Mike Lindell 8.10.2021 Symposium - Certified 2020 Electronic Election Fraud Evidence Revealed.

nvm

a reply to: opethPA

Knowing your tendency to not be accurate about anything you post.

you should definitely go try and prove him wrong and get that 5 million . You could stream it live and be the one that showed him up and proved he was full of #

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

Thank you, Im still learning.

Tzar upddate his avatar, to a really cool one, not that the kitty wasnt, unless you have issues like me. Im gateful he did, because I would hate to miss all the great characters, like your bitchen spider! I love ATS. Best discussion platform on the web.

I like his new one (the green guy) better too.

I wouldn't wanna turn them off either. They make it much easier to quickly scroll thru a page if you're looking for a specific post. At least you know now, if you happen to run into that problem sometime in the future, you can always temporarily shut them off.


The spider wanted me to tell you Thanks.

originally posted by: sciencelol
Whole lot of experts claiming to know Lindell is full of #.

But none with the balls to go call him out and get that 5 million.

Sure says alot

I doubt that he'd accept any evidence that he was wrong. I think that if Jesus came out of the clouds with trumpets and archangels and proof that he was wrong, that he'd deny Jesus and say it was rigged.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: carewemust


It's Hard to Defend the TRUTH with a Lie . Mr. Lindell knows that Well .

Is that what the MSM is doing when they constantly use the words, "Debunked Conspiracy Theories", without ever pointing to who debunked them, and how?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: carewemust


It's Hard to Defend the TRUTH with a Lie . Mr. Lindell knows that Well .

Is that what the MSM is doing when they constantly use the words, "Debunked Conspiracy Theories", without ever pointing to who debunked them, and how?

Yeah, too bad Mike couldn't put this kind of effort into proving that American money and personnel were provided to Wuhan for their virology research, directly implicating our government in the creation of a not-bioweapon and forcing our leaders to admit their crimes.

This is going to be the clown show of all clown shows.

a reply to: Byrd

Sounds like the excuse of someone who knows they are completely full of #.

Lol!

I bet they are already there waiting for the doors to open so they can prove him wrong!



a reply to: sciencelol

Those are hardly equivalent. Way to distract and attempt to discredit by using an absurd comparison.

Mike says he has proof and he is offering 5 mil for ppl to disprove his proof.

Do you have proof that bigfoot is real? If so then you would present that and offer $ for people to inspect and disprove.

That would be equivalent. I am guessing you already knew that though.

Then again you probably haven't recieved your updated talking points yet. I am sure the media and celebrities will issue them to all loyal party members soon. Stand by comrade!

Lol!

a reply to: MiddleInsite

Those are hardly equivalent. Way to distract and attempt to discredit by using an absurd comparison.

Mike says he has proof and he is offering 5 mil for ppl to disprove his proof.

Do you have proof that bigfoot is real? If so then you would present that and offer $ for people to inspect and disprove.

That would be equivalent. I am guessing you already knew that though.

Then again you probably haven't recieved your updated talking points yet. I am sure the media and celebrities will issue them to all loyal party members soon. Stand by comrade!

Lol!

a reply to: MiddleInsite

originally posted by: Byrd

originally posted by: sciencelol
Whole lot of experts claiming to know Lindell is full of #.

But none with the balls to go call him out and get that 5 million.

Sure says alot

I doubt that he'd accept any evidence that he was wrong. I think that if Jesus came out of the clouds with trumpets and archangels and proof that he was wrong, that he'd deny Jesus and say it was rigged.

That's an even bigger lie than I thought you were capable of. I would have lost 5 million betting on you.

Bingo. All software used by government agencies of any kind need to be vetted to ensure there are no bad actors adding nefarious lines of code to it.

It's pretty basic implementation of anything. Heck even apple and google do this via their play store and apple store. You shouldn't be able to download malicious apps off their verified service / store.

But... election counting programs are super top secret and noone can audit or look at them. You know the code that counts things.. like a calculator. High risk that these auditors are going to copy it and create their own company! No way that they could have a form to sign about not disclosing or utilizing any of the proprietary code under penalties etc.. those types of forms must not exist. Lol!!

Ridiculous assertion by dominion. Just like the nonsense about routers. Insane levels of gaslighting and cover from the media on this.


a reply to: BrujaRebooted

You mean like how dominion testified in Michigan that none of its machines were connected to the internet or able to be accessed?

Have you seen the walkthrough from a dominion whistleblower showing how to access the machines remotely? You may be interested to know that he could even change the logs to cover his tracks. Makes sense that a secure voting system would need an option to log in remotely and another option to hide the fact that anything was accessed or changed remotely. Nothing suspicious about it right?

Also perfectly fine that the maricopa guys refuse to hand over the routers and info that would not be able to be changed via this method. You know to verify that noone was able to access the machines remotely? Which they are not supposed to even have options for so handing over a router would produce no connections to those machines - right? Nothing suspicious about that.

+1 for sticking to you talking points though. I am certain that you will be well rewarded comrade!

Lol!

a reply to: Fryguy

a reply to: Imperator2

Thus begins the cycle of infinite regression, an endless network of software engineers and analysts and supervising authorities. Simpler to remove automation entirely and depend on the elbow grease of hard working patriots like we've been doing for the past century.

originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
Is the Kraken here yet?

By the end of the 3 days..I suppose

And if not, which of course is how this goes.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

On a side not, I think it s absolutely hilarious that the left leaners here who insisted, "...there was no election fraud!" are now saying there is always some election fraud, just not enough to change the results. Funny how those chiseled-in-stone opinions change so easily.

To change your mind is the best evidence you have one.. that is a true thing, but in this case, I don't recall a single poster who said 0% fraud..it's not even possible to get that, on a massive scale.

originally posted by: sciencelol
a reply to: opethPA

Knowing your tendency to not be accurate about anything you post.

you should definitely go try and prove him wrong and get that 5 million . You could stream it live and be the one that showed him up and proved he was full of #

Lol. If you say so.. 😎

What does the 5 million have to do with anything I asked about?

originally posted by: opethPA

originally posted by: sciencelol
a reply to: opethPA

Knowing your tendency to not be accurate about anything you post.

you should definitely go try and prove him wrong and get that 5 million . You could stream it live and be the one that showed him up and proved he was full of #

Lol. If you say so.. 😎

What does the 5 million have to do with anything I asked about?

It's some weird circle jerk logic, Lindel has not proven sh#t, he would have to of proven something, in order to be disproven

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Vroomfondel

On a side not, I think it s absolutely hilarious that the left leaners here who insisted, "...there was no election fraud!" are now saying there is always some election fraud, just not enough to change the results. Funny how those chiseled-in-stone opinions change so easily.

To change your mind is the best evidence you have one.. that is a true thing, but in this case, I don't recall a single poster who said 0% fraud..it's not even possible to get that, on a massive scale.

Much like the FDA approving food products containing trace amounts of dirt, bugs, human detritus and other undesirable substances.