.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars

When I watched the video last night, he said something like the problem is the spike without the body.

I believe he is talking about the body of the virus.

Its pretty much all conjecture. Lots of "what ifs" in it all.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

The spike protein produced via the vaccine, OTOH, has been found in the blood and in all major organs including crossing the blood-brain barrier.

We are still talking extremely small amounts. The word used if it did enter the blood stream is infinitesimally, and our bodies can handle a lot of just about everything, but it takes a virus to surpass that level. Its like drinking in you can drink everyday and your body can handle it, but there is a limit and the virus can surpass that limit, the vaccine doesn't.

But the big difference is that COVID protein does get into all parts of the body and attaches itself to the ACE2 receptor and the S protein receptor to start the replication process. That process damages the cell even though the lungs are its primary area it can do it in many organs. mRNA protein is made inert and does not do that since its replication process is not active.

I'm not saying there would be zero bad reactions to the vaccine, but we are talking like 1 in 6000 with the vast majority who get a bad reaction is minor.

originally posted by: Swo0p
Dr. Ryan Cole is full of it.

www.factcheck.org...

Deny Ignorance.

That brings up THIS conundrum...which media reports (media companies) do you choose to believe?
OR MORE IMPORTANTLY, which so called "experts" do you choose to believe and why?

For every 10 so called "experts" possessing what appears to be legit medical credentials and training in epidemiology, virology (or other related medical science) that takes a staunch position SUPPORTING the efficacy and safety of these experimental vaccines...
you can easily find 10 other so called "experts" with similar credentials credibly and logically CONTRADICTING those views by substantiating the inefficacy and dangers of these experimental vaccines.

Is it just the politics that drives someone to put trust in one group of "experts" vs. another ?

originally posted by: TheRedneck

There is one other part of this puzzle that seems important: the Chinese virus itself is a respiratory virus. It is geared to infect respiratory cells, not blood cells or liver cells or heart cells. I have remained convinced that the most serious part of the Chinese virus occurs when it breaches the lung/blood barrier and infiltrates the blood stream. Until that happens, the biggest concern is pneumonia from a cytokine storm, which itself could be triggered by the spike protein suddenly existing in the bloodstream in large numbers. That is the actual cause of death from the majority of virus deaths.

It is interesting you say this as I have read that many researchers are now seeing COVID more as a vascular disease do to how the spike protein attaches to the ACE2 receptors to start the replication process. With the inert status of the mRNA protein I do not think it attaches to a ACE2 receptor and if it gets in the blood it does nothing until the body gets rid of it.

The new study, however, is the first to directly show that the spike proteins themselves are able to cause harm, and also confirms that COVID-19 is primarily a vascular disease that damages blood vessel walls.

For everyone else, it appears that they are not inclined for severe complications either way. For them, it is likely that the vaccine is helpful. And that reinforces what I have said all along: I do not condone nor condemn anyone either way. It is a personal choice. The only condemnation I have is for those who demand that others get vaccinated.

I will still not get the vaccine, on my doctor's recommendation.

So far the negative reactions are few and minor. Israel is reporting 1 in 6000 cases of something like minor Myocarditis that is treated with anti-inflammatories for a couple of weeks. It is crazy how one person can get nothing an another has a bad reaction, there are a good number of people who die to low dose aspirin every year, as example.

I was never in favor of mass vaccine as I have said it is a risk to reward event. If you are in the .00001% group why get the vaccine? If you are worried about both the virus and vaccine then it is a when, not an if as to getting COVID so get your health straight if the vaccine is not good for you.

originally posted by: NaziriteWarrior

That brings up THIS conundrum...which media reports (media companies) do you choose to believe?
OR MORE IMPORTANTLY, which so called "experts" do you choose to believe and why?

For every 10 so called "experts" possessing what appears to be legit medical credentials and training in epidemiology, virology (or other related medical science) that takes a staunch position SUPPORTING the efficacy and safety of these experimental vaccines...
you can easily find 10 other so called "experts" with similar credentials credibly and logically CONTRADICTING those views by substantiating the inefficacy and dangers of these experimental vaccines.

