Mike Lindell 8.10.2021 Symposium - Certified 2020 Electronic Election Fraud Evidence Revealed.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
I'm offering 10 million for someone to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.

Five million that the Creature from the Black Lagoon doesn't exist.

Or that the Lock Ness monster doesn't exist.

See where I'm going with this?

IT'S MIKE'S JOB TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, NOT MINE TO DISPROVE. THAT'S HOW IT USUALLY WORKS IN A SANE WORLD.

And honestly, if Mikey had the evidence, he would have presented it by now. I don't understand why people don't get that.

If a tree falls in the forest, and CNN or a federal court didnt see it, did it happen?

I dont think he is saying, prove the election wasnt stolen (audits should be able to insure this). He is saying, come review the evidence we are presenting at the symposium, and if you can prove its not valid evidence of fraud he will pay you 5 million. Sounds like he is trying to get some attention on the evidence to me.

When every single ‘news’ report says ‘false’,’debunked’, ‘baseless’… you know its propaganda. Are you comfortable with that or would you rather have truth?

So, how does one know what they are looking at? a big pile of papers with numbers? That would be like a company handing the yearly accounting to the janitor to figure out.

I'm saying, sh#t, or get off the pot..seems pretty simple.

Perhaps that is why he is having a 3 day symposium. Im a lady so I won’t stick with your tasteless ‘pot’ cliche. The 5 million seems to be a healthy motivating wager. Take him up on it! Dont blame Mike if you cant do the maths… others can. Maybe this will finally get someone to at least look at the evidence and not just dismiss it as kooky.

If it was actually that easy, there would be no flat earth theorists.

Im new here, and dont know how to block you. I have a vision problem, and your avatar is very grating. Ive mentioned it before. Please dont address me, at least, and I’ll do my best to scroll past you. Thanks for your consideration of this small favor.

Fixed it just for you buddy.

Knowing your tendency to not use accurate info but rather your interpretation of info I figured I would do some fact checking...

originally posted by: carewemust
Currently, 32% of Democrats feel Joe Biden won via CHEATING/FRAUD.

Where do you get your % values from?
I can't find a single source that states 32% of Democrats feel Joe Biden won via CHEATING/FRAUD.

I can however find multiple sources that state 32% of Americans, comprised from all political parties, feels that way. For example www.newsweek.com...

I can also find sources that talk about 32% of Democrats thinking he is not in charge: www.yahoo.com...

Nothing that matches up to your claim of 32% of Democrats think he cheated.

originally posted by: carewemust
Currently, 57% of all Americans feel Joe Biden is NOT the person running our country.

Assuming you are using the metric in this article or something similar it's a similar statementv, "Fifty-seven percent of respondents to a Convention of States Action and Trafalgar Group poll said the president is not fully executing the duties of his office. Thirty-six percent said they were confident that he was directing all policy and agenda matters.

www.yahoo.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
Prove there was fraud in Arizona (for starters) that benefited Joe Biden, and he is instantly worse than a "lame duck" President. -AL SHARPTON (Democrat leader)

Where do you get this quote from?
No searches rerturn it as something being said by Al Sharpton

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
I'm offering 10 million for someone to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.

Five million that the Creature from the Black Lagoon doesn't exist.

Or that the Lock Ness monster doesn't exist.

See where I'm going with this?

IT'S MIKE'S JOB TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, NOT MINE TO DISPROVE. THAT'S HOW IT USUALLY WORKS IN A SANE WORLD.

And honestly, if Mikey had the evidence, he would have presented it by now. I don't understand why people don't get that.

If a tree falls in the forest, and CNN or a federal court didnt see it, did it happen?

I dont think he is saying, prove the election wasnt stolen (audits should be able to insure this). He is saying, come review the evidence we are presenting at the symposium, and if you can prove its not valid evidence of fraud he will pay you 5 million. Sounds like he is trying to get some attention on the evidence to me.

When every single ‘news’ report says ‘false’,’debunked’, ‘baseless’… you know its propaganda. Are you comfortable with that or would you rather have truth?

So, how does one know what they are looking at? a big pile of papers with numbers? That would be like a company handing the yearly accounting to the janitor to figure out.

