It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sciencelol
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: sciencelol
As he sits through hours on ATS refuting everyone's points.
Hours? Hardly.
Everyone's points? No. But if I see a point that's worth refuting, I will do so. There are many that are just to stupid to bother with.
All I know is you have been challenged by the PILLOW GUY. And he is offering 5 million (SIX ZEROS) of his own money.
Thats alot of money man . Remember its the Qlarp My pillow guy, easiest monet ever right? Go take his money
He is calling you out
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MykeNukem
He hasn't presented anything yet.
You have to go to his "symposium" to see it. And sit there for hours. And you're going to have to refute every one of his points.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: sciencelol
As he sits through hours on ATS refuting everyone's points.
Hours? Hardly.
Everyone's points? No. But if I see a point that's worth refuting, I will do so. There are many that are just to stupid to bother with.
originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
I'm offering 10 million for someone to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.
Five million that the Creature from the Black Lagoon doesn't exist.
Or that the Lock Ness monster doesn't exist.
See where I'm going with this?
IT'S MIKE'S JOB TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, NOT MINE TO DISPROVE. THAT'S HOW IT USUALLY WORKS IN A SANE WORLD.
And honestly, if Mikey had the evidence, he would have presented it by now. I don't understand why people don't get that.
If a tree falls in the forest, and CNN or a federal court didnt see it, did it happen?
I dont think he is saying, prove the election wasnt stolen (audits should be able to insure this). He is saying, come review the evidence we are presenting at the symposium, and if you can prove its not valid evidence of fraud he will pay you 5 million. Sounds like he is trying to get some attention on the evidence to me.
When every single ‘news’ report says ‘false’,’debunked’, ‘baseless’… you know its propaganda. Are you comfortable with that or would you rather have truth?
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MykeNukem
He hasn't presented anything yet.
You have to go to his "symposium" to see it. And sit there for hours. And you're going to have to refute every one of his points.
I suspect it'll be the same things he's waved before... the evidence that was so weak that even the pro-Trump lawyers wouldn't accept it for a deposition. We'll see if he accuses Dominion again; if so, that's more fuel for their lawsuit.
originally posted by: rickymouse
There has never been an election in this country that has had no fraud. That is just part of our reality we live in.
Was there enough fraud to change the results of the election is the only actual pertinent question. I am sixty five and for the last fifty years I have read about election fraud in places almost every year. There is a lot of it in the big cities of the country.
originally posted by: Stupidsecrets
How can an election be legit if no audit can be conducted that could overturn the results. What is the point of the audit? What is the point of the election? Both are worthless.
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
I'm offering 10 million for someone to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.
Five million that the Creature from the Black Lagoon doesn't exist.
Or that the Lock Ness monster doesn't exist.
See where I'm going with this?
IT'S MIKE'S JOB TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, NOT MINE TO DISPROVE. THAT'S HOW IT USUALLY WORKS IN A SANE WORLD.
And honestly, if Mikey had the evidence, he would have presented it by now. I don't understand why people don't get that.
If a tree falls in the forest, and CNN or a federal court didnt see it, did it happen?
I dont think he is saying, prove the election wasnt stolen (audits should be able to insure this). He is saying, come review the evidence we are presenting at the symposium, and if you can prove its not valid evidence of fraud he will pay you 5 million. Sounds like he is trying to get some attention on the evidence to me.
When every single ‘news’ report says ‘false’,’debunked’, ‘baseless’… you know its propaganda. Are you comfortable with that or would you rather have truth?
So, how does one know what they are looking at? a big pile of papers with numbers? That would be like a company handing the yearly accounting to the janitor to figure out.
I'm saying, sh#t, or get off the pot..seems pretty simple.
originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
I'm offering 10 million for someone to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.
Five million that the Creature from the Black Lagoon doesn't exist.
Or that the Lock Ness monster doesn't exist.
See where I'm going with this?
IT'S MIKE'S JOB TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, NOT MINE TO DISPROVE. THAT'S HOW IT USUALLY WORKS IN A SANE WORLD.
And honestly, if Mikey had the evidence, he would have presented it by now. I don't understand why people don't get that.
If a tree falls in the forest, and CNN or a federal court didnt see it, did it happen?
I dont think he is saying, prove the election wasnt stolen (audits should be able to insure this). He is saying, come review the evidence we are presenting at the symposium, and if you can prove its not valid evidence of fraud he will pay you 5 million. Sounds like he is trying to get some attention on the evidence to me.
When every single ‘news’ report says ‘false’,’debunked’, ‘baseless’… you know its propaganda. Are you comfortable with that or would you rather have truth?
So, how does one know what they are looking at? a big pile of papers with numbers? That would be like a company handing the yearly accounting to the janitor to figure out.
I'm saying, sh#t, or get off the pot..seems pretty simple.
Perhaps that is why he is having a 3 day symposium. Im a lady so I won’t stick with your tasteless ‘pot’ cliche. The 5 million seems to be a healthy motivating wager. Take him up on it! Dont blame Mike if you cant do the maths… others can. Maybe this will finally get someone to at least look at the evidence and not just dismiss it as kooky.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: mamabeth
You have it backwards, anyone with an IQ above room temperature knows Trump lost....this goes to show the IQ of Trump's base.v
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: BrujaRebooted
I guess we will see in 3 days..and, sorry if you are offended, I think it was a fair statement still.
And you didn't address my question? how do you know what you're looking at?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
I'm offering 10 million for someone to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.
Five million that the Creature from the Black Lagoon doesn't exist.
Or that the Lock Ness monster doesn't exist.
See where I'm going with this?
IT'S MIKE'S JOB TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, NOT MINE TO DISPROVE. THAT'S HOW IT USUALLY WORKS IN A SANE WORLD.
And honestly, if Mikey had the evidence, he would have presented it by now. I don't understand why people don't get that.
If a tree falls in the forest, and CNN or a federal court didnt see it, did it happen?
I dont think he is saying, prove the election wasnt stolen (audits should be able to insure this). He is saying, come review the evidence we are presenting at the symposium, and if you can prove its not valid evidence of fraud he will pay you 5 million. Sounds like he is trying to get some attention on the evidence to me.
When every single ‘news’ report says ‘false’,’debunked’, ‘baseless’… you know its propaganda. Are you comfortable with that or would you rather have truth?
So, how does one know what they are looking at? a big pile of papers with numbers? That would be like a company handing the yearly accounting to the janitor to figure out.
I'm saying, sh#t, or get off the pot..seems pretty simple.
Perhaps that is why he is having a 3 day symposium. Im a lady so I won’t stick with your tasteless ‘pot’ cliche. The 5 million seems to be a healthy motivating wager. Take him up on it! Dont blame Mike if you cant do the maths… others can. Maybe this will finally get someone to at least look at the evidence and not just dismiss it as kooky.
If it was actually that easy, there would be no flat earth theorists.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: rickymouse
There has never been an election in this country that has had no fraud. That is just part of our reality we live in.
Was there enough fraud to change the results of the election is the only actual pertinent question. I am sixty five and for the last fifty years I have read about election fraud in places almost every year. There is a lot of it in the big cities of the country.
Former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich was released from Prison last year. He was convicted of election-related fraud pertaining to Illinois Senator Obama's U.S. Senate seat.
Blagojevich said the "perfect storm" of mail-in non-verified ballots, added to the normal cheating apparatuses, made the Nov 2020 election a "wet dream come true" for urban Democrat leaders.