Is it just the politics that drives someone to put trust in one group of "experts" vs. another ?

Its like when I see someone post "professional pilot sees UFOs and has lunch with little green men". For some reason credentials makes it more credible, but being a pilot myself for like 40+ years I know a lot of crazy ass pilots, I'm sure any other profession is the same.

The other side is people are making money these days with hits on their video, so that is relatively new to what could drive some super crazy narratives...

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Itisnowagain



It shows clearly that the while main stream vaxxing began in December 2021 actual vaxxing through trials began around 6 months beforehand, and by this time last year pfizer alone had vaxxed around 50,000 people in three tirals. So that's 50,000 people vaxxed for over a year. Well, nearly 50,000 anyway.

Vax details

For more specifics:

www.nature.com...

www.pfizer.com...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

This shows clearly that with this one shot alone people have been being vaxxed for more than a year with no serious side effects of the type described by the OP. Mostly it's just aches and pains.

In case you didn't know, this isn't the shot that caused those blood clots, that was the AstraZeneca vax.

This is just one of half a dozen vaxxes. Most of which have around the same timetable and participation. So we're talking about maybe half a million people who have been vaxxed for over a year when you include all of the other vax trials.

Globally, around a 1 in 3 of all people in the entire world have had at least 1 shot. Around 1 in 4 have had both since December last year. It's been 8 months since that started and no mainstream group has found any of the problems that the OP's link claims to exist. None, not one. And we're talking about some heavy hitting socialist countries in this mix, who'd absolutely nail the drug companies to the wall if there really was a problem.


So the Snake Oil salesman, the guy selling the Snake Oil for lots of money tells you, "all the snakes have been tested in the trials and none of them are poisonous, now role up your sleeve", and you role up your sleeve and take the shot?
Got it

And then the Snake Oil salesman says, "oh, and if by some remote chance you should happen to get poisoned, you can't sue me or hold me liable."

originally posted by: NaziriteWarrior

So the Snake Oil salesman, the guy selling the Snake Oil for lots of money tells you, "all the snakes have been tested in the trials and none of them are poisonous, now role up your sleeve", and you role up your sleeve and take the shot?
Got it

And then the Snake Oil salesman says, "oh, and if by some remote chance you should happen to get poisoned, you can't sue me or hold me liable."

We are now pushing a year and what 3 billion people vacced? At what point do you say OK as vaccines go it is actually pretty safe.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: NaziriteWarrior

So the Snake Oil salesman, the guy selling the Snake Oil for lots of money tells you, "all the snakes have been tested in the trials and none of them are poisonous, now role up your sleeve", and you role up your sleeve and take the shot?
Got it

And then the Snake Oil salesman says, "oh, and if by some remote chance you should happen to get poisoned, you can't sue me or hold me liable."

We are now pushing a year and what 3 billion people vacced? At what point do you say OK as vaccines go it is actually pretty safe.

Well that depends on how much information is being suppressed or censored about any adverse effects that occur.

We all know that Big Pharma (the Snake Oil salesman) and their lobbyists are all about THE MONEY, and they certainly have the power and reach to influence the narrative in their favor.

What this Doctor has talked about, the spike proteins is true. I've read it before, shared the information and people ignored it.
Don't make that same mistake people. Do NOT get the jab if you want to be healthy, live, and don't want to die a slow death, or a painful death... Stop, think, do what's right for your body.

So you really think that the lion's share of the world population will end up taking something that will kill us all?

It's billions already and rising...


a reply to: 4Everfree

But big pharma can't sell their products to dead people can they?

What they ideally want is booster shots and varient upgrades so why give us something that will kill us?

That's terrible business sense




a reply to: NaziriteWarrior

originally posted by: NaziriteWarrior

originally posted by: Swo0p
Dr. Ryan Cole is full of it.

www.factcheck.org...