I'm saying, sh#t, or get off the pot..seems pretty simple.

Perhaps that is why he is having a 3 day symposium. Im a lady so I won’t stick with your tasteless ‘pot’ cliche. The 5 million seems to be a healthy motivating wager. Take him up on it! Dont blame Mike if you cant do the maths… others can. Maybe this will finally get someone to at least look at the evidence and not just dismiss it as kooky.

If it was actually that easy, there would be no flat earth theorists.

Im new here, and dont know how to block you. I have a vision problem, and your avatar is very grating. Ive mentioned it before. Please dont address me, at least, and I’ll do my best to scroll past you. Thanks for your consideration of this small favor.

Fixed it just for you buddy.

Thats very kind of you, Sir. Thank you. Kitteh is cool, is it possible to just turn off the animated flashing?

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: BrujaRebooted
I guess we will see in 3 days..and, sorry if you are offended, I think it was a fair statement still.

And you didn't address my question? how do you know what you're looking at?

Dont bully me into answering rhetorical or vague questions. Do you really think he’s going to haul in a pile of papers with numbers?

Im expecting a bit of content over 72 hrs. Why are you throwing tomatoes before the symposium has even started? Its free online. You can meet back here with me and discuss all you’d like after its over, (if you watch your language when addressing me).

Bully you?..wow

originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: jrod

Trump didn't lose,the democRATS cheated,lied and
stole the election.Then put a senile,old man suffering
from dementia, into the White House.Who has to have
help getting his bottom wiped and eats boogies.That was
a brilliant move on their part if their goal was to destroy
our country from the inside out!

That is merely your opinion.

There has yet to be ANY evidence of Trump and friends claim that the election was stolen from Trump.

Perhaps Lindell should be offering money for proof of fraud that prevented from winning.

What he is asking for would be no different than trying to prove aliens do not exist....it is an impossible to prove especially when the challenger is begging the question.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
I'm offering 10 million for someone to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.

Five million that the Creature from the Black Lagoon doesn't exist.

Or that the Lock Ness monster doesn't exist.

See where I'm going with this?

IT'S MIKE'S JOB TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, NOT MINE TO DISPROVE. THAT'S HOW IT USUALLY WORKS IN A SANE WORLD.

And honestly, if Mikey had the evidence, he would have presented it by now. I don't understand why people don't get that.

If a tree falls in the forest, and CNN or a federal court didnt see it, did it happen?

I dont think he is saying, prove the election wasnt stolen (audits should be able to insure this). He is saying, come review the evidence we are presenting at the symposium, and if you can prove its not valid evidence of fraud he will pay you 5 million. Sounds like he is trying to get some attention on the evidence to me.

When every single ‘news’ report says ‘false’,’debunked’, ‘baseless’… you know its propaganda. Are you comfortable with that or would you rather have truth?

So, how does one know what they are looking at? a big pile of papers with numbers? That would be like a company handing the yearly accounting to the janitor to figure out.

I'm saying, sh#t, or get off the pot..seems pretty simple.

Perhaps that is why he is having a 3 day symposium. Im a lady so I won’t stick with your tasteless ‘pot’ cliche. The 5 million seems to be a healthy motivating wager. Take him up on it! Dont blame Mike if you cant do the maths… others can. Maybe this will finally get someone to at least look at the evidence and not just dismiss it as kooky.

If it was actually that easy, there would be no flat earth theorists.

Im new here, and dont know how to block you. I have a vision problem, and your avatar is very grating. Ive mentioned it before. Please dont address me, at least, and I’ll do my best to scroll past you. Thanks for your consideration of this small favor.

Fixed it just for you buddy.

Thats very kind of you, Sir. Thank you. Kitteh is cool, is it possible to just turn off the animated flashing?

I'll find another eventually, small sacrifice to pay for being neighborly.

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: BrujaRebooted
I guess we will see in 3 days..and, sorry if you are offended, I think it was a fair statement still.

And you didn't address my question? how do you know what you're looking at?

Dont bully me into answering rhetorical or vague questions. Do you really think he’s going to haul in a pile of papers with numbers?

Im expecting a bit of content over 72 hrs. Why are you throwing tomatoes before the symposium has even started? Its free online. You can meet back here with me and discuss all you’d like after its over, (if you watch your language when addressing me).

Bully you?..wow

Here was your question: ‘So, how does one know what they are looking at? a big pile of papers with numbers?’

To which I immediately answered: ‘Perhaps that is why he is having a 3 day symposium’

Then you say: ‘you didnt address my question, how do you know what you are looking at’

I did answer it. Seems you missed it. Re-asking it indicated you didnt accept my answer and chose to keep pressing on me with an imaginary preposition, the ‘big pile of papers with numbers on them.’

Yeah, dont bully me to play your silly game.

a reply to: andy06shake

The $5 million certainly adds spice to the presentation.

It's like the medical examiner who put together the Jeffrey Epstein "suicide" scene for a Sean Hannity show, and demonstrated how it was impossible for Epstein to kill himself.

He then proceeded to show the Coroner info, and dared any other medical person to prove that his theory was wrong.

This medical examiner didn't have a $cash$ reward to offer anyone who could debunk his evidence that Epstein was murdered, but it's the same principle Lindell is using.

a reply to: carewemust


It's Hard to Defend the TRUTH with a Lie . Mr. Lindell knows that Well .

a reply to: jrod

Well there is evidence,just that no one will take it up due to lack of standing. Why dont they ignore the standing and try it,to see what happens?
Many judges have been threatened or intimidated as well i hear to not try the cases.

a reply to: carewemust

Aye but Mike Pillow makes a terrible Quincy show mate.

What he is after is proof, of the actual tangible sorts, that holds up in a court of law, and not the food court.

It will be entertaining put it that way.

Is the Kraken here yet?

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: Stupidsecrets
How can an election be legit if no audit can be conducted that could overturn the results. What is the point of the audit? What is the point of the election? Both are worthless. Case in point. If Biden had lost, conducted an audit and it determined he won so what. Can't be overturned. They already said it is not possible. There is no process to un-certify and re-certify.

Another point. The machine software is proprietary. Can't be audited so a full audit can never be conducted.

What people need to accept is the US does not have an election. It has a process but it's not an election.

Funny thing, when I was an IT spec for the Feds, there was no such thing as proprietary. A process called certification was conducted on every bit of software installed on the network. Including code walkthroughs, teams comprised of the contractors that wrote the code, and government specialists, of all code being certified. Why cant a state govt do the same?

There are audits performed on all election machines. The problem is that it was discovered that laws were broken and strict guidelines on behavior were not followed. In Michigan for example, there is a state law that requires machines to be certified as accurate and correct prior to an election. Once certified it is illegal to change/update/erase any data logs or audits unless the machine is re-certified prior to the election. It was discovered that machines were updated with new code the night before the election, then reloaded with the original code immediately after the election with no recertification on either occasion. It was also discovered that the updated code switched Trump votes to biden. None of those results should have been allowed into the election tabulation.

On a side not, I think it s absolutely hilarious that the left leaners here who insisted, "...there was no election fraud!" are now saying there is always some election fraud, just not enough to change the results. Funny how those chiseled-in-stone opinions change so easily.

a reply to: carewemust
Yup. He's certified, all right.

a reply to: BrujaRebooted

Im new here, and dont know how to block you. I have a vision problem, and your avatar is very grating. Ive mentioned it before. Please dont address me, at least, and I’ll do my best to scroll past you. Thanks for your consideration of this small favor.

You may already know this, but if not....

I don't think you can block a single avatar, but if it really bothers you that much, you can disable ALL Avatars.


click the arrow for the dropdown menu
click 'Account'
scroll down and click 'Hide'

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
I'm offering 10 million for someone to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist.

Five million that the Creature from the Black Lagoon doesn't exist.

Or that the Lock Ness monster doesn't exist.

See where I'm going with this?

IT'S MIKE'S JOB TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, NOT MINE TO DISPROVE. THAT'S HOW IT USUALLY WORKS IN A SANE WORLD.

And honestly, if Mikey had the evidence, he would have presented it by now. I don't understand why people don't get that.