Deny Ignorance.

That brings up THIS conundrum...which media reports (media companies) do you choose to believe?
OR MORE IMPORTANTLY, which so called "experts" do you choose to believe and why?

For every 10 so called "experts" possessing what appears to be legit medical credentials and training in epidemiology, virology (or other related medical science) that takes a staunch position SUPPORTING the efficacy and safety of these experimental vaccines...
you can easily find 10 other so called "experts" with similar credentials credibly and logically CONTRADICTING those views by substantiating the inefficacy and dangers of these experimental vaccines.

Is it just the politics that drives someone to put trust in one group of "experts" vs. another ?

The usual way to do it is to check which of the experts claim to have "researched" a field and which are actually qualified in it. For example, the people being cited most often are a sociologist and a dermatologist, and have not relevant qualifications in this field. A lot of the other anti vaxxers are chiropractors or holistic practitioners.

I can go on to a stage and tell you that I'm a scientist and that I researched all kinds of relevant fields, then you look me up on linked in and find out that the science that I studied was a mathematical science, not a biological science. Boom goes my credibility when not talking about physics.

originally posted by: nonspecific
So you really think that the lion's share of the world population will end up taking something that will kill us all?

It's billions already and rising...


a reply to: 4Everfree

25% double jabbed, 30% single jabbed. In most western countries it's 70-80% of the adult population. If this thing were causing harm somebody would have noticed by now. In fact so many scientists have been vaxxed that they'd have noticed that they themselves were being harmed and would surely whistleblow.

originally posted by: nonspecific
But big pharma can't sell their products to dead people can they?

What they ideally want is booster shots and varient upgrades so why give us something that will kill us?

That's terrible business sense




a reply to: NaziriteWarrior

The answer to that would be that big pharma are socialists, and that they don't care about selling products, only providing services.

Which is about as laughable an idea as saying that they want to kill us all.

If it was good google, YouTube Facebook Twitter etc wouldn’t be censoring side effects adverse reactions or people that speak up against it. It would stand on its own merits. And everyone knows it.

So the Snake Oil salesman, the guy selling the Snake Oil for lots of money tells you, "all the snakes have been tested in the trials and none of them are poisonous, now role up your sleeve", and you role up your sleeve and take the shot?
Got it
And then the Snake Oil salesman says, "oh, and if by some remote chance you should happen to get poisoned, you can't sue me or hold me liable."

Except that if the vaccine turns out to be dangerous to a large amount of people then it's almost certain that their immunity will be overturned, and if it's shown that they knew that it was dangerous and withheld the information then it's a 100% certainty that the supreme court will strike down and deal.

Big Pharma has a bad reputation, but that reputation mostly only applies to the boardroom and the sales teams. The guys in the white coats are usually good people who went into big pharma to help people.

My uncle spent decades with big pharma as a chemist, he quit the US during the Vietnam war when it looked like his research could be weaponized, and given that he wasn't a citizen and came to the US from a much poorer country this was a big deal at the time. He's been double vaxxed and I trust him.

originally posted by: NaziriteWarrior

Well that depends on how much information is being suppressed or censored about any adverse effects that occur.

We all know that Big Pharma (the Snake Oil salesman) and their lobbyists are all about THE MONEY, and they certainly have the power and reach to influence the narrative in their favor.

This isn't one or two evil companies as you seem to suggest, it is many mRNA vaccines from around the world. Independent monitoring across just about every country... I don't think you understand the the magnitude as we see BILLIONS vaccinated around the whole world.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

Except that if the vaccine turns out to be dangerous to a large amount of people then it's almost certain that their immunity will be overturned, and if it's shown that they knew that it was dangerous and withheld the information then it's a 100% certainty that the supreme court will strike down and deal.

We will most likely be about 5 billion vacced at the year mark, I truly would like to know at what point can anti-vaccers say OK it seems about as safe or safer than any other normal vaccine.... I think at the 5 year mark their tune will still be the same.