If a tree falls in the forest, and CNN or a federal court didnt see it, did it happen?

I dont think he is saying, prove the election wasnt stolen (audits should be able to insure this). He is saying, come review the evidence we are presenting at the symposium, and if you can prove its not valid evidence of fraud he will pay you 5 million. Sounds like he is trying to get some attention on the evidence to me.

When every single ‘news’ report says ‘false’,’debunked’, ‘baseless’… you know its propaganda. Are you comfortable with that or would you rather have truth?

So, how does one know what they are looking at? a big pile of papers with numbers? That would be like a company handing the yearly accounting to the janitor to figure out.

I'm saying, sh#t, or get off the pot..seems pretty simple.

Perhaps that is why he is having a 3 day symposium. Im a lady so I won’t stick with your tasteless ‘pot’ cliche. The 5 million seems to be a healthy motivating wager. Take him up on it! Dont blame Mike if you cant do the maths… others can. Maybe this will finally get someone to at least look at the evidence and not just dismiss it as kooky.

If it was actually that easy, there would be no flat earth theorists.

Im new here, and dont know how to block you. I have a vision problem, and your avatar is very grating. Ive mentioned it before. Please dont address me, at least, and I’ll do my best to scroll past you. Thanks for your consideration of this small favor.

Fixed it just for you buddy.

Thats very kind of you, Sir. Thank you. Kitteh is cool, is it possible to just turn off the animated flashing?

I'll find another eventually, small sacrifice to pay for being neighborly.

Oh the new avatar is really great! Looks good on you! Thank you again, my friend.

nvm

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted

originally posted by: Stupidsecrets
How can an election be legit if no audit can be conducted that could overturn the results. What is the point of the audit? What is the point of the election? Both are worthless. Case in point. If Biden had lost, conducted an audit and it determined he won so what. Can't be overturned. They already said it is not possible. There is no process to un-certify and re-certify.

Another point. The machine software is proprietary. Can't be audited so a full audit can never be conducted.

What people need to accept is the US does not have an election. It has a process but it's not an election.

Funny thing, when I was an IT spec for the Feds, there was no such thing as proprietary. A process called certification was conducted on every bit of software installed on the network. Including code walkthroughs, teams comprised of the contractors that wrote the code, and government specialists, of all code being certified. Why cant a state govt do the same?

There are audits performed on all election machines. The problem is that it was discovered that laws were broken and strict guidelines on behavior were not followed. In Michigan for example, there is a state law that requires machines to be certified as accurate and correct prior to an election. Once certified it is illegal to change/update/erase any data logs or audits unless the machine is re-certified prior to the election. It was discovered that machines were updated with new code the night before the election, then reloaded with the original code immediately after the election with no recertification on either occasion. It was also discovered that the updated code switched Trump votes to biden. None of those results should have been allowed into the election tabulation.

On a side not, I think it s absolutely hilarious that the left leaners here who insisted, "...there was no election fraud!" are now saying there is always some election fraud, just not enough to change the results. Funny how those chiseled-in-stone opinions change so easily.

Thats just one example on the voting machine side, the counting machines apparently have parameters that can be tweeked if too many ballots are being kicked out for hand validation. Signature matching algorithm, for example. x+1 isnt so simple once those kinds of functions are introduced.

Its a freaking mess x 50.

originally posted by: BrokenCircles
a reply to: BrujaRebooted

Im new here, and dont know how to block you. I have a vision problem, and your avatar is very grating. Ive mentioned it before. Please dont address me, at least, and I’ll do my best to scroll past you. Thanks for your consideration of this small favor.

You may already know this, but if not....

I don't think you can block a single avatar, but if it really bothers you that much, you can disable ALL Avatars.

click the arrow for the dropdown menu
click 'Account'
scroll down and click 'Hide'

Thank you, Im still learning.

Tzar upddate his avatar, to a really cool one, not that the kitty wasnt, unless you have issues like me. Im gateful he did, because I would hate to miss all the great characters, like your bitchen spider! I love ATS. Best discussion platform on the web.

Whole lot of experts claiming to know Lindell is full of #.

But none with the balls to go call him out and get that 5 million.

Sure says alot